I don't watch Chelsea that much but whenever I did and this guy played he looked good to me.I find it hard to honestly judge Mudryk based on Chelsea's season.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
I don't watch Chelsea that much but whenever I did and this guy played he looked good to me.I find it hard to honestly judge Mudryk based on Chelsea's season.
Kane wants to go and he will be doing us a massive favour if he goes to Bayern, we get a fee and we don't see him line up for United or the Chavs.Harry Kane can do what he wants.
Levy has no control over this.
If Levy wants to sell; Kane does not have to go.
What does look more and more possible is that unless Kane agrees to be sold, for the fee that Levy wants; Spurs will not complete the deals that need to be done for the central defenders this team is desperate for.
The rumour was that VDV had agreed personal terms.
What else could be holding the deal up?
I obviously meant over the period described on the original post.Not to me.
I started supporting Spurs in 77.
Before Fergie's 92 team Spurs were better than United over my first 15 years as a supporter.
Kane wants to go and he will be doing us a massive favour if he goes to Bayern, we get a fee and we don't see him line up for United or the Chavs.
As for VDV, we just don't want to pay the fee.
Those of us with Levy radar know that if Kane is to be sold it will be at the last minute as the window is closing.Such a shambles. Peasantry of the highest order, similar approach to Mike Ashley albeit slightly less of a cunt but still an absolutely power crazed, megalomaniacal tyrant
This is possibly not true, but IF it is we need to be on this!
This is the guy Hojbjerg should be!
Don't see why Fulham would give him up, especially for £40m, and ESPECIALLY knowing Spammers got £105m for Rice.
This is possibly not true, but IF it is we need to be on this!
This is the guy Hojbjerg should be!
Shockingly, that’s what happens in a transfer window.The smoke and mirrors will probably be 2-3 players arriving, at the same time
Solomon was about the same standard as him for ShakatarI find it hard to honestly judge Mudryk based on Chelsea's season. He got thrust into the league off the back of a ridiculously large fee and then spent most of the season managed by Frank Lampard in a team that had nothing to play for and really couldn't care.
I would not be surprised to see both him and Enzo Fernandes start to look more like actual footballers next season. They will both always come under scrutiny and be under the microscope due to their transfer fees but I think both will end up being productive for them.
This is possibly not true, but IF it is we need to be on this!
This is the guy Hojbjerg should be!
For next season we will have a new manager and new coaches. We will play a different formation and be using different tactics. I reckon it’s a learning curve for all players at the club , old and new. That’s why it is very important that we get the new boys in a.s.a.p in order for them to gel and adapt as soon as possible.Well fucking obviouslyI'm sure clubs would all have been happy with all their signings completed in May.
But it's one big fucking reach to think we in would be in any way hindered if we signed a centre back on the 1st of August
We don't just need defenders but quality ones, if we go for Fazio quality we just end up making more problems for ourselves.Or we don’t want to pay the fee they want just like any team in the history of transfers when buying a player. Or they have agreed the fee but not how it’s going to be paid or when. Basically we don’t know, so no point getting our tits in a twist about it. But the club know we need defenders, it’s been said twenty times since the window opened.
It just delays the need to get rid for another year.In some cases I would agree; but if it's the only way to shift a 5-10m wage for another year then so be it......... No point having half a dozen un-registered players just kicking around with the kids for the fuck of it.
Not giving an opinion on the player except he looked a talent for France and can also play off the right wing.
For those reasons it could be sensible.
But they would want more than we’d get for Kane and it’s 99% not happening for that reason