• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Management So (hypothetically) who replaces Ange then?

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Who to replace Ange?

  • Andoni Iraola

    Votes: 157 44.7%
  • Edin Terzic

    Votes: 23 6.6%
  • Graham Potter

    Votes: 24 6.8%
  • Thomas Frank

    Votes: 28 8.0%
  • Marco Silva

    Votes: 23 6.6%
  • Kieran McKenna

    Votes: 10 2.8%
  • Ryan Mason (Full Time)

    Votes: 10 2.8%
  • Michel

    Votes: 2 0.6%
  • Xavi

    Votes: 22 6.3%
  • Mauricio Pochettino

    Votes: 36 10.3%
  • Dino Toppmoller

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Simone Inzaghi

    Votes: 1 0.3%
  • Sean Dyche (Click here if you're an idiot)

    Votes: 3 0.9%
  • No-one (Ange new contract)

    Votes: 2 0.6%
  • Oliver Glasner

    Votes: 10 2.8%
  • Vincenzo Italiano

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Vitor Pereira

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    351

View: https://x.com/LastWordOnSpurs/status/1909916897119715459

Anyone in Germany know if Bild is a decent source?

If it's a serious link, might flip flop my vote to Glasner


He thinks Klopp is a cunt?

I'm all in. Vote changed.
images
 
My question with Glasner is formational. Going back to 3 CBs may require significant investment in that position again.

If we keep Romero, we currently have 4. Bring Ashley Phillips back next season and that would be 5. Is that really enough? Is Danso good enough as the primary backup? Is Dragusin-Romero-VDV good enough as a starting trio?

Formations and tactics are why Iraola is still my preference. The AVB->Pochettino symmetry, bringing in someone who does things similar to what we do now, but better and more competently.
I’d argue that our squad is suited to 3 CBs and wing backs. Romero (Dragusin) RCB, Danso (Gray) CB, VdV (Davies) LCB, Spence, Udogie and Porro WBs. Solanke (TBD) CF, Son (Tel, Johnson) 2nd striker, Kulu / Maddison / Odobert ACM, Bergvall (Sarr) #8, Maybe Glasner can bring Wharton to compete at #6 with Gray, and Guehi to replace Dragusin.
 
My question with Glasner is formational. Going back to 3 CBs may require significant investment in that position again.

If we keep Romero, we currently have 4. Bring Ashley Phillips back next season and that would be 5. Is that really enough? Is Danso good enough as the primary backup? Is Dragusin-Romero-VDV good enough as a starting trio?

Formations and tactics are why Iraola is still my preference. The AVB->Pochettino symmetry, bringing in someone who does things similar to what we do now, but better and more competently.
I would actually argue we’d be well set up for that (Altho it’s not a formation I personally like):

Going into next season we could have a back 3 of Romero - Dragusin - VDV
With a combo of Danso, Vuskovic, Phillips and Davies as back up.

Wing back wise would argue our 3 fullbacks are well suited for the role.
 

Troy Deeney urges Tottenham to replace Ange Postecoglou with Marco Silva​

The manager in question is Marco Silva, who has been going from strength to strength at Fulham over the past few years.

Tottenham have added Silva to their list of managerial targets in wake of his efforts in turning the West London club into a stable Premier League outfit.

Deeney, who Silva managed in his time at Watford, has claimed that his former manager is ‘more than ready’ to take the job on.

Indeed, Deeney believes that Silva would be able to turn Spurs’ fortunes around in a matter of months.

“Marco is more than ready,” Deeney said on talkSPORT.

“The biggest compliment you could take for Marco Silva is that, if you look at all the people that are around him – his staff – they’ve been poached, because they (other clubs) want Marco Silva, but they go and get the people off his branches.
“He’s ready for a big team. I think he’d be perfect for Spurs if they would allow him to just go and take over and not get involved too much from up above.

“I think he’d change the culture of that place within three months. Marco is definitely ready. Fulham are on a good trajectory but I think they’ll struggle to keep him long term.”

What Troy Deeney said about Marco Silva’s ruthlessness​

Last year, Deeney named Silva as the scariest manager he has ever worked with – more so than Sean Dyche.

Deeney, speaking to the Football First podcast on BBC Sounds, revealed how up front Silva was about how “slow” he was as a player.

“Sean Dyche would have to be up there, but do you know who was, but it was more for his ruthlessness? Marco Silva,” said Deeney.

“Small in stature, a nice guy but he’ll cut you off. It’s his way or no way.

“When he came in at Watford, and bear in mind I was doing alright, he wanted more pace up front which is fine.

“He signed Andre Gray, and he said to me: ‘You’re a legend, I don’t want to be disrespectful, but you’re slow.’ And I was like: ‘OK, I can’t do anything about that.’

“He said: ‘You’re a nice guy but you’re just too slow’ and just walked off. It was just ‘this is why he’s in, deal with it’. He was just straight.

