I just don't understand how Greenwood and Mendy were named and shamed and then either found not guilty or charges were dropped, whatever you might feel about that, yet the situation in Partey's case are so different.
Both of the former two were dropped by their teams, both have had their careers more or less ruined, again, rightly or wrongly. Yet Thomas Partey continues to play week in, week out unless injured.
Back in another life when I worked out of the Old Bailey press room, the justification for not naming a rape suspect was where it could identify the victim, whose right to secrecy is sacrosanct. So you could name all the others, photograph them (my job) but not publish the pics until found guilty. We would sit on the pics, keep them on file, ready to release in case of a guilty verdict. If not guilty, it was the end of the line (well, they were kept on file, my idiot boss believed that absolutely everyone in court was guilty and "they're bound to do it again mate". He was right occasionally, to be fair).
It seemed like a reasonable compromise at the time. Yet Mendy and Greenwood were often seen in the papers and online going to/leaving court, which I didn't really understand. And it sure as hell doesn't explain how Partey has been allowed remain anonymous throughout, when that right isn't extended to anyone else.