The fact that turnover has decimated the PL managerial ranks is really the only reason your claim holds up.A straw man argument because neither myself orStarks are arguing to hire Rodgers.
That doesn’t change the fact that only Pep, Klopp and Arteta have had as much EPL success of the current crop.
Poch had one season and an 8th place finish when we hired him after leaving a dead last place Espanyol.
Harry had a couple of relegations before we hired him and had no success in the EPL. He was relegated again after he left us and left Birmingham City one from bottom.
BMJ. came to us from Waalwijk. Yeah, you’ll probably have to look them up.
My point was never that we have to hire a manager with a proven PL track record. As was pointed out, I put a vote in for Carrick. Why? He's played exciting football, I think he's got some promise, there's a connection to the club already there, and I want us to try and build something after the last couple of retread Chavs as managers.
My point on Rodgers is simply that those who claimed he's "proven" are greatly overstating his track record. His best 2 seasons in the PL were his 2nd and 3rd. It's been steady mediocrity since then, aside from the FA Cup. He ought to be managing West Ham, not Spurs.
