I guess they better get on with organising that protest march then
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
I have seen this happen before at one of Tavistock's other UK based businesses, the appointment of a non-executive, review of operations, then changes at board level. Charrington will and remove Levy if necessary, he has a history of getting underperforming businesses to reach their potential.
Lewis also gave our board of directors the privilege of being able to remove and appoint a new Chairman some time ago, 3/4 of the board needed to vote him out, This was done to avoid complacency at board level but obviously hasn't happened, they have all got to comfortable with each other and are now all complacent.
But apparently it's not making enough money so that the high wages for top players can be paid. Solanke is meant to be our record signing fee, according to certain websites (I don't know how they find out players wages) he's on a relatively low £90.000 per week.Problem with that theory is that THFC as a business are not underperforming, not by a long shot . It’s making money with very little investment by Lewis
But apparently it's not making enough money so that the high wages for top players can be paid. Solanke is meant to be our record signing fee, according to certain websites (I don't know how they find out) he's on a relatively low £90.000 per week.
There are some rumblings about sponsors not being happy with the league placement. Probably the long term ones like Nike and AIA who got locked into set rates.I
Problem with that theory is that THFC as a business are not underperforming, not by a long shot . It’s making money with very little investment by Lewis
That was true for many years, but with Lewis' shares now held in trust it's now the trustee(s), acting as a fiduciary of the trust's beneficiaries, who have that operational control.It's a privately owned company, not a publicly traded corporation. There's no need for palace intrigue, Lewis could sack Levy with a phone call.
![]()
I don’t think Lewis's trust / ENIC particularly cares about that
There are some rumblings about sponsors not being happy with the league placement. Probably the long term ones like Nike and AIA who got locked into set rates.
That could grind Lewis'/ENIC's gears I guess.
Keeping the wage bill down by signing particularly young players is to help their business model to work.
Good postThat was true for many years, but with Lewis' shares now held in trust it's now the trustee(s), acting as a fiduciary of the trust's beneficiaries, who have that operational control.
You would not generally associate that kind of situation with dramatic upheaval of management at a business like Spurs, leaving a longtime steward like Levy who's done well by the asset value for decades at the helm would seem like prudent trusteeship even if it's not ruthless sporting competitiveness.
And of course even though the trust *technically* takes control of the club out of Lewis' hands, no one is pretending this is anything other than a vampire oligarch's tax evasion scheme, and the people who administer these trusts know not to bite the hand that feeds them.
That's a lot of throat clearing to get to the point: I think it's now the trustee(s) or their relevant board representation with the power to fire Levy, as opposed to Lewis himself as when he was the majority shareholder.
But still, I assume all of this is about selling a minority share to generate some funds.
Its obvious they use Spurs cash to generate money to build their hotels etc...Keeping the wage bill down by signing particularly young players is to help their business model to work.
Apparently they've been making £55m per off season for the stadium events, ( I read that in a Goldman Sachs report). I've also read online that there is going to be more events because Haringey Council had capped tthe events at 16 but now the club have obtained a licence to have 30 events. So the £55m will be about doubled.Its obvious they use Spurs cash to generate money to build their hotels etc...
Thats where our player wages are going.
That’s great if the money is used to fund the football club. They can have a Beyoncé or Jay Z concert every night for all I care.Apparently they've been making £55m per off season for the stadium events, ( I read that in a Goldman Sachs report). I've also read online that there is going to be more events because Haringey Council had capped tthe events at 16 but now the club have obtained a licence to have 30 events. So the £55m will be about doubled.
Whether that revenue is spent on players I don't know.
Think I read somewhere we’d spent £10m so far on the hotel. That’s one year of salary for a good player. Son kind of level.Its obvious they use Spurs cash to generate money to build their hotels etc...
Thats where our player wages are going.
And before people with their heads in the stand start telling us it is being invested into the team / player wages etc....How come all these other clubs with no such revenue are investing more in their teams than usThat’s great if the money is used to fund the football club. They can have a Beyoncé or Jay Z concert every night for all I care.
But I don’t think that money does go back into funding team building, at least not all of it.
Think I read somewhere we’d spent £10m so far on the hotel. That’s one year of salary for a good player. Son kind of level.
The hotel is going to cost £80m in total. Let’s say it all comes out of the football club budget. That’s less than a Solanke, including fee and salary.
As it is, I’m sure the club aren’t paying for this, but is probably being used as collateral for loans. Could be wrong though.
Nevertheless, the hotel build isn’t what’s stopping us spending more on fees or salaries.

Yeah. You usually areAs it is, I’m sure the club aren’t paying for this, but is probably being used as collateral for loans. Could be wrong .
What’s your thoughts on how the hotel is being funded?