• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers Summer 2026 Transfer Thread

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Im here thinking that... if we sign Savinho, we will have two pacey wingers that will keep the play wide.
But neither of them is super clinical or accurate passer/crosser.

At the same time we have technically good AM's that lack that kind of burst of pace.
So once our AM's are back in action, could we play something along the lines of:

----------------Kinsky-------------
-Porro---van Hecke-Van de Ven-Robertson
-----------------New CM--------------
-------Kulusevski-------Maddison--
Kudus--------------------------Savinho
---------------Solanke-----------------

Or well... until Kulu and Xavi will be out, it could be

----------------Kinsky-------------
-Porro---van Hecke-Van de Ven-Robertson
-----------------New CM--------------
-------Gallagher-------Maddison--
Kudus--------------------------Savinho
---------------Solanke-----------------

What I am thinking here is that in some games, instead of double-pivot CM we could use one dominant CM and than two more attacking midfielders. Players who would essentially follow either Savinho/Kudus run and provide them a cut-back option slightly infield. Either to draw defenders out or in some case just play quick sequence of maybe receiving-and-returning?

That would help with the delivery problems. BUT would leave midfield quite exposed, I do admit. But just an idea.

At this point, I feel that expecting either Kudus or Savinho to pick up the ball and then make a solo-run culminating in either scoring or assisting goal themselves might be... well... tad unrealistic expectation.

Its very difficult to predict a manager like di zerbi. His football is both genius and madness in many ways and unlike Frank, ange or any other managers it can take shape in many different ways.
He has played a 433 which switches into a 3151 in possession, he also likes the offset box in midfield (2x 10's) which would suit us nicely with maddison and xavi fit. He always tends to like a dribbly winger pinned high and wide with an intelligent CF who knows when to drop in and link or decoy for runners in behind.

He really is cutting edge and nobody can predict what route he will go down or this team he has in his dream is.

I really like the idea of a back 3 of Senesi, VDV and hecke in possession. We would absolutely dominate the ball with those 3 and allow porro to push up and rw to tuck in.

Pre-season is going to be great to watch and see how it progresses.
 
Did that begin when we paid 60m for Richy?
In terms of paying top four money for relegation fodder technical ability with minimal potential upside and a negative effect on the football we'd be capable of playing, where there was just no world in which the player could justify the fee, yeah, that was the start of it.

In Richy's case at least, he was so critical to Everton and they were so financially desperate that it made some sense that they'd only let him go for an overpay.

City would be flogging off Savinho for half the quoted price this summer if we weren't being such an absolute sucker about this. It has to be the worst deal in club history by that metric.
 
I've been reading the discussion here on the potential prices. And one thing really surprised/annoyed me.

People there tend to suggest that "oh, that is just inflation. You do not get much of a player for 60 mil these days!".
And it is one more line that is 100% factually wrong, even if it is repeated 10 000 times here. Just pile of shit. Lazy (or no) thinking. Clearly untrue.

In whole of EPL history there have been 61 (!) deals... across all of the teams across all the years where the transfer fee has exceeded 60 million. Also season by season number of such deals has been -
25/26 - 15
24/25 - 3
23/24 - 10
22/23 - 8
21/22 - 3
And in total 22 times before that.
From these 61 how many have been made by other teams than oil clubs (Shitty, Chelscum) + Woolwich, Pool and Manu?
Well exactly 8 times. And that number is evenly split between Newcastle (Isak, Woltemade, Elanga, Tonali) and ourselves (Xavi, Solanke, Kudus, Ndombele). From these 8 only Isak and Woltemade were significantly over 60 mil (both ~75) others were either 65 or below.

So transfer outlay of 60 million euro is an exceptionally high amount. And it is black and white fact. Despite what people "feel".

And what considers Savinho individually - well he did arrive to much fanfare from related club Girona. His reported transfer value was 25 mil EUR which was not the market rate at the time. Whoever else could have likely (and this is 100% subjective estimation here!) for 45-55 mil. But for 2 seasons he has very limited playing time.

