The silliest bit of all, though, is the closing intention to explore ‘the range of options available’. Firstly because those options comprise entirely of a) cry and b) cry more, both of which have now been quite fully explored, but also because the necessary vagueness created by the total lack of actual options means Liverpool leave themselves open to attacks on things they’ve not even asked for.
www.football365.com


Sympathy for Liverpool is huge but not limitless - their 'sporting integrity' statement is absurd
Do Liverpool *really* want to set football down a path where officiating errors 'undermine sporting integrity' and require a 'range of options' be explored?

