GLC yes, Gil not even closeWe're you watching the same game?
Arguabley Gil and Lo Celso were our best players?
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
GLC yes, Gil not even closeWe're you watching the same game?
Arguabley Gil and Lo Celso were our best players?
Their fans are worse. Arrogant far beyond their rank in world football.Fucking outrageous from a team that has won fuck all and is just enjoying a purple patch.
They'll be shite once again before you know it.
I honestly thought Villa had more class.
Gil was rarely a threat of any consequence and his crosses were either wayward or over hit. Gil actually managed to make Kulusevski look reasonable.Neither I think had started this season. Both contributed significantly to our press until they both ran out of steam.
Lo Celso scored.
Gill constantly provided a threat down the left and covered well for Udogie when he ended up out of position. Should have scored.
Who do you reckon had better games? Porro , Kulusevski maybe?
No, I needed the manager to admit he got it wrong....which he did.Did you need a press conference to be spoon fed that?
The line up was pretty clear.
What did he admit to getting wrong?No, I needed the manager to admit he got it wrong....which he did.
View: https://x.com/collinabanter/status/1728811665595204024?s=46&t=DK3x3JffKkqwqcsQdIeO_A
VAR official is legit not allowed to ref Liverpool games because he’s compromised?
Fucking hell.... That's a recipe for a broken jaw.
Not quite as bad as the un-punnished Antonio one on Reg a couple of season's ago. That was pure violence.
Weird one the elbow. I think the law is written specifically that a red card can only be given if the elbow is thrown with intent/as a ‘weapon’. Not sure you can prove that at all here.
But it should be a penalty imo.
If the law is written that way it's very much open to subjective opinion.
If I say I think it is, and you say you don't think it is, how do we resolve that?
The law is never going to be perfect. Goes for football law and genuine, important law. You can’t give reds automatically for it or you’d end up with a situation similar to that ridiculous handball rule we had for a bit.
You have to rely on the referees decision. Here I think he got it right and wrong - don’t think you can conclusively say red, but that kind of incident should still be deemed clumsy and penalty worthy.
By the laws of the game it's violent conduct, as he made no effort to play the ball, he was playing the man.Weird one the elbow. I think the law is written specifically that a red card can only be given if the elbow is thrown with intent/as a ‘weapon’. Not sure you can prove that at all here.
But it should be a penalty imo.
The Foest lad?
By the laws of the game it's violent conduct, as he made no effort to play the ball, he was playing the man.
Straight Red and a penalty all day long.
Fair enough, didn't know it was fancy dressIt's someone in 'fancy dress'. Yes I posted it for a laugh.
You're not me, and I'm not deleting it.
By the laws of the game it's violent conduct, as he made no effort to play the ball, he was playing the man.
Straight Red and a penalty all day long.