So what is it then ?
a great refinanced loan that costs £15m a year at 2% and means we can compete.
or
£600m debt, costing us 40 million a year for x number of years and we can’t really compete.
Seems to me that the first answer is used when they want our money and the second is used on days like today.
is it good debt or bad debt ? who gives a flying fuck. Its all fucking bollocks. ENIC have managed to actually create an element of our fan base who celebrate net spend and “profit”.
Who gives a shit about that, after 20 years of austerity, who wants more austerity ?
When the magic money tree delivers some decent players in the summer I might quote your post and say, you were right mate. But I somehow doubt that September next year will be any different to today. I don’t think the
attractiveness of Thursday night football along with our brilliantly constructed balance sheet will do anymore then see us all celebrate a letter from the modem day Rivaldo, hopefully I am really pessimistic!
sorry for my bluntness fella, not looking to row with anyone, just feel so fucked off with the same lame bollocks excuses.
The debt is almost all bonds, having been converted from bank debt about 6 months or so ago.
These bonds have a yield of about 2% and are repayable at various dates up to 30 years - average repayment date is 23 years.
The interest has to be paid each year.
As the bonds are private (not publicly traded) I can only guess at the terms of them - but it may well be that although repayment is in 20 years time we need to put into a different account an amount equal to the average annual capital payment - lets say £30m - each year, and that is not available to spend on players).
So its a long winded way of saying that we put aside £40m pa for the stadium - but our profits after tax last year were £100m or so and I am expecting higher profits to be announced end of March.
So net £60m - and transfers can be paid in various ways, often a £50m transfer for a player on a 5 year contract means paying £10m pa.
Over the last 15 years or so, up to last summer, our next transfer spend has been diddlysquat (= your austerity comment) , So even today the spend is huge by comparison with last 15 years.
And I guess next summer we'll spend another £100m+ on new players.
If you have the time there's a different thread on Spurs finances - and comparisons with other clubs finances Management - Tottenham Hotspur - Financials
