• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Management ENIC

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

ENIC In or ENIC Out


  • Total voters
    208
For better or worse, Levy was able to point at periods of success and there was enough smoke to feign design. Actually, he was simply a monomaniacal charlatan.
Levy *knew* he was balancing ambition on the pitch and in the transfer market against self-imposed financial restrictions.

70% of these statements from the new guard trying to blame Levy for not wanting to win, not being connected to the fans, blah blah is just transparent PR bollocks, but my worry is that 30% they've actually convinced themselves that they can do the same thing and achieve different results.

It may be an unpopular stance but I can given the context (that we have been given) understand Vinai fumbling a bit. He was bought in for one job and quickly got shunted into the top dog role and has found out that everything ran through 2 people that were fired in the process of his own promotion. So there being chaos behind the scenes as he is effectively rebuilding (or building given that it seemingly hasn't existed since the pandemic at least) a structure for the entire operation. It doesn't excuse the lack of decisions made. But it gives some context imo.
Vinai is not, never has been, and never will be anything but an empty suit. He's useless and a Gooner and we should get rid of him, but he's strictly a placeholder for the actual power at the club, and in that sense he's really not worth paying attention to.

I do agree with that. Lange has far less excuse than Vinai, Lange just needs to be gone.
The thing that's confusing to me is that Levy hired Lange. We've got this whole new guard that have been swept in as a new era, and I do think in some sense Levy was forced by the newly empowered and increasingly rebellious Lewis heirs to bring on a proper technical director after the FIFA mess with Paratici, but it's Levy who hired him.

Why would the Lewises, Charrington and Vinai not want to start fresh? What is it that weds them to this bizarre dual sporting director role?
 
The thing that's confusing to me is that Levy hired Lange. We've got this whole new guard that have been swept in as a new era, and I do think in some sense Levy was forced by the newly empowered and increasingly rebellious Lewis heirs to bring on a proper technical director after the FIFA mess with Paratici, but it's Levy who hired him.

Why would the Lewises, Charrington and Vinai not want to start fresh? What is it that weds them to this bizarre dual sporting director role?
I think that it is as simple as not blowing everything up all at once. Collecot is after all still at the club and he was one of the three heads of the dragon with Levy and Cullen.

I do however think that Lange is not long for the job. All the reports that have come out today have moved away from working alongside him being a requirement. Now it is just option A. If they can find someone that they feel can do Lange's scouting as well as handle transfers and squad building they will shunt him.
 
As a conversation, it lasted only a few minutes at most but as a snapshot of the decline of Tottenham Hotspur, it could have told the story of an era.
Tottenham had just drawn 0-0 away at AS Monaco in the Champions League on October 22, holding on for a point they hardly deserved. After full-time, in the corridors of the Stade Louis II, the players of both teams were making their way out when staff overheard Eric Dier, the former Tottenham defender, now of Monaco, deep in discussion with Djed Spence.
Dier had always looked out for Spence at Spurs, like a mentor of sorts, convinced he would thrive if he could just straighten out some of his habits. With Spence on the bench against Monaco, Dier seemed frustrated and was reminding him of that advice when Johan Lange, Tottenham’s technical director, walked past and detected the tone of the conversation. “At last!” Lange said with a smile. “If only we had more of that.”
Roberto De Zerbi, manager of Tottenham Hotspur, looking on during a warm-up.
De Zerbi was brought in at the end of March and managed to save Tottenham from relegationKIERAN MCMANUS/TOTTENHAM HOTSPUR FC/SHUTTERSTOCK
Tottenham’s collapse has been a tale of the players who left and were never replaced and of the directors too complacent to notice. They are an example of how corrosive a culture of apathy can be and how far it can spread, from the executive suites at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium to the training pitches at Hotspur Way. In a game so weighted towards the elite, they are a warning of how fast one of the wealthiest clubs in the world can unravel when it believes expertise is expendable and status locked in.

Top stories​

  1. 1

    Trump: Iran deal will be ‘great and meaningful’ or I’ll walk away

    Middle East
  2. 2
    NEW

    Don’t judge us for taking Russian passports — we want to survive

    Russia-Ukraine war
  3. 3
    NEW

    Worth the wait — the gay couple breaking barriers in Catholic Poland

    Europe
  4. 4
    NEW

    Five brilliant TV shows you may have missed

    TV & Radio
  5. 5
    NEW

    Nuno Espirito Santo facing sack after crisis talks with West Ham

    Football
According to Deloitte, Tottenham were the ninth-richest club in the world last season, and their immense advantages meant none of those failings alone would have left them one defeat away from a first relegation in nearly 50 years. As one experienced Premier Leaguesporting director put it, a club like Tottenham “can make a shitload of shit decisions and still not be this shit”. But stirred together, bit by bit, in a league never less forgiving of mediocrity, those failings curdled into the one thing neither history nor revenue could hide: a chronic lack of quality on the pitch.

