Fifa loses free-to-air World Cup TV battle

  • The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Johnboy40

Where's the Kaboom?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-23288211

Fifa and Uefa have lost an appeal against a European ruling that the World Cup and Euro Championships must be shown on free-to-air TV in the UK.
In 2011, the European General Court said the UK could keep the events on a list of "protected" events of national sporting interest broadcast for free.
It means the two tournaments cannot be sold exclusively to pay-TV firms.
Fifa and Uefa had appealed, after saying they could not sell the events fairly for their real value.
But the European Court of Justice - Europe's Supreme Court - has now said the original decision in the General Court (formerly Court of First Instance) in 2011 was correct.
Big money
The BBC and ITV had already secured the rights to broadcast the football World Cup finals in 2014, and they were guaranteed of being shown free-to-air.
But there had been fears that moves towards a pay-TV model would have been in place in time for the 2018 World Cup in Russia, should Fifa and Uefa have won their case.The court said it "dismisses the appeals brought by Fifa and Uefa in their entirety".
Fifa earned a minimum of $2bn (£1,3bn) in TV and media rights deals for the South Africa 2010 World Cup, and Uefa makes hundreds of millions of dollars from the sale of its TV rights to the European Championships.
Pay-TV rights for football are currently big business, as seen by the huge sums paid by BT Sports and Sky in the latest Premier League TV deal, which kicks off in the forthcoming 2013/14 season.
BT has spent £738m over three years for the rights to 38 live matches a season. and Sky paid £2.3bn for 116 matches a season.
'Major importance'
Even if Fifa had won its case, World Cup finals games featuring England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland would have remained free to watch in the UK, as would the opening games, semi-finals and the final.
But it was the other dozens of games featuring non-UK teams that Fifa was disputing - and had argued that matches such as these should not be shown for free in the UK.

Fifa and Uefa had argued th
that the current set-up interfered with their ability to sell television rights at the best commercial price they could get in the marketplace.
However, the UK argued that all the 64 World Cup finals matches and 31 European Championship matches were an important part of the list of national sporting "crown jewels", that have to be made available to the whole population to watch on terrestrial television.
And the court agreed, saying that European states were able to select broadcast events, "which they deem to be of major importance for society" and show them for free.
Otherwise it "would deprive a substantial proportion of the public of the possibility of following those events on free television".
'Rebuffed'
Belgium was also successful in keeping the rights to World Cup and European Championship matches on free-to-air services.
Despite the more than two-year wait for the result of the appeal by Fifa and Uefa, many experts had expected the decision to go against them.
"The result means that Uefa and Fifa have now reached the end of their European Court journey," said Daniel Geey, a TV sports rights expert at Field Fisher Waterhouse law firm"Their aim was to try and secure concessions to market some of their World Cup and Euro matches to pay-TV channels in the UK and Belgium with the ultimate aim of maximising their revenues.
"The European courts have rebuffed such an approach."
The case has been working its way through the European courts for the past five years, with Fifa and Uefa lodging legal papers just before the Euro 2008 football championships.
In its ruling the court said it was "for the [European] member states alone to determine the events which are of major importance" to their viewing publics.
It also said that all the matches in the final stages of the World Cup and Euros "actually attracted sufficient attention from the public to form part of an event of major importance".
The court also pointed out that the tournaments "in their entirety, have always been very popular among the general public and not only viewers who generally follow football matches on television".[/QUOTE]
 
Heard this earlier.

So sepp 'football is for everyone, that's why we're holding the World Cup in Russia and Qatar' Blatter clearly contradicts himself by trying to make it so the same people have to pay more just to watch their wretched tournaments on the TV.

I hope his whole Qatar business is the end of them. Major nations should pull teams out of qualifications. Then lets see how we'll they can market a tournament where the final is Qatar versus Guam
 
FIFA really are a laughing stock. They award Qatar the world cup in 2022 and then have to concede that the tournament should be played in the Winter as the Summer heat will be too much to bear.

So they did not consider this when appraising the potential host countries? Wonder why, the money grabbing shits......
 
anyone remember this beauty at Lokomotiv when Odemwingie went to west brom?

alone it's a good enough reason that russia shouldnt have got the world cup....

_48897794_banner.jpg
 
Slightly off topic but I still despair for the fabric of our game, which FIFA is determined to rip inside out.....

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/23351824

I can barely fathom the amount of disruption that this fuck up is going to cause, because of 50 greedy diplomats who have taken a wad of cash in their back pockets to vote for a tournament in Qatar; a country that has no kind of footballing legacy and will piss away billions of dollars creating an event that will ultimately benefit those who are fortunate enough to have 'Sheikh' as their first name. It is clear that FIFA was not concerned with the suitability, sustainability or even the credibility of these bids for the World Cup, through picking Qatar, a country which at the time had next to no sporting facilities to speak of, along with an obviously hostile climate presenting a major challenge. Qatar, a small but wealthy country of under 2 million people, easily fought off competition from nations such as Japan and the US, both countries with large populations who could have benefited from the spillover effects, as much as FIFA try to minimise them, of a major tournament.

The 'decision making process' for holding this tournament has become simply an auction, for any nation wishing for a month in the global commercial spotlight, under the guise of a football tournament.
 
Hold on... you're suggesting that the Qatar world cup hosting win was... corrupt?

SOMEONE TELL THE PRESS!!!!!

Screw FIFA and UEFA, but whoever thinks the FA and Prem wouldn't do the same if they were in that position is also misguided.
 
Back
Top Bottom