In freshly concluded season 1502 minutes from all comps and just 821 minutes in EPL.
In first season 3087 minutes total and 1772 minutes in EPL.
Across 2 seaons he has scored 7 and assited 16 goals in all comps and 2 goals + 12 assists in EPL.

I think it is fair to say that he has not lived up to expectations. Clearly his value has not risen from the time he arrived. He is youngish but for 2 seasons there have been no step forward. In Transfermarkt value estimation his value has plummeted from 55 mil level (highest) to 35 mil even.
And for City he has been clearly outplayed by Semenyo who joined for 75 mil. So that means that Savinho should be worth less.

However you look and to which ever thing you compare / anchor it - 60 mil is not "regular fee" and seems much more than his real value is. I think 45 is already very borderline, everything else is absurd overpaying.

That being said - it might very well be that in the situation we are in and how badly we need additions - it might be that we are being forced to pay over the realistic value. But in general scale it is not "peanuts" or "just regular transfer" if we opt to pay that kind of money.
 
I've been reading the discussion here on the potential prices. And one thing really surprised/annoyed me.

People there tend to suggest that "oh, that is just inflation. You do not get much of a player for 60 mil these days!".
And it is one more line that is 100% factually wrong, even if it is repeated 10 000 times here. Just pile of shit. Lazy (or no) thinking. Clearly untrue.

In whole of EPL history there have been 61 (!) deals... across all of the teams across all the years where the transfer fee has exceeded 60 million. Also season by season number of such deals has been -
25/26 - 15
24/25 - 3
23/24 - 10
22/23 - 8
21/22 - 3
And in total 22 times before that.
From these 61 how many have been made by other teams than oil clubs (Shitty, Chelscum) + Woolwich, Pool and Manu?
Well exactly 8 times. And that number is evenly split between Newcastle (Isak, Woltemade, Elanga, Tonali) and ourselves (Xavi, Solanke, Kudus, Ndombele). From these 8 only Isak and Woltemade were significantly over 60 mil (both ~75) others were either 65 or below.

So transfer outlay of 60 million euro is an exceptionally high amount. And it is black and white fact. Despite what people "feel".

And what considers Savinho individually - well he did arrive to much fanfare from related club Girona. His reported transfer value was 25 mil EUR which was not the market rate at the time. Whoever else could have likely (and this is 100% subjective estimation here!) for 45-55 mil. But for 2 seasons he has very limited playing time.

In freshly concluded season 1502 minutes from all comps and just 821 minutes in EPL.
In first season 3087 minutes total and 1772 minutes in EPL.
Across 2 seaons he has scored 7 and assited 16 goals in all comps and 2 goals + 12 assists in EPL.

I think it is fair to say that he has not lived up to expectations. Clearly his value has not risen from the time he arrived. He is youngish but for 2 seasons there have been no step forward. In Transfermarkt value estimation his value has plummeted from 55 mil level (highest) to 35 mil even.
And for City he has been clearly outplayed by Semenyo who joined for 75 mil. So that means that Savinho should be worth less.

However you look and to which ever thing you compare / anchor it - 60 mil is not "regular fee" and seems much more than his real value is. I think 45 is already very borderline, everything else is absurd overpaying.

That being said - it might very well be that in the situation we are in and how badly we need additions - it might be that we are being forced to pay over the realistic value. But in general scale it is not "peanuts" or "just regular transfer" if we opt to pay that kind of money.

Good points.

This is probably why, had the DL/JL still been in charge, this would have dragged on all summer. Similarly, there is no way on God’s earth they sanction £50m on a player with one year left.

The Lewis 2.0 regime are making a point of getting deals done quickly for players that have been clearly identified. Which I guess means we overpay at times.

The point is - there is probably some value in overpaying for your first choice if it saves haggling all summer only to then lose out and have to overpay for the 3rd choice anyway on deadline day!!

And if the data / analysis that lead to Savio being our number one pick for two summers in a row is correct, and he fulfils the potential they are gambling on, £60m could turn out a great piece of business.
 
Back
Top