The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Does anyone actually believe those numbers for PSG? I'm sure their average attendance is probably only about 40k.
They really are the French equivalent of Man City.
Their owner probably goes wild in the club shop every match day between ordering 400,000 litres of orange juice and 80,000 portions of chips.
But it's relative, if the market adjusts so that transfer fees and wages are lower we won't have to spend more but will still have an advantage because we have higher ratio we are able to spend of earned income. He may well do what you say and then his glee club will have absolutely no place left to hide. One way or other we get end game.Thing that I don't get is why people aren't expecting Levy to adjust spending down just because other clubs have to for FFP.
If the market spends less, the ENIC/Levy model will 100% adjust down as well and we will still want to avoid spending on a top tier wage bracket for players.
Thing that I don't get is why people aren't expecting Levy to adjust spending down just because other clubs have to for FFP.
If the market spends less, the ENIC/Levy model will 100% adjust down as well and we will still want to avoid spending on a top tier wage bracket for players.
But it's relative, if the market adjusts so that transfer fees and wages are lower we won't have to spend more but will still have an advantage because we have higher ratio we are able to spend of earned income. He may well do what you say and then his glee club will have absolutely no place left to hide. One way or other we get end game.
![]()
It's even more nuanced than that because in fairness to all it may not even be on ENIC because for their plan to work it depends on the billion to one shot that the EPL and UEFA actually rigorously enforced FFP/PSR and don't bottle it .End game is optmistic.
There would still be people in here celebrating 5th with the 7th highest wage bracket or something similar. Claiming it's a huge underdog achievement against giants that we shouldn't feel entitled to compete with.
It's even more nuanced than that because in fairness to all it may not even be on ENIC because for their plan to work it depends on the billion to one shot that the EPL and UEFA actually rigorously enforced FFP/PSR and don't bottle it .
![]()
It's even more nuanced than that because in fairness to all it may not even be on ENIC because for their plan to work it depends on the billion to one shot that the EPL and UEFA actually rigorously enforced FFP/PSR and don't bottle it .
![]()
Tbf their plan is also to not go bust
I'm not sure the same could be said of Everton's owners, for example, as much as their fans want to paint us as being part of some evil controlling 'cartel'
it seems like clubs in PSR trouble for the year to 30 June 2024 have found a new way around the regulations. Everton, Villa, Newcastle and others are selling squad club-trained players to each other for amounts less than 10mil. This means the selling club get to recognise 100% of the transfer fee in their books now prior to 30 June whilst the buying club get to amortise the purchase price over the players contract, say 5 years.
So for a 10mil player the selling club gets 10mil profit to balance the PSR now and the buying club only incurs 2mil each year for 5 years.
Understand the current PSR gets scrapped at 30 June 2025 and replaced with regulations similar to UEFA which require squad costs not to exceed 80%. I wonder if these shonky deals these clubs are doing now to save their current year will help or hinder them under the UEFA regulations?
These clubs are playing with fire. This is no different to what Juve and Barca did 5 years ago with the inflated Pjanic/Arthur swap deal which saw Juve docked 15 points, Agnelli banned for 2 years and Paratici banned for 30 months.Everton, Villa, Newcastle and others are selling squad club-trained players to each other for amounts less than 10mil. This means the selling club get to recognise 100% of the transfer fee in their books now prior to 30 June whilst the buying club get to amortise the purchase price over the players contract, say 5 years.
I think the PL has done something in terms of limiting the amortisation to 5 years even if the players contract is 7-10 years. Of course, the clubs who are well known for skullduggery in regulation Compliance like Chelsea will probably find another way around this to try and un-level the playing field again.Side note - something has to be done about this amortising & PSR nonsense. The idea that Chelsea can spend a billion "legitimately" by spreading the players' contracts out over 10 years and funding it with home grown academy talent that all goes directly onto the revenue is a farce. Even the new UEFA squad rules won't change that aspect of it, as far as I'm aware.
You're right, they have. I was mid rant and kept it higher for dramatic effectI think the PL has done something in terms of limiting the amortisation to 5 years even if the players contract is 7-10 years. Of course, the clubs who are well known for skullduggery in regulation Compliance like Chelsea will probably find another way around this to try and un-level the playing field again.
We need to build a hotel and a couple blocks of apartments first, THEN we are cooking!!!