• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Ex-Spurs Player Harry Kane

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

You are just being obtuse because it's dawning on you that Alli and Mason instead of Chadli and Eriksen isnt a terrible idea so you are scrambling for any angle that will paint me in a bad light.
LOL. Haven't even mentioned Chadli once. Yet, you've gauged that I believe he should play ahead of Mason and Alli.

Keep digging, Scooby.

I don't think anyone here needs to ''scramble'' to paint you in a bad light. You handle that for us all.

EDIT - Newsflash Gibbs, I was bigging up Mason before most had even heard of him. 4-5 years ago. I also suggested before the season started that I had a feeling Alli would break into the first team. But don't let that get in the way of your narrative.
 
Last edited:
LOL. Haven't even mentioned Chadli once. Yet, you've gauged that I believe he should play ahead of Mason and Alli.

Keep digging, Scooby.

I don't think anyone here needs to ''scramble'' to paint you in a bad light. You handle that for us all.

EDIT - Newsflash Gibbs, I was bigging up Mason before most had even heard of him. 4-5 years ago. I also suggested before the season started that I had a feeling Alli would break into the first team, But don't let that get in the way of your narrative.

The narrative is you are nit picking. You are praising the players in my preferred lineup.

Thanks for that.

The Lamelaphant in the room is you can't talk shit about a single player in my lineup. The whole team this season bar the cup games is looking like something I would pick because I would happily have Eriksen and Son etc in my team. Just not overload it with them.

Pick away. The embarrassing winger lolcats have melted away. There are no angles to attack my squad bar pace and experience.
 
The narrative is you are nit picking. You are praising the players in my preferred lineup.

Thanks for that.

The Lamelaphant in the room is you can't talk shit about a single player in my lineup. The whole team this season bar the cup games is looking like something I would pick because I would happily have Eriksen and Son etc in my team. Just not overload it with them.

Pick away. The embarrassing winger lolcats have melted away. There are no angles to attack my squad bar pace and experience.
So, you can admit that Chadli line you just threw at me is bollocks, yea?

I am praising the players of Tottenham Hotspur, you calling them the players of your preferred lineup just shows your arrogance that you think my praising of them reinforces a point you're making. It is possible to praise Bentaleb yet still think it's absurd to put him in a LAM role. Just like it is possible to defend Rose to the hilt and it not be to the detriment of my thoughts of Ben Davies, a fine player.

I can't talk shit about a single player in your lineup? Nor would I fucking want to. They're Spurs for fuck sake, I'd avoid it at all costs if I could (Townsend the only current exception and only because of his abilities, not his attitude or commitment). If only you'd allow Danny Rose the same courtesy.
 
LOL. Haven't even mentioned Chadli once. Yet, you've gauged that I believe he should play ahead of Mason and Alli.

Why are you ignoring the narrative you seem to be obsessed about?

I said at the end of the day this team is a lot like the one that played Utd where they didn't have a single goal on target while Bentaleb and Dembele were on the pitch. Who does that to Utd at home? In losses I see quality while people are calling Bentaleb a cunt.

That team had Eriksen and Chadli starting. So again...Avoiding questions. Why do you think I'm deluded thinking Alli and Mason can do as good if not better than Eriksen and Chadli?

It's a perfectly normal opinion that they can compete especially given they will be in their natural roles.
 
while people are calling Bentaleb a cunt.
Not me, so moot point.

In losses I see quality
Yet in wins you see the need to write essay after essay destroying one of our players who'd just put in a MOTM performance.

Why do you think I'm deluded thinking Alli and Mason can do as good if not better than Eriksen and Chadli?
Nope, didn't say that either.

Drowning in your own bollocks here, Scooby.

I'm not avoiding any questions. You are putting questions to me that I haven't given any sign of suggesting the premise. Your question is ''Why do you think I'm deluded thinking Alli and Mason can do as good if not better than Eriksen and Chadli?''...Answer, I don't. Haven't suggested anything like that. You're just making shit up and then accusing me of avoiding your nonsense.

Your delusions lie elsewhere. I've explicitly said them. You choose to ignore it because you can't handle the responses.
 
