-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Transfers Summer 2020 Transfer Thread
- Thread starter The Fighting Cock
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Actually, indifferent would be more accurate. I see him for what he is.
You, on the other hand
Last edited:
Hadn't thought of that. It would spare us an elongated Levy negotiation eventually getting hijacked by Chelsea in the home stretch.
Yeah, only quote part of the post and have no awareness of context.Actually, indifferent would be more accurate. I see him for what he is.
You, on the other hand
What a tit you really are.
Too pricey for us. But not too pricey for our rivals?
See what I mean guys
Too pricey for us. But not too pricey for our rivals?
See what I mean guys
Lets see which of our rivals buy him ?
Liverpool couldn't even pay Werner's 52m buy out.
Of course. We can only buy players from Bournmouth if they get relegated.
So too expensive for everyone then? My apologies. Your post gave the impression it was only us being hit by the financial impact this window.
:dierpochhug:
No problem for the Chavs to stump up for Werner, despite a £97 million loss in their most recent financial statements and an owner who’s had his visa revoked and has been kicked out of the UK. Nothing to look at here though. It’s all Financial Fair Play compliant.
Chelsea will have to "comply" with FFP same as anyone and they don't have any inflated related sponsorship either.
Couple of things might help them though, they sold Hazard and were banned from buying anyone for a season. Now clubs are also getting some kind of free hit in this years FFP accounting too I think. Bare in mind that FFP examines accounts on a rolling 3 years basis, so Chelsea have effectively got a two year freebee maybe kind of......
And Abramovich.
King > Wilson
He is HG too btw.
He is HG too btw.
We won the competition in signing him against PSG. Which makes me very excited at the time.
But when he turns out to be a disappointment for us, i did watch his 31 goals clip again and found out none of his goals are impressive. Almost exclusively a poacher goals without any eloquent technique behind it. Which i completely missed on the first sitting. Its all about context and how you presumed stuff before digesting any content isnt it.
That's around what we should be paying for a quality back-up #9. I believe Llorente was on around £75-100/wk (I've seen various figures) for us.Bournemouth are apparently paying him 110k a week.
If he has a relegation clause that says he can leave for 10 mill you just know our leader will offer 7 mill
Bournemouth are apparently paying him 110k a week.
Llorente was on about the same. I think there would be a lot of clubs in for him at that price so we’d have to pay that level of wage to get him, which I agree is a negative.
It seems like a no brainer to me. He had a poor season like everyone else at Bournemouth, but maybe was effected by not getting his big move last summer (when Chelsea wanted him).
If his knees aren’t completely shot and that is the reason for his tail off in form he ticks a lot of boxes for us. We could send them Parrott on loan as a sweetener too perhaps?