Yeah me too, they're good shouts. Olise in particular can definately go up another couple of levels.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Transfers Summer 2022 Transfer Thread.
- Thread starter Darnswim 🇦🇱
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Why would you leave Southampton for Everton. Do you realise what a mess Everton are inIf indeed Spurs have a buy-back option of £30m and other EPL are willing to pay £40m (which I doubt very strongly) maybe Spurs should simply trigger that buy-back clause and sell him for a £10m profit
Southampton 'value Walker-Peters at £40million' amid Everton interest
Frank Lampard's Everton are said to be leading the race for the England international's signature after his contract negotiations with the Saints came to a stand-still.www.dailymail.co.uk
Southampton 'place £40million price-tag on Kyle Walker-Peters' to fend off interest from Frank Lampard's Everton... as Saints' contract talks with the England international stall
By JAMES COHEN FOR MAILONLINE
- Southampton have placed a £40million price-tag on Kyle Walker-Peters
- The England international is a transfer target for multiple Premier league clubs
- Everton are hoping to make the full-back their second recruit of the summer
- Woolwich and Manchester United have also been monitoring his Saints situation
PUBLISHED: 12:37 BST, 17 July 2022 | UPDATED: 13:51 BST, 17 July 2022
I'd guess Palace would slap at least a 40m "steer clear" on either.... At which point surely the fundamental consideration goes back to the player/ability.
Let’s try and do a deal offer winks to southampton and negotiate a deal for ward prowse
If there was a sell on clause, might be easier just to benefit from that instead.
No, let's not.
Apart from FKs (which is not basis alone to call anyone a good player!); JWP offers us nothing we don't already have........
And we have Kane on free kick, so no point in bring in a free kick taker
And we have Kane on free kick, so no point in bring in a free kick taker
Unfortunately for JWP; FK-taker isn't a position in itself... This is not American Football where you just bring on a kicker for special occasions.
Why not ? Is richarlison a spurs player? Before we were inter tested in him he was probably one of the most despised players amongst fans. A big time cheat. Now his a spurs player. £50M for Maddison HG as well and is just the sort of attacking player we need for bus Parker teams.
He's a decent player but I think he's found his level. He's the type that Newcastle would go for now.
A fair few people wanted him before the window opened.
How has he fared against parked buses in the past then?
If at all, I dare say most people only tend to watch Lester when they're playing the bigger teams.
..........Perhaps all his Gs & As have come against teams that leave a little more space for him to operate?
Also if we want to play 3-5-2 he would be pretty much needed.
Well we are not exactly blessed in that department? We have struggled last season Burnley twice, Brighton at home, Brentford away to name a few all games where you would expect us to boss the game and create chances but we hardly mustered a shot. So why not bring in Maddison to offer one-twos, quick little slide rule passes plus free kicks. Unless you have someone else in mind?
I think both Eze and Olise would fit Conte’s system better and are more versatile - they can both play right, left or centre AM and as WRF/WLF - Eze can play as an 8 - they can both move with the ball and beat players too - unlike Maddison.
I think Eze would cost 30-35. Olise maybe 35-40 plus adds.
Olise’s xa90 was almost double Maddisons’s. Of players who played more than 1000 minutes, his 0.40 xa90 was only bettered by KDB.
Also Maddison is a massive wankhorn.
I'm not advocating for Madison here..... Just thinking in terms of bang for our buck.
This matter keeps coming back to the question mark of IF Conte wants to move away from 343.... If not, then we may as well just invest in the front 3 instead.
If Madison is not productive against parked buses then this whole speech is moot.
Is he? I don't know, but I'm not the one advocating that we sign him. You've not really sought to answer my point at all......
A Terrible of Ivans?What's the true plural collective?
A team of Perisi?
A gaggle of Perisi's?
I’m not saying we buy him either all
Im saying he is the sort of player we need. If plan A doesn’t work or we need to change formation depending on the opposition then a Maddison type player would be useful. Hence I was all for ericksen to come back for a couple years whilst we find a younger version or develop one.