• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers Summer 2016 Transfer Window Thread

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Would anyone be surprised if we brought nobody else in and subject to loans paying out we break even on net spend (again) levy has even said the stadium won't affect player transfers so really it won't be a shock if we do the same as every other season
 
Bri said:
Would anyone be surprised if we brought nobody else in and subject to loans paying out we break even on net spend (again) levy has even said the stadium won't affect player transfers so really it won't be a shock if we do the same as every other season
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I would be. I'm pretty confident that we have a couple lined up. I can't see us letting players go if not.
 
Bri said:
Would anyone be surprised if we brought nobody else in and subject to loans paying out we break even on net spend (again) levy has even said the stadium won't affect player transfers so really it won't be a shock if we do the same as every other season
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Why would that be an issue?

Even as Poch has said, it's difficult to improve our starting XI, so any additional players are likely to be backups, prospects, or other options.

Those kinds of players aren't marquee signings.

As a result, the one in one out makes sense, so maybe we are considering selling a Son to bring in a marquee player. If we ended up breaking even, that's a good thing - why should it be a measure of failure (like it is implied)?
 
CJJ said:
Why would that be an issue?

Even as Poch has said, it's difficult to improve our starting XI, so any additional players are likely to be backups, prospects, or other options.

Those kinds of players aren't marquee signings.

As a result, the one in one out makes sense, so maybe we are considering selling a Son to bring in a marquee player. If we ended up breaking even, that's a good thing - why should it be a measure of failure (like it is implied)?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
People love pointing the finger though...must make them feel superior or something...
 
CJJ said:
Why would that be an issue?

Even as Poch has said, it's difficult to improve our starting XI, so any additional players are likely to be backups, prospects, or other options.

Those kinds of players aren't marquee signings.

As a result, the one in one out makes sense, so maybe we are considering selling a Son to bring in a marquee player. If we ended up breaking even, that's a good thing - why should it be a measure of failure (like it is implied)?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Where did I imply or state this is an issue?? I just asked a question based on our recent history, stop reading between the lines (there's nothing there)
 
I don't think it will happen, but I don't mind if zaha signs. He's a pacy impact player who could definitely be useful if we're chasing a game or not breaking a side down. He certainly fucked us up last year.
I've not exactly been blown away by any off the names mentioned this window, and we've signed what we really needed in a dm/st. The form of our key players is what matters.
Fucking 500 pages
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top