Levy ousted after five-year drift​

On the morning of September 4 last year, Daniel Levy drove past the pristine putting greens inside the training ground of which he had ordered the building and thought he was starting just another day. It was a Thursday, the transfer window had just closed, and Levy had meetings in his diary for the end of that week. The first was with Peter Charrington, a long-time adviser to the Lewis family, Tottenham’s owners, who had been appointed to the board six months earlier. That meeting was Levy’s last. After 24 years as Tottenham’s chairman, he has never been back at Hotspur Way and never seen another game inside the stadium. Even Levy’s office belongings, and those of his wife, Tracy, who worked as his personal assistant, were delivered to them both in a van.
For Tottenham, Levy’s departure was the hiss at the end of the stick of dynamite but the dynamite was also out of the box, unpacked, with the detonator lying around nearby. Levy’s Spurs wasn’t working. In his last six seasons after they reached the 2019 Champions Leaguefinal, Tottenham made the Premier League’s top four only once. In his last full season, Tottenham finished 17th, which should have been the final danger sign, except Spurs sacked Ange Postecoglou while also swallowing his narrative whole, about prioritising the Europa League. But Tottenham were in trouble before that European run kicked in. On January 30, two months before the Europa League knockout stage, Tottenham were already 15th in the Premier League.
Son Heung-min and Ange Postecoglou hold up the UEFA Europa League trophy during a parade.
The Europa League win papered over plenty of cracks as Spurs finished 17thGEORGE TEWKESBURY/TOTTENHAM HOTSPUR FC/SHUTTERSTOCK
Levy and the Lewis family had overseen a period of drift beyond league positions too. The hierarchy prioritised pop concerts, Amazon documentaries, go-karting tracks and lucrative pre-season tours, which put football “further and further from the centre of things”, one present official said, and irritated the players, like Pierre-Emile Hojbjerg, who was fined two weeks’ wages for refusing to play in a post-season friendly in Melbourne in 2024. Morale among staff was low, with many fed up with the top-down way of working.
Football departments cut during the pandemic were also never fully restored. Scouting was trimmed back, nominally in favour of a more centralised, data-led approach overseen by Lange and the brief chief football officer Scott Munn, but which resulted in fewer eyes on fewer players. The academy, which has yielded only 26 Premier League minutes this season, was neglected, “one of the lights turned off during Covid that never got turned back on”. Even in non-football areas like marketing, staff describe the club as completely ignorant about the Tottenham fan base, in a way that would be deemed unthinkable in other industries. “Everyone had to get their head around everything,” a source said. “It was completely bonkers.”

