• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Ex-Spurs Player Harry Kane

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Probably just longs for the days when our best strikers were the likes of Armstrong, Iversen, Razieck, and Bent.

Nothing against Armstrong though. Always liked him.

Always thought he had it in him to be ‘Henry lite’ if we’d supported him, not rushed him back from injury after he’d settled and screwed him over, then the crowd didn’t help him subsequent as Francis didn’t speak to the press to explain…
 
While some of the 'flat track bully' stuff is over the top, if we had to play against Mancity, Chavs, Liverpool and if someone offered a front 3 of Son Kane Lucas or Lucas Son Salah, we all know which 3 would be more devastating.

Kane is very very good but just not as good as some think he is (or as bad as others think he is).
 
Wow, so Son scoring more than Kane is because of Kane

The cult has reached peak banter levels
Where did i say that?? It all contributes overall what other players do on the pitch. PEH shielding and winning the ball back contributes to son scoring. Reggie attacking down the left helps son score.
You keep looking at it in black and white and stop putting a slant on what i say thats not there.
P.s. a lot of sons goals have come from kane if you want to go down that road
 
What the entire fek is this thread, what are people actuslly arguing about?
It does prove one thing - that statistics can be twisted to fit any agenda!
I have to admit to just skimming this thread, nothing wrong with discussing and debating, I welcome it, but sometimes ..... :pochrolleyes:
I think we should consider ourselves lucky that we still have two of the best attackers in the business at our club, and if they get the service, the goals will come. My beef with Kane is for the shenanigans in trying to move.
 
If you're making up front threes from those four players I'd go Kane, Son, Salah ... why are we only allowed your imaginary options, that seems a bit arbitrary and meaningless.
Oh maybe i should have been clearer. Kept 2 attackers the same but replaced kane with salah (as they are both good goalscorers ) . If you are facing the better teams of the league, you'd prefer a trio of lucas, son, salah who will run and press for the whole game instead of having one of them be lethargic and slow.
 
It does prove one thing - that statistics can be twisted to fit any agenda!
I have to admit to just skimming this thread, nothing wrong with discussing and debating, I welcome it, but sometimes ..... :pochrolleyes:
I think we should consider ourselves lucky that we still have two of the best attackers in the business at our club, and if they get the service, the goals will come. My beef with Kane is for the shenanigans in trying to move.
100% this. I avoid this circular firing squad for the most part. I don't mind the debate I just wish the same people were not the ones saying the same thing in increasingly hysterical ways. Its boring. Kane is a fine player peak he was world class the injuries to my mind diminished him. I have felt for a few years we need to add a top class forward to make us better and ironically to extend Kanes career. Take the Euro final I honestly never felt he'd get the better of Chelini or Bonnucci against the very best been like that for a while where as pre injury I've seen him dominate Van Dyke
 
Back
Top