Apologies, I meant Monaco. A solid performance for a draw away to the previous years CL quarter-finalists, where Danny Rose played well. Yet, you've eviscerated him for a phantom error.

MOTM for a draw speaks volumes about my opinion. We should be blowing Monaco out of the water and if anything it CEMENTS my opinion of the only drawback of Eriksens game.

It proves a point that anyone can takes points of us when we overload the team with Lamela, Eriksen, Rose, Townsend etc.
 
I said at the end of the day this team is a lot like the one that played Utd where they didn't have a single goal on target while Bentaleb and Dembele were on the pitch. Who does that to Utd at home? In losses I see quality while people are calling Bentaleb a cunt.
I think you'll find they did have a goal on target (most goals are on target to be fair) & to qualify that, I think you'll also find that Bentaleb was on the pitch at the time of their "goal on target" because he played the suicide ball that exposed our whole defence.
 
MOTM for a draw speaks volumes about my opinion. We should be blowing Monaco out of the water and if anything it CEMENTS my opinion of the only drawback of Eriksens game.

It proves a point that anyone can takes points of us when we overload the team with Lamela, Eriksen, Rose, Townsend etc.
You've referred to the previous years CL QF's as ''anyone'' and that we should be blowing them out the water. If Juve and the Scum couldn't do it why the fuck do you think we have some god given right to do it?

Mental.
 
N

Drowning in your own bollocks here, Scooby.

I'm not avoiding any questions. You are putting questions to me that I haven't given any sign of suggesting the premise. Your question is ''Why do you think I'm deluded thinking Alli and Mason can do as good if not better than Eriksen and Chadli?''...Answer, I don't. Haven't suggested anything like that. You're just making shit up and then accusing me of avoiding your nonsense.

Your delusions lie elsewhere. I've explicitly said them. You choose to ignore it because you can't handle the responses.

You are not actually saying anything. You praised my lineups. While calling me deluded.

What do you wan't from me? haha. Just proves that I was right about the mob mentality. You don't even know what you are pushing against.
 
You are not actually saying anything. You praised my lineups. While calling me deluded.

What do you wan't from me? haha. Just proves that I was right about the mob mentality. You don't even know what you are pushing against.
So the Bentaleb LAM debate was in my mind? And the dropping of Eriksen and Lamela? And the Danny Rose debate? and the fact Monaco are anyone we should bury? Or we should be top?

Yea, not a clue what I'm arguing with. Nothing delusional there.

:pochfacepalm:
 
So the Bentaleb LAM debate was in my mind? And the dropping of Eriksen and Lamela? And the Danny Rose debate? and the fact Monaco are anyone we should bury? Or we should be top?

Yea, not a clue what I'm arguing with. Nothing delusional there.

:pochfacepalm:

You still are not saying anything because I said all of those players are welcome in my team. Get it yet?

Worst case scenario is i pick one over another by a small margin or would play them in a different position? I'm so delusional! Playing them in their original positions.

You twist that and shriek.

The worst thing you have on me is unproven. Would Bentaleb make a good AM? Is that worth mocking me?
 
Admin Admin can you please delete this thread and start an new one with gibbsy locked out of it? this thread is ruined
 
You still are not saying anything because I said all of those players are welcome in my team. Get it yet?

Worst case scenario is i pick one over another by a small margin or would play them in a different position? I'm so delusional! Playing them in their original positions.

You twist that and shriek.

The worst thing you have on me is unproven. Would Bentaleb make a good AM? Is that worth mocking me?
And the delusion appears again. This time of grandeur.

Nope, I'm out. This debate is exhibit A. If everyone else can see the dunce, and you can't, you know who it probably is...

G'night and god bless, Scooby. You crazy fool.
 
This is you being a "Lamela fan" weeks ago while I was defending him:

Joe clash.
"You named Lamela in every team you picked. I'm taking the unpopular stance here by saying he's nowhere near what we need at the moment! Agree or disagree!!!"

Kane:

Unless he develops an excellent footballing brain (not easy) he's too slow for the Prem as an out and out striker - that's for gibbs - a no. 9 for everyone else.
 
Back
Top