• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Player Player Squad Registered 2025/26

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Not sure we have the budget for so many coming in without compromising on quality - remember that top forwards are expensive as is elite CM.

I think we might squeeze in 4 or 5 top players from budget this summer, getting £60m from Son/Richarlison and say £40m - £50m from Sarr/Bissouma (and buying Cordosa for £22m).

I think wages are the bigger issue.

For sale at a very conservative price we should be getting £125m for sales plus the rough £120m that our EL win plus CL football overall gets you inclusive of matches etc.


Solomon £15m
Romero £50m
Richy £30m
One of Bissouma/Bentancur £15m
Veliz £5m
Philips £5m
Gil £5m

We obviously still have the Danso £20m and maybe Tel expenditure (I imagine about £35m with Bayern)

If we want the below that is about £145m net spend (plus Tel and Danso), very doable with CL/EL success.

Delap £30m
Mbeumo £70m
Decent CM £50m
Cordosa £25m
Gomes Free
LB £20M
LCB £20M
 
I think wages are the bigger issue.

For sale at a very conservative price we should be getting £125m for sales plus the rough £120m that our EL win plus CL football overall gets you inclusive of matches etc.


Solomon £15m
Romero £50m
Richy £30m
One of Bissouma/Bentancur £15m
Veliz £5m
Philips £5m
Gil £5m

We obviously still have the Danso £20m and maybe Tel expenditure (I imagine about £35m with Bayern)

If we want the below that is about £145m net spend (plus Tel and Danso), very doable with CL/EL success.

Delap £30m
Mbeumo £70m
Decent CM £50m
Cordosa £25m
Gomes Free
LB £20M
LCB £20M
But we've just spanked the mighty Manchester United in the European Cup final, we don't need any new players.

:levyhands:
 
I think wages are the bigger issue.

For sale at a very conservative price we should be getting £125m for sales plus the rough £120m that our EL win plus CL football overall gets you inclusive of matches etc.


Solomon £15m
Romero £50m
Richy £30m
One of Bissouma/Bentancur £15m
Veliz £5m
Philips £5m
Gil £5m

We obviously still have the Danso £20m and maybe Tel expenditure (I imagine about £35m with Bayern)

If we want the below that is about £145m net spend (plus Tel and Danso), very doable with CL/EL success.

Delap £30m
Mbeumo £70m
Decent CM £50m
Cordosa £25m
Gomes Free
LB £20M
LCB £20M

I think you over estimate the EL windfall :

EL Prize money for us = € 41m (£36m)

We had 4 home games in League phase plus 4 in knock out phase so 8 Home games which with food and drink sales might be £4m or £5m per game less player bonuses and costs to stadium staff to re-open etc, so I'm guessing £30m. We'll get a share of finals gate to but no food or drink, so won't be that much.

So EL earnings more like £70m than £120m !

And by finishing 17th rather than say 7th, we'll have lost out on about £30m of PL prize money.

That's why I think we'll get say £150m - £200m this year (after includng Solomon, Gil and Hojbjerg sales but after paying Danso obligation) - as we have been spending circa £140m/£150m each summer for last couple of years. Plus of course whatever fees we get from selling off players from the squad in OP (say Romero, Bissouma, Sarr, Richarlison)

We won't be paid any cash for CL for a year, and if we only get to Last 16 before being knocked out prize money is circa £40m plus 4 or 5 home matches, so similar at £70m to EL - and we won't want to spend much of it this summer, and we will need another window next summer ! Of course if we go deep in CL next season, £ prize money goes up.
 
Here is the official EPL squad for 2024-25.

NHGHG
1VICARIO1AUSTIN
2PORRO2WHITEMAN
3UDOGIE3FORSTER
4REGUILON4SPENCE
5VDV5DAVIES
6ROMERO6DANSO
7DRAGUSIN7ROBSON
8BISSOUMA8MADDISON
9BENTANCUR9JOHNSON
10SARR10SOLANKE
11KULUSEVSKI
12WERNER
13SON
14RICHARLISON
NHG14
HG10


2025-26:
Reguilon
and Werner are definitely leaving.
Kinsky will have to be added to the NHG list as he is no longer classed as U21.
Total NHG goes from 14 to 13.
Forster
and Robson will definitely not be included, and Whiteman is also highly likely to leave.
Total HG goes from 10 to 7.

