• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Management Relegation

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Do you think we'll stay up?

  • Yes

    Votes: 184 40.1%
  • No

    Votes: 275 59.9%

  • Total voters
    459
Status
Not open for further replies.
10 pts would put us on 39.

The last time 39 points got a club relegated was 2010/11. It’s basically a race to 35 in the “strongest” of years at the bottom. Many years even 30 can get you across the line.

But to your point, I can’t even find a fucking point in our remaining fixtures.
I told everyone I went game by game with the players availbe currently and could plausibly find one point. Thats why I'll be shocked if we stay up.
 
West Ham can score goals.

This Spurs team do not score goals or create enough chances to win games.

When Spurs do score enough goals to win a game the undropable goalkeeper makes an 'error' to let the opposition win anyway.
We've scored more than West ham and they concede at a significantly higher rate than us.

Again, I’m not trying to paper over our cracks but this whole idea that West Ham are some super team that’s going to run through their remaining fixtures is completely off base.

We’re all understandably fucked off with the form we’re in but West Ham’s reality is much different than what’s being proposed here.
 
Players have normalised low standards within themselves.

Not even Igor can change their mentality fast enough, but the players can blame only themselves if they cannot beat the likes of Palace, Forest, Wolves, Leeds and Everton.
 
We've scored more than West ham and they concede at a significantly higher rate than us.

Again, I’m not trying to paper over our cracks but this whole idea that West Ham are some super team that’s going to run through their remaining fixtures is completely off base.

We’re all understandably fucked off with the form we’re in but West Ham’s reality is much different than what’s being proposed here.

West Ham have got the tools and the experience to get out of this.

Spurs are a fucking shambles.

Once West Ham go ahead of Spurs; we will not catch them.

It's Spurs or Forest.
 
This was one of 5-6 games somewhat winnable left, and we got zero out of it.

We have the worst form over the last 10 in the league.

Our coach is playing strange formations and seems to think Gray can play LB better than Porro.

We are fucked.
Playing one player out of position is better than two.

It would be better to play Souza at LB than shoehorn someone else in.
 
Playing one player out of position is better than two.

It would be better to play Souza at LB than shoehorn someone else in.

I think Porro being the natural fullback should be switching to the other side. Gray is a more natural RB. But with no width this formation is simply not going to work. A diamond CM with inverted fullbacks and warming up as a back three as some kind of feint? I just don't see how that is a viable formation in this Premiership.
 
We are the worst side in the league at the moment, I’m not disputing that.

West Ham also lost to Forest and Wolves back to back not that long ago. They’re in the bottom 3 for a reason. I think it’s more likely they revert back to shit than it is they just push on and pick up points at European calibre level.

Problem is, them reverting back could still relegate us with the way we’re playing.
I don't see where a solitary point comes for us though. It's very, very bad.
 
I think Porro being the natural fullback should be switching to the other side. Gray is a more natural RB. But with no width this formation is simply not going to work. A diamond CM with inverted fullbacks and warming up as a back three as some kind of feint? I just don't see how that is a viable formation in this Premiership.

Playing Porro on the left would be utterly pointless. His right foot is the only creative weapon we have and it would be completely nullified if he were on the left.
 
I think Porro being the natural fullback should be switching to the other side. Gray is a more natural RB. But with no width this formation is simply not going to work. A diamond CM with inverted fullbacks and warming up as a back three as some kind of feint? I just don't see how that is a viable formation in this Premiership.
Playing Porro on the left with anyone else at RB that isn’t a RB unbalances both positions.

It makes no fucking sense.

Playing Porro left and Spence right, I’d give you. But when the only available player for that position is for, you play him where he’s best suited.
 
Playing Porro on the left would be utterly pointless. His right foot is the only creative weapon we have and it would be completely nullified if he were on the left.

Your opinion. He could still be massively useful curling inswingers into the box from the left. It's not like he even gets to the endline anyways. Inswingers are probably more useful anyways since the keeper is catching most of his right-to-left curling strays that curl too late and too close to the keeper.
 
Your opinion. He could still be massively useful curling inswingers into the box from the left. It's not like he even gets to the endline anyways. Inswingers are probably more useful anyways since the keeper is catching most of his right-to-left curling strays that curl too late and too close to the keeper.
Players being inverted is a fucking sin in the current era.

And nobody gets in the box early to benefit from crosses.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top