Rebuilding the plane in mid-air​

Pointing fingers only goes so far, not least because the old regime is also the new regime, with the Lewis family still at the top. Joe Lewis, now 89, handed the reins over to his children, Vivienne and Charles, years ago while Vivienne’s son-in-law, Nick Beucher, has been closest to football decisions this season of the three. Beucher speaks regularly to Vinai Venkatesham, the former Woolwich director and now Spurs chief executive, who replaced Levy in charge of football operations and sits just above Lange, the club’s technical director.
Tottenham Hotspur fans protest club ownership with signs reading GET OUT OF OUR CLUB ENIC OUT and a scarf that says 24 YEARS TIME FOR CHANGE.
Fans have repeatedly made their feelings towards the ownership clearJAMES GILL – DANEHOUSE/GETTY IMAGES
All were in situ before Levy left, including Venkatesham, who arrived in April and said publicly “Daniel was a key part of the decision” to come. Levy’s tenure yielded an increase in revenue of more than 150 per cent and established Tottenham among Europe’s elite. Bottom line, they were never in serious danger of relegation. Again and again this season, that point has been made by those loyal to Levy: “This would never have happened under Daniel.”
The real problem after Levy’s departure was the gaping holes in leadership positions and the vacuum of knowledge and experience. The club had basically been run by three people — Levy, the long-serving executive director Donna-Maria Cullen, who also left last year, and Matthew Collecott, the chief finance and operating officer, who has remained on the board — each of them with huge remits. Levy and Cullen’s exits meant hiring not one or two executives, but a whole pack of them, mid-season, while navigating the Premier League and Champions League. Venkatesham told colleagues they were “trying to rebuild a plane mid-air”. Or, as one source close to the hierarchy put it: “We basically needed a year without the football.”
The result was 13 new heads of department in the past 12 months, and some of them took time to arrive. Venkatesham told colleagues in September a performance director was the first position he wanted to fill, but after the recruitment process and gardening leave, Dan Lewindon, previously of City Football Group, joined the day Thomas Frank was sacked. The new director of football operations, Rafi Moersen, who is also seen as key to the rebuild, particularly around transfers, isn’t starting until the middle of June.
Others appointments were just misjudged. Munn, whose job it was to overhaul the medical and scouting department as chief football officer, lasted less than two years after joining in 2023 while Adam Brett, director of performance services, came and went in a year. Fabio Paratici was as unreliable as the Tottenham players’ hamstrings. He was in (2021), out (2023), half-in (2024), job-sharing (2025) and out again (2026), his final spell as co-sporting director cut short after only three months, when he returned to Italy to be closer to his children.
Fabio Paratici, managing director of Tottenham Hotspur, walking on the field at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium.
Paratici’s in-and-out role has been symbolic of the instability at TottenhamTOTTENHAM HOTSPUR FC/SHUTTERSTOCK
Levy and Paratici were drivers of high standards and some believe Tottenham became a more amateur place without them, a “club full of No2s,” as one long-time former employee put it. Levy’s obsessive nature is well documented, but Paratici was a stickler for standards too. He hit the roof on a trip to Leeds United once, unhappy about the dining facilities, and when new signings first arrived at Hotspur Way, Paratici always rolled out the red carpet, determined to make the welcome feel first-class. The club will make further executive appointments this summer and will consider bringing former players back for the right roles, after Toby Alderweireld told The Times last week he would love to return. Ben Davies is very well thought of and there is a belief he will step up after he finishes playing, either into a coaching or strategic position.

Deferring on the big decisions​

Paratici first proposed Igor Tudor as a contingency plan in November, after a dispiriting defeat at home to Fulham, in the event they had to remove Frank as head coach. Paratici’s doubts around Frank caused tension in the Tottenham hierarchy, especially as Venkatesham and Lange were deeply supportive. Both had reason to be, even beyond Frank’s positivity and record at Brentford. Lange and Frank started out together at Lyngby in Denmark while Venkatesham was informed by his experience at Woolwich, when they stuck by Mikel Arteta. In the November international break, Venkatesham, Lange and Paratici flew out to the Bahamas for a meeting with the Lewises and Beucher, when the key message was that early bumps were to be expected. Frank just needed more time.
Tottenham Hotspur and Villarreal CF directors, including Vinai Venkatesham, Chief Executive Officer at Tottenham Hotspur, and Non-Executive Director Peter Charrington, clapping during the UEFA Champions League match.
From left: Vivienne Lewis, Charles Lewis, Venkatesham and CharringtonMARC ATKINS/GETTY IMAGES
With all the upheaval in leadership positions, Venkatesham and Lange were naive enough to hope the football would take care of itself. As early as October, the idea of a transition season under Frank had been accepted internally, but nobody envisaged anything more drastic. In that context, disarray off the pitch led to a deferring of key decisions on it, not least in relation to the position of Frank. Even as performances and Frank’s relationship with the fans nosedived at the turn of the year, there was a blind insistence on calm over more chaos. Others frame it less generously, insisting Tottenham decision-makers were just too complacent to confront the possibility of relegation. Even in March, with the team in freefall, officials were refusing to use the word relegation, referring to it as “the r-word” instead.
At every key juncture this season, Tottenham were two or three steps behind. In the middle of January, after the 2-1 loss at home to West Ham, the club discussed sacking Frank but decided he could survive the season. By the end of the January transfer window, with Tottenham eight points above the relegation zone, Lange signed only one senior player, Conor Gallagher, because he felt there would be better options available in the summer. In February, they believed they could risk Tudor as an interim coach, with a view to making a proper, permanent appointment in June. At the end of March, they finally turned to Roberto De Zerbi, on a £12million salary, with seven games to go and the team only two points above the relegation zone.
Venkatesham’s position is believed to be secure this summer but Lange’s future is less certain. Plan A is for more of a technical director focused on transfers to come in alongside Lange again, but it would depend who that person is and what they want the structure to be.