New squad total NHG 13 and HG 7 = 20.

So we can sign 4 new NHG players and 1 HG.
Or 3 NHG + 2 HG
Or 2 NHG + 3 HG
Or 1 NHG + 4 HG.
We can, in theory, sign an unlimited amount of U21 players because U21 players do not need to be included in the EPL squad.

Most signings want to play in europe, and that means less players under uefa CL rules. So I don't think that is a realistic basis to assess the squad.

And under UEFA rules, as Danso moved out of UK aged 16 or so he counts as overseas trained, and as Gray and Bergvall joined a year ago, both will need to be included in List A etc.

If you look at OP in this thread, then after 'losing' all players whose contracts do not extend beyond 30 June (including Tel) but assuming we take up Danso's obligation, there are no spare spaces in squad so we need to sell players to create squad places (and fees !).
 
Most signings want to play in europe, and that means less players under uefa CL rules. So I don't think that is a realistic basis to assess the squad.

And under UEFA rules, as Danso moved out of UK aged 16 or so he counts as overseas trained, and as Gray and Bergvall joined a year ago, both will need to be included in List A etc.

If you look at OP in this thread, then after 'losing' all players whose contracts do not extend beyond 30 June (including Tel) but assuming we take up Danso's obligation, there are no spare spaces in squad so we need to sell players to create squad places (and fees !).
I will look at the UCL squad separately later as it is a bit more complicated.
I am going out now to a Toby carvery. (I know, blatant..)
 
Worth reflecting on how much impact last summer and January transfer windows have had in squad :

Last summer we signed Solanke, Gray, Bergvall and Odobert with a rehabilitated Spence joining the squad,

Solanke - played from the beginning of the season and has been a real focal point of the attack throughout the season

Gray at age 18 - Started slowly but regularly playing at RB or CB as cover for injured players from about October onwards.

Bergvall at age 18 - Started with sub appearances and then EL appearances but by about Christmas was a regular starter, and finished as a 'preferred starter'

Odobert - Unfortunately injured really early on, so we saw him for about 2 games and then only recently has he played again.

Spence - started only really playing for us in December.

Kinsky - Signed in January and made an immediate impact replacing the injured Forster.

Austin - Unexpectedly made his GK debut aged 26 and looked a good quality 3rd GK

Danso - Excellent pickup at CB, experienced and able to slot right into Romero's place

Tel - Replaced Werner as loanee winger. Lots of potential, but no certainty !

But the key takeaway now is the squad now has the benefit at the start of next season of having :

GK - Kinsky, Austin
CB - Danso
RB/LB - Spence
CM - Bergvall, Gray
Striker - Solanke

So that's 7 players (not counting Tel who we still need to decide if we want) or 25% of the squad who are 'decent' and now signed up to the squad.

That's helped us get to a stage where we have a full squad under EL rules - and this summer we can focus on upgrading or replacing players bought in previous windows so as to improve the squad we have now.

IMO we start this window in a much stronger place than we were 12 months ago. And we aim to upgrade the squad in a few positions this window, and bring in a few of our best younsters, to get an even stronger squad to start next season with.
 
Vuskovic whilst having a lot of potential like Bergvale this season will take a few months to get up to speed. Dragusin may not be fit for the start of the season thus leaving us short in that position especially if Romero & Davies leave.
 
Vuskovic whilst having a lot of potential like Bergvale this season will take a few months to get up to speed. Dragusin may not be fit for the start of the season thus leaving us short in that position especially if Romero & Davies leave.

If Romero leaves I think we try to find best CB we can.

Dragusin we will know much better how quickly he is recovering in say 2 months compared to now and can make decisions around that info.

Agreed Vuskovic might take time to adapt - but Belgium league is higher rated than Swedish league and Vuskovic rated as best CB in that league despite him only being 17 at start of season. Vuskovic played between 2 and 3 times as much at Westerlo as Bergvall did in Sweden, and that was Vuskovic 2nd loan - so he'll arrive in preseason much more experienced than Bergvall. Spurs will be able to make a more complete judgement when in preseason as to how ready Vuskovic is.
 
