But this is exactly what you do.
You're the most prolific poster in this thread since you joined the community.
When the thread goes quiet, you're the first one to boost it!
You should contemplate what you've typed before hitting 'post'
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Management ENIC
- Thread starter The Fighting Cock
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
You're the most prolific poster in this thread since you joined the community.
When the thread goes quiet, you're the first one to boost it!
You should contemplate what you've typed before hitting 'post'
If ever there was a perfect time for that Spiderman meme...
I'm sure admin can see what's going on here. The self styled moderators have already succeeded in driving any criticism of ENIC to one thread, now they're trying to moderate that thread too.
If all mention of Levy / ENIC is shoehorned into a single thread, it's pretty obvious that thread will be more active than usual.
I was away from the forum for a couple of weeks and when I came back I noticed the ENIC social media employees had become particularly brazen and confident, and even seemed to have taken over the forum in some sort of Taliban style coup that I had to check the news on Spurs to see if by some miracle we had somehow managed to win the league post season with all other 7 clubs above us being disqualified or something, but no. It was just because we had finally sold Harry Winks.
Well done City. This is perfect example of improving your football club. Pay attention to the football first and then do the addons. Fucking Lev should learn a thing or two.
This thread is obviously the place to post about the owners. Don’t think anyone is saying otherwise. I also believe that the ownership should be discussed in the transfer thread, because they are a huge part of transfers.
In fact, they own the club, so are a huge part of the club. They should be discussed in every thread in the Tottenham Hotspur section of the forum and a fair whack of the General Football section too.
However, I’m always being told the owners aren’t the club. Which is partly true. But when there’s a nice handy stick to beat them with, suddenly they are a major cog in the machine. I support the club as a whole, including the owners. Doesn’t mean I can’t get in a wee tantrum when we lose a match, or coat off a player for playing shite, or give the owners grief for not signing a fucking centre back.
In that though, if I posted on the Kane thread “well done to Levy for building the infrastructure and hiring the staff to help make Kane a success”, the thread would be jumped on like tramps fighting for chips.
As with anything club related, the owners are responsible. The bad stuff and the good stuff. It would be fantastic if this were recognised.
In fact, they own the club, so are a huge part of the club. They should be discussed in every thread in the Tottenham Hotspur section of the forum and a fair whack of the General Football section too.
However, I’m always being told the owners aren’t the club. Which is partly true. But when there’s a nice handy stick to beat them with, suddenly they are a major cog in the machine. I support the club as a whole, including the owners. Doesn’t mean I can’t get in a wee tantrum when we lose a match, or coat off a player for playing shite, or give the owners grief for not signing a fucking centre back.
In that though, if I posted on the Kane thread “well done to Levy for building the infrastructure and hiring the staff to help make Kane a success”, the thread would be jumped on like tramps fighting for chips.
As with anything club related, the owners are responsible. The bad stuff and the good stuff. It would be fantastic if this were recognised.
We are owned by a murderer who has his private militia and invites IDF terrorists .
I was literally replying to someone who is vehemently ENIC in within this thread yesterday … a certain Frenchman will tell you he’s ENIC in loud & proud too. As will several other posters, if offered the choice they would choose ENIC.
Dunno why you’re pretending otherwise. Nobody dedicates the amount of time they do to defending people who they don’t rate as owners. There are a good few on here who would probably proudly tell you they are ENIC in.
But he isnt a kiddy fiddling 70s popstar so swings and roundabouts.
Not being rabidly Enic out does not equate to being Enic in
Wouldnt put it past him. But yes they are all scumbags. There's no morally superior owner.
Nope, but some of you are ENIC in. That's not me insulting those people, but they just are. Constantly defending the ownership is not something you do if you want them out. People who really want them out don't care if they get some 'unfair' criticism.
As I said, the two are not mutually exclusive.
I've said repeatedly on here that I am not against new owners
It's the type of new owners we'd get that worries me.
People can interpret that as "Stockholm syndrome" to get a few likes, but the truth is that no one here is truly Enic in.
The kick back against the constant BS and made up bollocks, and indeed childish comments such as "Levybot etc) on here also does not equate to Enic in.
But there is a nuance between discussing and refuting OTT claims and thinking they are amazing owners.
You think that because some people enjoy debating OTT claims that makes them ENIC in, i get that's how it comes across to you. But you would have to then concede that the OTT claims make out people to not be genuine in their criticisms and they are just coming across as babies cos their mates are having some good bantz with them.
Either way, i think it is probably best to let those who want to have tantrums, have them.
That's just not the truth though. I can name multiple posters who are 100% ENIC in, why are we pretending otherwise? They will quote the owners, post 500 charts defending them, claim they have done far more than good for the club but they're not ENIC in?
People voted ENIC in for a fucking poll. How much more ENIC in can you get? You're acting like there's only two camps (ambivalent and out) and it just isn't true at all. There are dedicated ENIC in posters on here who believe these owners are good for the club overall. They'll probably even admit it to you if you ask nicely.
No I just know there are ENIC in posters on here. There are others who I know just pushback as what they view as being extreme or just don't like ENIC out posters, I could name them as well. But there are ENIC in posters on here.
No idea if you're one of them, haven't seen enough of your posts. And btw, I'm not saying this as an insult to them .. if you're ENIC in that's fine, it's their opinion. I find the denial of their existence really weird though.
If i remember correctly, he has stated many times he is not Enic IN but takes the argument to 'at least our owners are not Gary Glittler'. Caught in his own web of lies.So.
The current line of argument is ‘at least Levy isn’t a pedo’.