Young, mobile and malleable​

In the summer of 2024, after Tottenham had finished fifth in the table in their first season without Harry Kane, Cristian Romero asked Postecoglou why the club were signing only young players. He should not have been surprised. After a cluster of underwhelming, expensive deals between 2019 and 2024 — Tanguy Ndombele (£63million from Lyon) and Giovani Lo Celso (£55million from Real Betis) among them — Levy wanted to return to a recruitment policy that had served Spurs well in the previous decade: players who were young, mobile and malleable.
That shift suited Lange, who brought Rob Mackenzie with him as chief scout when he joined Spurs from Aston Villa in 2023, and was hired on his strengths to drive a more data-led, youth-focused approach. Postecoglou wanted Pedro Neto, Antoine Semenyo and Gallagher in 2024 but got two 18-year-olds in Archie Gray and Lucas Bergvall, as well as Dominic Solanke, Kane’s replacement, the only signing that summer older than 20. Over the past two seasons, Tottenham have made 14 permanent signings in total. Their average age was 20.7, and half of them were teenagers.
The shift also suited Tottenham’s tight wage structure. The club have regularly been in the top six on spending on transfers in the past ten years and, remarkably, sit first for net spend in the past two seasons, even ahead of Woolwich. But wages are the key to attracting proven quality and, in that area, Spurs have been much less generous, with the wage-to-revenue ratio, according to Deloitte in 2024, the lowest in the Premier League.
Gallagher was seen as unattainable for Postecoglou, when he joined Atletico Madrid instead, and Spurs wouldn’t even compete for Frank’s favourite, Bryan Mbeumo, when Manchester United approached Brentford last summer. Even Romero’s frustration has in part been driven by wages. After Argentina won the World Cup in 2022, he complained he was one of the only Argentinian players not to be given a pay rise.
Tottenham officials say they are already loosening the wage structure after Romero was given a new four-year contract in August before Gallagher joined as the club’s highest-paid player in January. But the search for young, mobile and malleable targets has delivered a squad short of experience, leadership and quality.
For Frank, who struggled with disciplinary issues, the lack of personality was particularly problematic. According to those close to Frank, he knew Romero was a far from ideal choice of captain last summer, but felt the squad offered no alternatives. Tudor was shocked at how little the team talked, both on and off the pitch. One young player told his agent he wanted to arrange a team bonding barbecue only to give up on the idea, because he didn’t think it was “his place” or “the done thing”.
Cristian Romero lifts the Europa League trophy alongside Micky van de Ven during Tottenham Hotspur's victory parade.'s victory parade.
Frank had reservations about the appointment of Romero to the Tottenham captaincyDYLAN MARTINEZ/REUTERS
Romero’s trip to Argentina for treatment last week was not unusual. Several players have used external specialists and national team doctors to recover from injury, with trust in Tottenham’s medical department eroded after a harrowing two years. Even in the treatment room, upheaval has had an effect.
In a fascinating study called New Coach, New Risks? published last year, researchers analysing a Croatian top-flight club for eight seasons found there was a 35.4 per cent increase in injuries in the first four weeks after a change of coach. Upheaval, they said, created a permanent first-day feel, where new coaches overtrain players to make an impact and players overstretch to try to impress. Frank squeezed in more sessions — tactical ones that bored the players — while Tudor’s decision to do running drills in February, during a period with midweek Champions League games, was described by a source close to the dressing room as “mental”.
The 1,549 days missed this season by Spurs players because of injury is by far the most in the Premier League but it was the quality of those players that was so sorely missed. Solanke, James Maddison, Dejan Kulusevski, Wilson Odobert, Rodrigo Bentancur and Destiny Udogie — all likely starters — have hardly played, leaving a paper-thin squad, ill equipped for the demands of European football, relying on back-ups when the pressure was highest.
Frank was so underwhelmed by the quality of his squad, he told colleagues that Pedro Porro was the only one who could play for a top club. De Zerbi has had to fight relegation with Mathys Tel, Richarlison and Randal Kolo Muani up front.
James Maddison of Tottenham Hotspur is stretchered off the field due to an injury.
Maddison injured his ACL in a pre-season game in August last year…CHUNG SUNG-JUN/GETTY IMAGES
Dejan Kulusevski, with a leg brace and crutches, stands on a football pitch and smiles.
While Kulusevski has not played a minute this seasonADAM DAVY/PA
Spurs first discussed De Zerbi as early as January, when results were wobbling under Frank and the Italian was known to be wavering at Marseille. On March 31, he took the job nobody wanted and made it work, the wins and confidence trickling back and the metrics pointing to more of a mid-table team, rather than a relegated one. Just in time. Asked why De Zerbi wasn’t appointed sooner, the answer that comes from the club is that he needed “heavy persuasion”, and perhaps it should be obvious why: culture, ambition, experience, stability, quality in the team, leaders in the dressing room. If only Tottenham had more of

If this article is true then Lewis sat on there hands for years when it was clear Levy, Cullen and co should have been fired ages ago. What a fucking mess.
Wow!!!!

