Finally someone gets it - been saying this for a long time...No lamer than winning with City, Chelsea or Liverpool.
The trophy dodgers are us, not Harry.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Finally someone gets it - been saying this for a long time...No lamer than winning with City, Chelsea or Liverpool.
The trophy dodgers are us, not Harry.
I knew this wouldn't be far behind today after years of saying he has to win any trophy
View: https://twitter.com/MailSport/status/1919365029884793083?t=ByDqAV2Ll2yZPMG-1pXApQ&s=19
I'm sure Harry won't be taking advice from some lads who look like they've never kicked a ball in their life
Don’t like defending the scousers but their trophies don’t have the stench that City and Chelsea trophies do in my opinion . Still wish they had never won them though
Winning the PL is objectively much more of an accomplishment.No lamer than winning with City, Chelsea or Liverpool.
The trophy dodgers are us, not Harry.
Perhaps, but there are plenty of utterly forgettable players that have multiple PL titles.
Perhaps, but there are plenty of utterly forgettable players that have multiple PL titles.
Is Jack Grealish better than Kane?
He’s won a title. The hoodoo is done. The only reason he doesn’t have a stacked trophy cabinet is because he played for us.
What crap.
The resdon he didn't win anything with us is because he amd his team mates failed to deliver, when we had what was objectively the best team in the land.,for 2 or 3 years.
You’re not Spurs fan, come onWhat crap.
The resdon he didn't win anything with us is because he amd his team mates failed to deliver, when we had what was objectively the best team in the land.,for 2 or 3 years.
Is this the only reason, or are you only saying this because you have an agenda against him because you and I know that this club do not win trophies and a lot of players have since won a trophy when they have left...so be honest in your analysis please.
Would you consider Ronnie Woolwork winning the Premier League in 2000-01 season starting just 4 games for United more of an accomplishment that Kane winning the Bundasliga this year? Let's say Kane comes back in a few years, signs for City and they win the title with Kane replacing Haaland for 5 mins at the end of every odd game. He would have his PL winners medal but who cares. As soon as he won something with Bayern the narrative was always going to be "it's a farmers league"...
Kane played in the best Spurs side for years, yes or no?
And by best I mean arguably with some of the best players in the PL for 2/3 years.
What is there to dispute in truth.
Thr bloke failed, as that spearhead striker to deliver at the most critical moments.
Those of you who want to dismiss that can do so.
Yeah win or lose it's a collective responsibility but ask yourself this question were we winning trophies pre Kane? Have we won trophies post Kane?
When you get the answer you should ask yourself why you're putting our lack of winning trophies all down to Kane...