Vuskovic whilst having a lot of potential like Bergvale this season will take a few months to get up to speed. Dragusin may not be fit for the start of the season thus leaving us short in that position especially if Romero & Davies leave.


Dragusin reported to have been running on grass 2 weeks ago, plus had been working in gym - that's about 12 weeks after his operation.

A very good chance of him being fit for start of season, and possibly for latter part of preseason

He's not a bad CB although not so good at distribution, so not really what Spurs need ideally. He's got a good reputation as an international CB and will certainly be attractive to other decent clubs though if we choose to sell (when he's back fit) but could also be an option as Spurs 4th choice CB
 
The Defence.
In 2024/25 we conceded 65 goals - only Wolves on 69 goals and relegated teams conceded more - circa 20 goals more than the teams in european spots via PL. And that's the reason why despite being 7th highest scorers in PL we end up in 17th spot with a GD of -1.

Individually, our defenders look quite good although due to injuries they didn't play together as much as we'd like, and I'd guess Romero and Van de Ven didn't play together in more than half the matches, we didn't have Danso until January and lost Dragusin at same time. So we've often needed to play Gray and Davies (but Davies assumed to be leaving). The Ange high line won't help defenders either.

Looking at Romero's social media it looks safer to assume he's staying after an EL winners medal and CL football next season : so that's the assumption behind this post.

CB's (4) - Romero (27), Van de Ven (24), Dragusin (23) , Danso (25)
FB's (3) - Porro (25), Udogie (22), Spence (25),

18 year old CB Luka Vuskovic has impressed everyone playing for Westerlo this last season on pretty much every measurable metric. It helps they have been playing a high line so Angeball will not be foreign to him. He's right footed but seems equally happy playing RCB or LCB, and his weaker left foot is not just for standing on. Arguably he's already too good to be loaned out again, other than to another side in PL or top league such as Bundesliga, and we'd be better using him at Spurs ..... all to be tested in pre-season of course. And whilst he has impressed a lot at Westerlo he is not the finished article and will need some further development.

If Sarr is replaced by Devine in CM (as proposed in an earlier post) we gain one extra List A/Overseas place which could be used to add Vuskovic to existing CB squad - but we also need to recruit a LB which could be the other use of that gained place.

So the options seem to be :
i) Sell Dragusin and replace him with Vuskovic. Buy a back up left back
ii) Keep both Dragusn and Vuskovic. No spare space for a left back so cover comes from Spence and Gray again
As a slight wrinkle on this option we could keep George Abbott as an extra CM too as he can also cover full back, such that we have 3 players who could potentially cover LB.

I see no great advantage in trying to upgrade on any of the other defenders this summer, and we probably don't have the budget given other priorities.

Its worth adding that both Gray and Bergvall will be classed as List B in 2026/27 which will give us 2 spare spaces, one of which could be used to acquire a dedicated left back alternative, so this may be the last season we have this issue.
 
Worth reflecting on how much impact last summer and January transfer windows have had in squad :

Last summer we signed Solanke, Gray, Bergvall and Odobert with a rehabilitated Spence joining the squad,

Solanke - played from the beginning of the season and has been a real focal point of the attack throughout the season

Gray at age 18 - Started slowly but regularly playing at RB or CB as cover for injured players from about October onwards.

Bergvall at age 18 - Started with sub appearances and then EL appearances but by about Christmas was a regular starter, and finished as a 'preferred starter'

Odobert - Unfortunately injured really early on, so we saw him for about 2 games and then only recently has he played again.

Spence - started only really playing for us in December.

Kinsky - Signed in January and made an immediate impact replacing the injured Forster.

Austin - Unexpectedly made his GK debut aged 26 and looked a good quality 3rd GK

Danso - Excellent pickup at CB, experienced and able to slot right into Romero's place

Tel - Replaced Werner as loanee winger. Lots of potential, but no certainty !

But the key takeaway now is the squad now has the benefit at the start of next season of having :

GK - Kinsky, Austin
CB - Danso
RB/LB - Spence
CM - Bergvall, Gray
Striker - Solanke

So that's 7 players (not counting Tel who we still need to decide if we want) or 25% of the squad who are 'decent' and now signed up to the squad.

