• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Ex-Spurs Player Harry Kane

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

I think I'd rather keep him for another year personally

Give us a year or so to find a replacement whether that be Toney or someone else, also give the new manager a year to settle and not have to deal with losing someone like Kane.

If he goes on a free then so be it.
So you would be fine if he walks for free and goes to say City or Manu for free when we can make money off of them?

Why not sell him and get that money to buy players?

Why not give the new manager money to spend rather than holding on to someone that will leave in a year? Wouldn't the manager be more unsettle if that happens?

What kind of logic is this you spouting LMAO.
 
So you would be fine if he walks for free and goes to say City or Manu for free when we can make money off of them?

Why not sell him and get that money to buy players?

Why not give the new manager money to spend rather than holding on to someone that will leave in a year? Wouldn't the manager be more unsettle if that happens?

What kind of logic is this you spouting LMAO.

You realised I've just answered EVERYTHING in the post you just quoted.

Yes I'd be absolutely fine to kick the can down the road and see where we are with him in a years time absolutely.
 
You realised I've just answered EVERYTHING in the post you just quoted.

Yes I'd be absolutely fine to kick the can down the road and see where we are with him in a years time absolutely.
Yea which is nonsense. That is why I'm asking what is the benefit of having him here for another year.

You said for the manager to settle? doesn't make sense and why when Kane is going to leave anyways a year later.

Money to spend after a year? Why don't we sell Kane NOW and use that money to buy FOR the new manager?

Don't you get what i'm saying? its not that hard.
 
Won't be leaving this summer unless it's a London club he goes to, got another baby on the way as well.

Most probably walking away next summer
 
Yea which is nonsense. That is why I'm asking what is the benefit of having him here for another year.

You said for the manager to settle? doesn't make sense and why when Kane is going to leave anyways a year later.

Money to spend after a year? Why don't we sell Kane NOW and use that money to buy FOR the new manager?

Don't you get what i'm saying? its not that hard.

It makes perfect sense, I've already explained the logic, you should go back over my posts if you seem confused, if you don't want to do that that's fine.

Your scenario kinda makes sense I guess but that isn't my preference and I think it leaves us in the shit next season, nevermind :thumbup:
 
It makes perfect sense, I've already explained the logic, you should go back over my posts if you seem confused, if you don't want to do that that's fine.

Your scenario kinda makes sense I guess but that isn't my preference and I think it leaves us in the shit next season, nevermind :thumbup:
I'm sorry, but your logic is flawed in so many ways. But I'll leave it at that.
 
If its Real they wont spend over 30m on someone over 30 years old. They never did.

They will wait it out and try to get him for free.

They will probably go for Haaland/Mbappe/Osimhen for that money.
I’m assuming he’ll go to City on a free. He’ll win five or six trophies and break Shearer’s record.

I think I’d prefer him to go to Madrid this summer (Sophie’s choice etc.) As you say though, maybe too financially prohibitive.
 
It just honestly infuriates me that Levy gets to put off the final catastrophic denouement of this saga for 12 more months, the entirety of which he will spend waging a whisper campaign against Kane.

Bad human beings operate this football club.
 
So you would be fine if he walks for free and goes to say City or Manu for free when we can make money off of them?

Why not sell him and get that money to buy players?

Why not give the new manager money to spend rather than holding on to someone that will leave in a year? Wouldn't the manager be more unsettle if that happens?

What kind of logic is this you spouting LMAO.
Because he could offer more in a season than the 75M fee. CL qualification generates more than that.

The risk if he goes for free is that we have no control of his new club, he might think Chelsea, after a year of Poch is a good fit or god forbid the other lot
 
Because he could offer more in a season than the 75M fee. CL qualification generates more than that.

The risk if he goes for free is that we have no control of his new club, he might think Chelsea, after a year of Poch is a good fit or god forbid the other lot
He'll be another year older then. Who knows what can happen in a year.

If he goes for free to whoever then I'll console myself with the fact we've had his absolute best years.

Personally I don't think he'll go anywhere that'll tarnish his time with us so that rules out the Chavs. Poch or no Poch.

Keep him until it's out of our hands.
 
Back
Top