That is an overly simplistic view. Under Joe Lewis, the plan for Spurs was undoubtedly to buy at the right time (just before the PL era kicked off and the massive TV money boost), invest in the infrastructure and turn a club worth £80Million into one worth Billions. Job done. But Joe Lewis is 88 years old. Anyone with a relative past 85 will know that there is a significant cognitive and physical decline. Joe is no longer the decision maker - his kids are (I say kids but I think they are 60+ themselves). Jordan's position that ENIC cannot say they want to win more when they haven't invested over the last 25 years is flawed as he is talking about Joe Lewis and Daniel Levy, and not Vivienne . ENIC are effectively in a new era with new chiefs at the helm, and the next 5 years are more relevant than the last 25 years.
I have listened to a lot of experts the last few days online / pods / radio etc. This is a complex topic. But ultimately, with no loyatly / bond to Levy (similar to what Joe Lewis had), what did Lewis' kids have to gain from keeping Levy around? He acts as if he owns the club when he is only a minority shareholder. Everything went through him, inc. takeover bids, naming rights, investment negotiations, player transfers etc. Despite owning 25% of the club Levy does not have the wealth to contribute to injecting funds himself. Levy not retaining a non-executive seat on the board is telling - he has noone to represent his interests (as the second largest shareholder).
The statement this morning was a message of intent from ENIC (Lewis kids). They are not selling in this current phase. I expect naming rights linked to minority share investment to boost the football operations in the short term, and then longer term a sale when the club is worth even more. Being competitive in the PL and CL, with no PSR restrictions, and winning one of them, would see the club value hit £5B IMO.