These aren't my ratings. I post the current averages after a day or so.Decimals on every single rating.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Performance Player Ratings: Chelsea (h) 1-4
- Thread starter Admin
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Not a reliable or accurate way of achieving a rating, highs and lows etc. It's too random and irrelevant. This thread has been confirmed as just for fun. I'm extracting the quality to try and give an alternative and perhaps broader representation as a comparison.
Every... Single... Ratings... Thread.
Every... Single... Ratings... Thread.
I mean in fairness, you did give a lot of players a 10. We did sort of lose 4-1.
I note you don't provide your own ratings....why is that ?
I gave almost all the players 10, my good man. Heroes one and all!
Every... Single... Ratings... Thread.
You make a joke of .
Very heroic and all but if Pedro Porro's performance was a 10 then I'm considering going professional.
If you play in a winning team - you're getting a 10 from me.
If you play heroically in the face of unimaginable adversity - you're getting a 10 from me.
Hope that gives you the encouragement you need to take the plunge!
and if you get sent off, you only get .50 less. !!
But by 'extracting the quality' surely you're just introducing your own bias and making the representation narrower, not broader?
I'm still not really any wiser on what constitutes a worthy/correct rating for you, but nevermind, I'll leave it at that.
Broader because I use 10 media / web ratings and 10 quality forum ratings. This gives a less biased
representation. If I included all players get 10 ratings it would be nonsense.
The forum ratings I select are not " correct " but they are generally sensible or " worthy " if you like.
It's not my bias. It's the comparison to a variety of outside opinion. I don't always agree with the consensus and critique my own ratings to highlight that.
No Maddison rating from you ?Decimals on every single rating.
Deleted member 15314
Guest
fuck off cunt
Yeh,. not worth wasting your to with this narcissistic toss-pot..... It's the same every weekend.
FWIW; you're spot on with everything you said.
I rate this post: 10.5/10
I was just prompting in case he was omitted.
am I missing something here?
The guy gives the average of polls elsewhere (I assume) and 4 people disagree????
Is he making the stuff up or do you people dislike him as a poster so much that you will just disagree with everything he posts?
seems really petty