I think just give a Fonz thumbs up and a Hey with a big smile , will drive them nuts
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Match Spurs Vs Liverpool - Saturday 30th 17:30
- Thread starter Fattynomates
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
That was Curtis Jones
Saying the second yellow wasn't correct. That was clear as day. What am I missing?
you are right the fun is never ending , because they will never stop crying
Posted this in another thread
Klopp can’t get no satisfaction
Klopp can’t get no satisfaction
cos he tries and he tries and he tries and he’ll try
Klopp can’t get no , Klopp can’t get no
When Klopps driving in his car
And a scouse man steals his radials
And he can’t afford four more
He has zero information
There’s no interest at the police station
He can’t can’t get no , oh no no no hey hey hey
Points snatched away
Oh yeah, thanks!
If anything was wrong it was the first yellow.
Could’ve sworn he lunged in for the second?
Exactly
I'm starting to get a bad feeling about it all. Just fabricating new "evidence" to pile on the narrative that Scum 2.0 were unfairly treated. Replay incoming. At this point I don't really care, I'm ready to smash them in a replay even though we've got all to lose in that instance. They'll also make some shit up so we'll have to play without a crowd even though we didn't do anything wrong here
Cant appeal for two yellows
However, the panel then went on to say that he deserved a Red for kicking Skipp in the head the previous season though, so the dirty little nugget can fucking do one!
Don't worry. There is no mechanism for this to be replayed. It is just an incorrect offside call.
Interestingly I heard Talksport talking about a "sports" lawyer saying it was possible under the PL rules. I addressed this as soon as Liverpool released their statement as I saw what they doing. Well, that lawyer identified the correct rule (a game can be replayed) but failed to understand under what circumstances, which is only for a breach of a PL rule by a club, not an official. In addition no PL rule was actually broken.
I spend most of time in financial compliance as a lawyer dealing with highly complex cross border rules, I was a bit shocked by that lawyer's comments as he only had to read a few rules to understand it properly and me, not being a sports lawyer, understood it better in 10 minutes
I wonder if the majority of those on that panel were made up of Liverpool fans 
Jota was lucky to have gotten away with a yellow card incident before he got his 1st yellow and still kept on as if nothing had happened. He really deserved 2 yellow.
www.espn.co.uk
Jota was lucky to have gotten away with a yellow card incident before he got his 1st yellow and still kept on as if nothing had happened. He really deserved 2 yellow.
Jota red card at Spurs was incorrect, panel says
The Premier League's Independent Key Match Incidents Panel has ruled Diogo Jota should not have been sent off in Liverpool's controversial 2-1 defeat at Tottenham.
Panel says Jota red card for Liverpool at Spurs was incorrect
Ah, but a Premier League rule was broken...the one which says Liverpool simply have to beat teams like Spurs
For the last fucking time.
There is NOT going to be a fucking replay.
Christ.
So they don't think the 2nd yellow was a yellow?I wonder if the majority of those on that panel were made up of Liverpool fans
Jota red card at Spurs was incorrect, panel says
The Premier League's Independent Key Match Incidents Panel has ruled Diogo Jota should not have been sent off in Liverpool's controversial 2-1 defeat at Tottenham.
Panel says Jota red card for Liverpool at Spurs was incorrect
Preposterous! That means lacking common sense, or absurd for any scousers reading... wait they can't read... moving on.
If the argument is that the first yellow shouldn't have been a yellow, maybe the foul he committed right before being shown the first yellow should have been yellow.instead of letting it get to where one was shown for what looks like minimal contact.
Last edited:
You're missing that this is likely due to a unceasing, multi-day temper tantrum by professional victims, and they're feeling the pressure to respond. It was as clear as day that it was a second yellow.
Edit:
Fucking LOL that's not a yellow.
View: https://youtu.be/Ez0M1U8PZXo?si=xo7dlihJvjUoypLs&t=10