“I’ve got a great relationship with him now and I’ve been into Fulham to see him but we’ve never really spoken about it actually.”
 
I would actually argue we’d be well set up for that (Altho it’s not a formation I personally like):

Going into next season we could have a back 3 of Romero - Dragusin - VDV
With a combo of Danso, Vuskovic, Phillips and Davies as back up.

Wing back wise would argue our 3 fullbacks are well suited for the role.

Surely Danso would be ahead of Dragusin in the starting XI. I had not considered Vuskovic, but if we move to 3 CBs I think he'll end up starting a few games and/or coming off the bench.

If no mid-week football next season ...

GK: Vicario [Kinsky]
RCB: Romero [Gray]
CB: Danso [Vuskovic]
LCB: VdV [Davies]
RWB: Porro [Spence]
LWB: Spence [Udogie]
DCM: Gray [TBD]
#8: Bergvall [Sarr]
#10: Kulusevski [Maddison / Odobert / Moore]
ST: Son [Johnson]
CF: Solanke [TBD]

Sell/Release: Forster. Dragusin, Bissouma, Bentancur, Werner, Richarlison

Would need to buy another CB (Guehi?), a specialist DCM (Wharton or Cardosa ?) and a CF (Delap?).

1
Vicario
2
Romero
3
Danso
4
VdV
5
Porro
6
Bergvall
7
Gray
8
Spence
9
Kulusevski
10
Solanke
11
Son
lineup code
[lineup]
Vicario
Romero Danso VdV
Porro Bergvall Gray Spence
Kulusevski
Solanke Son
[/lineup]
 
Surely Danso would be ahead of Dragusin in the starting XI. I had not considered Vuskovic, but if we move to 3 CBs I think he'll end up starting a few games and/or coming off the bench.

If no mid-week football next season ...

GK: Vicario [Kinsky]
RCB: Romero [Gray]
CB: Danso [Vuskovic]
LCB: VdV [Davies]
RWB: Porro [Spence]
LWB: Spence [Udogie]
DCM: Gray [TBD]
#8: Bergvall [Sarr]
#10: Kulusevski [Maddison / Odobert / Moore]
ST: Son [Johnson]
CF: Solanke [TBD]

Sell/Release: Forster. Dragusin, Bissouma, Bentancur, Werner, Richarlison

Would need to buy another CB (Guehi?), a specialist DCM (Wharton or Cardosa ?) and a CF (Delap?).

1
Vicario
2
Romero
3
Danso
4
VdV
5
Porro
6
Bergvall
7
Gray
8
Spence
9
Kulusevski
10
Solanke
11
Son
lineup code
[lineup]
Vicario
Romero Danso VdV
Porro Bergvall Gray Spence
Kulusevski
Solanke Son
[/lineup]

Reckon Glasner would be like this

1
Vicario
2
Danso
3
Romero
4
VDV
5
Spence
6
Bergvall
7
Gray
8
Udogie
9
Kulusevski
10
Solanke
11
Maddison
lineup code
[lineup]
Vicario
Danso Romero VDV
Spence Bergvall Gray Udogie
Kulusevski Solanke Maddison
[/lineup]


Son would move on and Odobert would play absolutely shed loads in that L10 where Maddison is. If we were playing bigger teams who could pin our wing backs in, Johnson would play in the R10 and use pace to get in behind.

But we would still need to sign more CBs. Davies can't play PL anymore, Vuskovic and Phillips are young so you 6 man rotation would be: Danso Romero VDV Dragusin Vuskovic Phillips (new). If we kept Romero which is far from certain.
 
just not a fan of a back 3 at all, seems to just breed negativity in the team when up against a half decent side most of the time, very few top teams use it
Me too.

It's the 3 up front that I really question. Especially under Ange's tactics. When Maddison or Kulu play, as one of the three in midfield, the other two midfield players get overrun in and out of possession. This cuts off the supply to the forwards leaving them isolated and puts the defence under constant pressure which they eventually yield to.

I suspect that many of the senior players have checked out as a result of this.

I'd bin off the inverted full backs and let them provide the width, play a 4 man diamond midfield, with a reverse sweeper in front of the back 4, (Bentancur), two runners in midfield,(Bergvall and Sarr), with either Maddison or Kulu behind Solanke and one other from Son or Brennan.

Ange and his roaming centre backs and full backs can fuck off.
 
just not a fan of a back 3 at all, seems to just breed negativity in the team when up against a half decent side most of the time, very few top teams use it
Even Conte abandoned it this season i believe. Can think only about Inter. To make it work they play this system already for like 6 or 7 years? And their recruitment is top level. But still, its defence first for them when playing against better opponents (11:1 in terms of goals scored/conceded in CL league phase). So your concerns are very valid
 
Back
Top