So another one who celebrated beating Utd 3-0 in the league as hard as they celebrated beating Ajax.
Yeah, Kane played so it was the same. Jesus what a sad fan base.
mY nAmE iS sAmMy AnD i HaTeZ hArRy KaNe I dO

The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
So another one who celebrated beating Utd 3-0 in the league as hard as they celebrated beating Ajax.
Yeah, Kane played so it was the same. Jesus what a sad fan base.

Life will go on and there will still be a Tottenham Hotspur Football Club after Harry, whether that is at the end of this season, next season or in 5 or 6 years time if he finishes out his career here as a one club man.Nope, but city will break even more records with a player like Kane. Now Aguero is finished, they don’t have a 30 goal a season striker. With Kane they get that and they would dominate with him. Kane would also break records and win trophies, which will debunk the myth that he’s some sort of bottler. Spurs are a bunch of bottlers as a group, but if we had 11 Harry Kane’s, we wouldn’t be in this position. His attitude is first class. He’s head and shoulders above any Spurs player. His goal scoring record is stupendous. He leaves, this club reverts back to mid table it’s as simple as that
Bit harsh. I'm trying to look at this objectively. Although sammyspurs puts the point across in quite a jarring way, it's an opinion I'm prepared to consider all available evidence for to come to my own conclusion.
If Wes Brown contributed to those trophies then he deserves the acolades
Wes Brown was the Ben Davies of that side.He was never a great player. Averaged 25 games per season over 14 years.
He did start in the 08 final to be fair, but he is often my 'go to' example of a bang average player that won more trophies than some of the most talented footballers in history.
Sure he 'deserved them' as a playing part of those sides, but put him in a squad with 25 players of Wes Brown ability and they wouldn't have won very much.
Bit harsh. I'm trying to look at this objectively. Although sammyspurs puts the point across in quite a jarring way, it's an opinion I'm prepared to consider all available evidence for to come to my own conclusion.
I'm a massive fan of Kane, but in a way feel like Spurs suit his level. Becoming our all time top scorer and getting a statue is what I hope for him - but can't ignore the reality of his statistical track record be it goals scored per season, or input in big games.
My mind is never set in stone. Convince me otherwise, bring new arguments to the table. I could argue for or against Kane in different situations, but without considering the more negative side of things you won't be able to form a rounded opinion I would suggest.
He was never a great player. Averaged 25 games per season over 14 years.
He did start in the 08 final to be fair, but he is often my 'go to' example of a bang average player that won more trophies than some of the most talented footballers in history.
Sure he 'deserved them' as a playing part of those sides, but put him in a squad with 25 players of Wes Brown ability and they wouldn't have won very much.
I keep seeing Kane linked with Chelsea; I can’t see Levy selling to them, but if he did, and Kane was willing to take the silver, it would be on a par with Judas.Telling.
I thought everyone wanted Kane?
What will it be when City choose Haaland then?
“Kanes so good no one thinks hes worth his price”
![]()
Good luck with that.Tottenham striker and England captain Harry Kane, 27, is willing to join Spanish giants Barcelona, but the Nou Camp hierarchy would prefer to sign Borussia Dortmund's Norwegian forward Erling Braut Haaland, 20. (Sport)
I don't feel the need to convince you of anything. You and Sammy are the equivalent of Flat Earthers trying to convince us that Kane is gash. The majority of the rest of the world disagrees, even non Spurs fans
Take away Kane's goals and we don't qualify for the CL any season in the last 6 years and we aren't involved any titles races. We fell short in 16/17 because of injuries to Kane.
I think Kane ultimately has to leave to be appreciated by some. Same with Lloris.
In our last two finals we've played the best two teams in the World at the time.
There wouldn't even be a line to get over had it not been for Kane the past 6 or so years, why do we have to ignore all his contributions year in year out and whittle it down to those 3 cup finals he didn't score in, where the entire team shat the bed.
Which is above all down to his destructive tendency to play through injury and be a half-fit shadow of himself by the business end of the season.Just the point being - he has not proved himself to be the man of the hour in most crutial games.
I hate the thought of him joining another PL side and being booed when he comes to the Lane. Hopefully, if it does happen. our supporters will give him a great welcomeOn 2016/17 and 2017/18 we had the goalkeeper and back four that conceded the fewest goals in the league and we had a bloody good midfield too. We still didn’t win anything.
Harry is all but guaranteed to fill his boots with trophies and medals at either Chavs or Citeh so good luck to him if he goes down that route.
Man U possibly a more interesting challenge. If he went there and scored 20 league goals and they won the league for the first time in 9 years, he’s clearly the difference between winning and not winning the league as they’ve finished an average of 23 points behind the champions since Sir Alex departed on 2013. Not convinced they’re winning big anytime soon though, at least as long as Solskjaer is at the helm.
I know people defend Harry and his performances, his ambitions and what have you, with religious fervour, but I am at breaking point with him. I actually get angry just thinking about it. People bite their tongues on this, because they know what they will have to face, and sure, there are some trolls knocking around this place. I long for the days of a more mobile striker who can/will press, for starters. It will be less controversial to go into detail on this if he leaves.
Kane would be better served being less greedy, I think that's fair to say.
I know strikers are meant to be greedy, but are they meant to drop deep and follow play around the pitch just to get involved?
Perhaps if Kane stayed up front and stopped running round the pitch plugging gaps our awful midfield should be filling, it would be better for both Kane himself and the team.
How about player/chairman
Yeah because he's drawn out of attack to bolster the midfield.Greedy yet currently leads the way for assists...
Give your fucking head a wobble.