That's helped us get to a stage where we have a full squad under EL rules - and this summer we can focus on upgrading or replacing players bought in previous windows so as to improve the squad we have now.

IMO we start this window in a much stronger place than we were 12 months ago. And we aim to upgrade the squad in a few positions this window, and bring in a few of our best younsters, to get an even stronger squad to start next season with.

Only Bergvall has been a success. .
Gray has been ( not his fault ) terrible
Spence faded - I think he will end up going
Solanke - is bang average and a significant reason we have played terrible football.
Odobert - played well for the first fifteen miniates
Kinksy - cost us when Vic was out ( not his fault ) Yes he made an impact but not a good one, Apart from his first game

We are deluding ourselves if we think our very recent signings have been good - on the whole they have been very bad, And as Ange says they are on him. He will never admit he made a mistakes - so I guess he will not sell them,.
 
Only Bergvall has been a success. .
Gray has been ( not his fault ) terrible
Spence faded - I think he will end up going
Solanke - is bang average and a significant reason we have played terrible football.
Odobert - played well for the first fifteen miniates
Kinksy - cost us when Vic was out ( not his fault ) Yes he made an impact but not a good one, Apart from his first game

We are deluding ourselves if we think our very recent signings have been good - on the whole they have been very bad, And as Ange says they are on him. He will never admit he made a mistakes - so I guess he will not sell them,.
IMO this is the real story with the Ange decision, not rewinding the tape to assign culpability for our league defeats.

I think Levy believes (correctly) that a new manager is going to demand a massively expensive squad overhaul and make difficult-to-sell players surplus to requirements, but Ange won't.

Literally just the individual case of Dominic Solanke weighs heavily in Levy's mind, I'll bet. Ange is dead set on Solanke leading the line, taking every penalty, keeping him at the center of the operation. Levy knows that under a new manager if he goes two games without scoring that instantly becomes an ugly albatross contract until 2030.
 
Only Bergvall has been a success. .
Gray has been ( not his fault ) terrible
Spence faded - I think he will end up going
Solanke - is bang average and a significant reason we have played terrible football.
Odobert - played well for the first fifteen miniates
Kinksy - cost us when Vic was out ( not his fault ) Yes he made an impact but not a good one, Apart from his first game

We are deluding ourselves if we think our very recent signings have been good - on the whole they have been very bad, And as Ange says they are on him. He will never admit he made a mistakes - so I guess he will not sell them,.

No manager at no club gets the option to totally change the squad.

A manager will usually discuss the squad with DoF with a view to move on the players considered to be the weakest or least fitting the squad, and try to get upgrades to them. For logistical and funding reasons that's usually maybe half a dozen players.

The aim of the process (and this thread) is to try to work out how best to end with an upgraded squad - not a perfect one.

So your posts suggesting most of Spurs players are bad and need immediate changing means either you are a Bellend or a supporter of another club intent on causing disruption to Spurs. Strangely other posters have come to the same conclusions in other threads.
 
IMO this is the real story with the Ange decision, not rewinding the tape to assign culpability for our league defeats.

I think Levy believes (correctly) that a new manager is going to demand a massively expensive squad overhaul and make difficult-to-sell players surplus to requirements, but Ange won't.

Literally just the individual case of Dominic Solanke weighs heavily in Levy's mind, I'll bet. Ange is dead set on Solanke leading the line, taking every penalty, keeping him at the center of the operation. Levy knows that under a new manager if he goes two games without scoring that instantly becomes an ugly albatross contract until 2030.

Your analysis could be right - but good critical thinking skills should mean you accept that Solanke is an underwhelming player and take it on the chin.
Otherwise you go round a rabbit hole chasing your tail. The money on Solanke is gone it should not matter if he costs £5m or £60 m - he is good enough for a top 6 PL team or not should be all that matters.
But with Levy and maybe Ange for different reasons - it will not work out liked that. And that is why it was imo such a terrible signing and one that could costs us more than most.

Because he cost so much we might persevere more than we should - eventually we will accept we need better - but not before we have lost a lot of matches. Mediocre expensive strikers can be the worst - you might be better of with a complete dud like Soldado and Jaansen - because it gets brought to a head quicker.
 