I mean this is almost word for word confirming everything I've been posting on here for years!

Yet another article that could have been written by me 😆
 
I think that it is as simple as not blowing everything up all at once. Collecot is after all still at the club and he was one of the three heads of the dragon with Levy and Cullen.

I do however think that Lange is not long for the job. All the reports that have come out today have moved away from working alongside him being a requirement. Now it is just option A. If they can find someone that they feel can do Lange's scouting as well as handle transfers and squad building they will shunt him.
With a bit of luck, they will not overthink it and simply back de Zerbi to the hilt. Whoever he wants, they do their best to get that player.

It’s not ideal for a manager to have that freedom, but I have zero faith in any of the gimps currently in charge.
 
It may be an unpopular stance but I can given the context (that we have been given) understand Vinai fumbling a bit. He was bought in for one job and quickly got shunted into the top dog role and has found out that everything ran through 2 people that were fired in the process of his own promotion. So there being chaos behind the scenes as he is effectively rebuilding (or building given that it seemingly hasn't existed since the pandemic at least) a structure for the entire operation makes sense. It doesn't excuse the lack of decisions made. But it gives some context imo.

Lange however has no such grace period. He's been here for years. We have enough data to go on to decide that he is not up for it.
I don't believe for a second that the board decided to force Levy out on a whim. Vinai and Charrington were brought in to replace Levy and Levy was held over in an attempt to provide a smooth transition over the summer. A month before he left he basically organized a farewell address with the Guardian, FFS.
 
Last edited:
It may be an unpopular stance but I can given the context (that we have been given) understand Vinai fumbling a bit. He was bought in for one job and quickly got shunted into the top dog role and has found out that everything ran through 2 people that were fired in the process of his own promotion. So there being chaos behind the scenes as he is effectively rebuilding (or building given that it seemingly hasn't existed since the pandemic at least) a structure for the entire operation makes sense. It doesn't excuse the lack of decisions made. But it gives some context imo.

Lange however has no such grace period. He's been here for years. We have enough data to go on to decide that he is not up for it.
We should never, ever hire Gooners.

He needs to go.
 

View: https://x.com/jackpittbrooke/status/2058804528648994869?s=46&t=fbqxNuG9CT4qTaiJx8mBjg

The funny thing about these end of season reviews/hit pieces that JPB and Matt Jizslaw have just put out is that you know they had written them before the final game.

They just needed to hammer harder or tone it down slightly based on the result

Would be curious to read Charington's "relegation draft". And I'm sure Jack had an entire relegation article ready to go too.
 
I don't believe for a second that the board decided to force Levy out on a whim. Vinai and Charrington were brought in to replace Levy and Levy was held over in an attempt to provide a smooth transition over the summer. A month before he left he basically organized a farewell address with the Guardian, FFS.

If Levy didn't know it, the Lewis Family did.

It was absolutely a power struggle being played out in public and it wouldn't surprise me if it spanned decisions around the hiring and firing that summer
 
I don't believe for a second that the board decided to force Levy out on a whim. Vinai and Charrington were brought in to replace Levy and Levy was held over in an attempt to provide a smooth transition over the summer. A month before he left he basically organized a farewell address with the Guardian, FFS.
Yeah it was clearly planned based on the results of the audit. The Lewis' felt he was doing a bad job and last summer was planned as a transition window.

I think Levy knew he was losing his grip on the club after the audit and Vinai coming in, changes to the board, etc. Sacking Postecoglou was the first time he didn't single handedly take ownership of a managerial change in a statement - it was clear something was afoot. I also think the increased publicity was a direction from up high: Vinai clearly felt the club needed to be more transparent, hence the chummy wine chats and whatnot.

But I also don't think he had any idea he'd get offed so unceremoniously the second the window closed. Levy's the most stubborn cunt around - you think he'd just be doing business as usual in the transfer window and agreeing to 69 with Vinai on camera if he knew he was getting his P45 a few weeks later? No chance. He'd have been kicking up a stink and going mental behind the scenes if he knew how little time he had left.
 
