• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Management ENIC

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

ENIC In or ENIC Out


  • Total voters
    209
Why would they want him around ? Investors in the whole infrastructure may but investors solely in the football probably wouldn’t . They’d want a say in things otherwise why would they invest .
Because whether we like it or not, in the world of high level finance and football executives he is very highly regarded as a professional in that industry.

You saw what a dog’s dinner Clearlake made of the first couple of years at Chelsea. Also QSI have had many growing pains at PSG as they took charge there.

It really depends who these investors are. It’s long been rumoured that Levy was talking to QSI and the PSG president Al-Khelaifi. Obviously Uefa rules prohibit QSI owning a majority of both PSG and Spurs.

But anyone with the kind of money to buy Spurs in Qatar is gonna be in some way linked to the ruling family and government anyway, so it might be work around.
 
I guess that they want Levy around for some consistency and because of his contact network in the league.

The article says that the proposal is a phased buy out, with Levy being given a contract to stay on as executive chairman (so essentially no longer a owner but a employee). And I guess that once ENIC are fully out of the picture Levy might go as well with a nice severance package. But that's me guessing.

Consistency of ?
 
Agree with much of this but I place a little more emphasis on winning stuff, even the more minor domestic pots. Basically I think we're not in a position to turn up our noses at ANY silverware - heck, I'd even accept a conference league win (as long as we don't call ourselves 'champions of Europe' like West Ham did, lol).

To the nub of your points - the obvious answer for me to league vs cups is a bit of both, if we can have that: the odd cup win and getting into/around the top four. I know our own history over the past 30-40 years hasn't reflected this but they aren't mutually exclusive - how many domestic cups have City won in their recent period of dominance? I'd bet it's quite a few. I know you get interesting ones like Wigan a few years back but I'd say that's something of an exception to the rule - and yes, totally accept the League/CL are the big ones.

Just to answer one of your questions directly - if we finished say 10th and won an FA cup then yes, I'd consider that a successful season. It's an exceptional circumstance but we're so starved of silverware I'd be more than happy to accept it.

My gut feeling has been we were never good enough to win a cup this year and the less said about the league the better, and that's been shown over the last week. There's of course the possibility we get lucky with the EL, but we drew with Rangers and were made to look second rate by Galatasaray, I can't see it happening unfortunately.

Thanks for the thoughtful response mate - I agree with most of what you say!

I'd say City are a bit of an exception in recent times - they simply had the depth to go deep into every competition - Liveprool are doing a decent job of it too - but last weekend showed that maybe they don't have the quality in depth to go as far as they would like - and I'm sure as the season wears on one of Europe or the League will suffer.
 
Timing stinks a bit.

A protest against the ownership
is planned for this weekend, and this gets published today?

I mean, we have had people on here saying this stuff ONLY gets posted around transfer time, ONLY season ticket renewal time etc.

These articles get posted all the time - I don't think there is much of a conspiracy around it.
 
Why would they want him around ? Investors in the whole infrastructure may but investors solely in the football probably wouldn’t . They’d want a say in things otherwise why would they invest .


Because most people coming in new to run a football club completely fuck it up

It would, hopefully, be best of both worlds - 1) proper funding into the team 2) an experienced administrator to oversee it
 
Club is extremely attractive to investors.

Low wages
Lots of headroom to spend while meeting spending regs
Even more if you consider the stadium still waiting for naming rights
Young talent

I have personally enjoyed local lads running the club and I don’t want to see Middle Eastern or American money. But if that’s the way football is so be it. I’ll spend more time watching rugby.
 
It's been discussed already in here but I think that Levy staying on, at least initially, is a must for any deal to go through. Spurs is essentially Levy's inheritance from Lewis.

The question is if a new, more ambitious owner would cause Daniel to himself be more ambitious, or if a new owner would be able to actually keep him contained to just the business side?

They'd move him on eventually as they would want control themselves.

He is well in with PSG's owners though, they sit on the ECA together, or did. This must be new as Levy is no longer on there...

 
Because whether we like it or not, in the world of high level finance and football executives he is very highly regarded as a professional in that industry.

You saw what a dog’s dinner Clearlake made of the first couple of years at Chelsea. Also QSI have had many growing pains at PSG as they took charge there.

It really depends who these investors are. It’s long been rumoured that Levy was talking to QSI and the PSG president Al-Khelaifi. Obviously Uefa rules prohibit QSI owning a majority of both PSG and Spurs.

But anyone with the kind of money to buy Spurs in Qatar is gonna be in some way linked to the ruling family and government anyway, so it might be work around.
The article says that it is a private investment firm/a group of private investors from Qatar. But if true there are still going to be some form of link to the QSI/government.

But it would be very us to get gulf backing on a budget. Even if said budget dwarfs our current spending.
 
Like it or not, Levy is an experienced and well-connected chairman.

The key question for any takeover is how much authority he would have over football decisions.

He’s known to be a royal pain in the arse 😂

Which would be great if it was solely to benefit the football

I’d hope investors wouldn’t just turn up saying “ Helllloooo we’re here “

I’d hope they’d have a plan




But it would be very us to get gulf backing on a budget. Even if said budget dwarfs our current spending.

Indeedy but maybe the ENIC curse would be lifted 🤞
 
The article says that it is a private investment firm/a group of private investors from Qatar. But if true there are still going to be some form of link to the QSI/government.

But it would be very us to get gulf backing on a budget. Even if said budget dwarfs our current spending.

It would be very us to have a chairman in Levy who has spent the best part of a decade championing FFP as a way to stop these middle eastern owners from spending vast sums on us, only to sell us to one who then fall foul of what Levy has previously help orchestrate!
 
I have personally enjoyed local lads running the club

Cant Speak Nathan Fillion GIF
 
Back
Top