No manager at no club gets the option to totally change the squad.

A manager will usually discuss the squad with DoF with a view to move on the players considered to be the weakest or least fitting the squad, and try to get upgrades to them. For logistical and funding reasons that's usually maybe half a dozen players.

The aim of the process (and this thread) is to try to work out how best to end with an upgraded squad - not a perfect one.

So your posts suggesting most of Spurs players are bad and need immediate changing means either you are a Bellend or a supporter of another club intent on causing disruption to Spurs. Strangely other posters have come to the same conclusions in other threads.

Who said most Spurs players? " I said the recent signings look bad.
Our defense is looking ok - midfield is close - attack way short.
 
The squad that started last season had 5 players that were not ready or good enough which became clear as they only played if no other option. Regulion, Werner, Spence, Bergvale & Gray. Now the first 2 will go & the other 3 have now proved themselves. Davies & forester also leaving. We must not start next season in a similar position and as Spursidol says we need to have some of the youngsters currently on loan that qualify for B list to bolster the squad.

We still have shortages in some departments being DM, reliable Goalscorer & another creative player. Who leaves to create these spaces is debateable but Biss & Richie are 2 prime candidates.
Where do we play Gray? whilst he prefers midfield I have yet to see evidence he is good enough yet for that position and he has performed at RB better. Thus with Spence covering LB we can concentrate on getting players in elsewhere.
Do we sign Tel? I have seen no evidence he is better than Odebert or in fact Soloman and not good enough to be Solanke's deputy if Richie leaves.
 
The Defence.
In 2024/25 we conceded 65 goals - only Wolves on 69 goals and relegated teams conceded more - circa 20 goals more than the teams in european spots via PL. And that's the reason why despite being 7th highest scorers in PL we end up in 17th spot with a GD of -1.

Individually, our defenders look quite good although due to injuries they didn't play together as much as we'd like, and I'd guess Romero and Van de Ven didn't play together in more than half the matches, we didn't have Danso until January and lost Dragusin at same time. So we've often needed to play Gray and Davies (but Davies assumed to be leaving). The Ange high line won't help defenders either.

Looking at Romero's social media it looks safer to assume he's staying after an EL winners medal and CL football next season : so that's the assumption behind this post.

CB's (4) - Romero (27), Van de Ven (24), Dragusin (23) , Danso (25)
FB's (3) - Porro (25), Udogie (22), Spence (25),

18 year old CB Luka Vuskovic has impressed everyone playing for Westerlo this last season on pretty much every measurable metric. It helps they have been playing a high line so Angeball will not be foreign to him. He's right footed but seems equally happy playing RCB or LCB, and his weaker left foot is not just for standing on. Arguably he's already too good to be loaned out again, other than to another side in PL or top league such as Bundesliga, and we'd be better using him at Spurs ..... all to be tested in pre-season of course. And whilst he has impressed a lot at Westerlo he is not the finished article and will need some further development.

If Sarr is replaced by Devine in CM (as proposed in an earlier post) we gain one extra List A/Overseas place which could be used to add Vuskovic to existing CB squad - but we also need to recruit a LB which could be the other use of that gained place.

So the options seem to be :
i) Sell Dragusin and replace him with Vuskovic. Buy a back up left back
ii) Keep both Dragusn and Vuskovic. No spare space for a left back so cover comes from Spence and Gray again
As a slight wrinkle on this option we could keep George Abbott as an extra CM too as he can also cover full back, such that we have 3 players who could potentially cover LB.

I see no great advantage in trying to upgrade on any of the other defenders this summer, and we probably don't have the budget given other priorities.

Its worth adding that both Gray and Bergvall will be classed as List B in 2026/27 which will give us 2 spare spaces, one of which could be used to acquire a dedicated left back alternative, so this may be the last season we have this issue.
I disagree with the Romero assumption. Publicly stated he wants to play in La liga. It’s a World Cup next summer. The chance to retain it, prev only Brazil have done it. As we know to our cost, his priority is, and always has been, Argentina. Yes he was good in the Europa but that was a means to an end. He has done his bit but overall we wouldn’t miss him because he’s never here. Average 20 games a season, get around 60m for him and goodbye.
 
Back
Top