With a bit of luck, they will not overthink it and simply back de Zerbi to the hilt. Whoever he wants, they do their best to get that player.

It’s not ideal for a manager to have that freedom, but I have zero faith in any of the gimps currently in charge.
Agree to an extent, but this is why we're in this mess. A Frankenstein mess of a squad with managers who play culturally 180° from one to the next. Hopefully, this Dortmund lad retrospectively make RDZ's type of football, the primary footballing principle, and when he inevitably leaves, we get a plug and play manager like Bournemouth, Brentford and Brighton do, and City will. Keep the footballing principles and profile of player the same and cause as little disruption as possible long-term.
 
Agree to an extent, but this is why we're in this mess. A Frankenstein mess of a squad with managers who play culturally 180° from one to the next. Hopefully, this Dortmund lad retrospectively make RDZ's type of football, the primary footballing principle, and when he inevitably leaves, we get a plug and play manager like Bournemouth, Brentford and Brighton do, and City will. Keep the footballing principles and profile of player the same and cause as little disruption as possible long-term.
Yeah - the absolute minimum the club need to do is stop jerking from style to style. We'll never be as good at data-led recruitment as Brighton or Brentford, or as streamlined behind the scenes, but at least recruiting managers with a similar approach instantly gives us some continuity and a we can instil some long term squad building.
 
The January window didn't exactly show ambition. Charington wrote September in the letter

"Last September, we recognised that something seismic had to change at Spurs."

Still we sold Brennan and only bought Gallagher and Souza in January, despite a crisis.

Let's see where we are when the window closes in September. I'm not convinced.
 
The January window didn't exactly show ambition. Charington wrote September in the letter

"Last September, we recognised that something seismic had to change at Spurs."

Still we sold Brennan and only bought Gallagher and Souza in January, despite a crisis.

Let's see where we are when the window closes in September. I'm not convinced.
It's cos they decided to hold fire until the summer cos Jan is a shit market - hence Lange's smug message about not making "stress purchases" and showing discipline. It was incredibly risky and stupid given our predicament, but there's a reason the only club that seems to regularly do massive business in Jan is Man City who have an infinite money glitch. For normal clubs it's a shite window unless you're willingly to massively overpay or are desperate.

The pressure is on even more to spend in the summer though. You can't pretend you're clever for not over-spending in Jan then act thrifty in the following window.
 
Levy *knew* he was balancing ambition on the pitch and in the transfer market against self-imposed financial restrictions.

70% of these statements from the new guard trying to blame Levy for not wanting to win, not being connected to the fans, blah blah is just transparent PR bollocks, but my worry is that 30% they've actually convinced themselves that they can do the same thing and achieve different results.


Vinai is not, never has been, and never will be anything but an empty suit. He's useless and a Gooner and we should get rid of him, but he's strictly a placeholder for the actual power at the club, and in that sense he's really not worth paying attention to.


The thing that's confusing to me is that Levy hired Lange. We've got this whole new guard that have been swept in as a new era, and I do think in some sense Levy was forced by the newly empowered and increasingly rebellious Lewis heirs to bring on a proper technical director after the FIFA mess with Paratici, but it's Levy who hired him.

Why would the Lewises, Charrington and Vinai not want to start fresh? What is it that weds them to this bizarre dual sporting director role?
Charington wrote. "Last September, we recognised that something seismic had to change at Spurs. "

They've known since September that we had a shit organisation. Now it's June soon and we still have the same shit organisation. No vision, no strategy, no plan, as usual.
 
Last edited:
Charington wrote. "Last September, we recognised that something seismic had to change at Spurs. "

They've known since September that we had I shit organisation. Now it's June soon and we still have the same shit organisation. No vision, no strategy, no plan, as usual.
At least we have a strong and competent manager in place, rather than the Danish hockey player sitting in the cuckold chair whilst these idiots run amok. RDZ will literally hunt them down if deals are bungled…. I expect to see the first black eye before the end of June. Hopefully that smug patsy Lange - the pro Frank non entity
 
At least we have a strong and competent manager in place, rather than the Danish hockey player sitting in the cuckold chair whilst these idiots run amok. RDZ will literally hunt them down if deals are bungled…. I expect to see the first black eye before the end of June. Hopefully that smug patsy Lange - the pro Frank non entity
Hockey players are usually tough. Maybe not Danish ones, since they suck at hockey.
 
Back
Top