I'm grasping at straws here, but at least one silver lining of Conte's failure here at Spurs is that more of you will agree with my long-standing belief that the 5-3-2 formation is trash.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Massive release clause too. Same with De Zerbi.
Rotterdam is a lot closer than Turin though. And he wouldn't act like he was doing us a favour...Alasdair Gold is saying Arne Slot might be reluctant to leave due to his family and not wanting to take his daughter out of school. Sound familiar?
But didn't Conte play 343, with three forwards, not 352?I'm grasping at straws here, but at least one silver lining of Conte's failure here at Spurs is that more of you will agree with my long-standing belief that the 5-3-2 formation is trash.
What do you mean boring?
Absolute nonsense. He got Osimhen and Burak Yilmaz for Lille, the latter won them the League. The front 4 for Lille was Jonathan David, Bamba, Ikone and Yilmaz. 3 black players and 1 muslim.
This is just shit Parisian journalists fabricating stories to get him sacked from PSG. Fuck them.
Conte played it at Inter with Lukaku and Lautaro Martinez as the twin strike force and boy did they each score for fun.I'm grasping at straws here, but at least one silver lining of Conte's failure here at Spurs is that more of you will agree with my long-standing belief that the 5-3-2 formation is trash.
No, we don't. If anything, it's the other way around, given we're at 57% of wages to turnover and have more room to increase our wages than any other club.
No, we don't. If anything, it's the other way around, given we're at 57% of wages to turnover and have more room to increase our wages than any other club.
But people have narratives they need to stick to, so...
I'll say it again. Because once (ONCE ffs!) we bungled the manager appointment, it is now the norm?Appointment of the next manager to drag on most of the summer, and be used as the number one excuse why we have a giant nothing-burger of a transfer window...
Wait and see
Conversely, big bollocks could also be appointing someone who is unproven, but has all the ingredients. It's not like we can rock up to any manager anytime we like, even if they're managing Brighton or Wolves, and poach them. Once they have proven themselves there will be much more competition for them. And don't counter by telling me what Chelsea did, because that was just pissing away money. No club in its right mind acts that way.I don't particularly want Martinez, but even he's less of an absurd gamble than someone with one season and absolutely no PL experience.
As for Conte, Mourinho and Redknapp - we did employ them. And all with some success. Redknapp and Conte both turned us from ropey league teams to CL teams. Mourinho got us to a cup final. So did Redknapp.
So not sure what point you were making there. We shouldn't be taking gambles on total unknown quantities like Slot, Carrick or Kompany.
If we had big bollocks, we'd let them prove themselves at a Brighton, a Wolves etc and then pay the money and take them when they show they're not a flash in the pan.
Wait until the summer and then hope that a wild manager turns up at the training ground

Only before the cup game against Barcelona
I can't see how an unproven coach could have all the ingredients? That's like buying unlabled tins from the supermarket, they might be nice, they might be fermented fish.Conversely, big bollocks could also be appointing someone who is unproven, but has all the ingredients. It's not like we can rock up to any manager anytime we like, even if they're managing Brighton or Wolves, and poach them. Once they have proven themselves there will be much more competition for them. And don't counter by telling me what Chelsea did, because that was just pissing away money. No club in its right mind acts that way.
As I have said on a previous thread; Spurs will be looking over their shoulder at Villa without new owners in the near future.
In all fairness, the Rodgers and Potter comparison is apples and oranges. One got sacked while the other was poached. And you're not going to poach a manager whose team is a mess.Klopp?
Where did I mention him? LFC aren't in a mess, they just haven't refreshed the team enough, something that happened at Dotrmund too.
I was talking Rodgers and Potter.
Rodgers has left Leicester in an absolute mess, no question. He also left LFC in a mess, one win in 9, losing 6-1 at Stoke, they were all over the place. Team had stopped running for him too.
Potter left BHA in their highest ever league position, 4th, having got them to their highest finish.
And I checked the last 14 matches - scoring tons of goals, 81 pts over a season. Not saying they'd have got that, but he left them at their absolute peak.