DONE DEAL: Tottenham’s Harvey White completes transfer to Stevenage
We finally have our own homegrown Gary Rootbeer!
Godspeed Mr White
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Whole forum full of gullible idiots. Some are probably 13. Some are probably 73. Both just finding the Internet and completely oblivious to pathological liars.
If someone else doesn't get him, I can see him being a hot property with 1 year left on his deal.
Top 6 net spending 23/24 so far:
Chelsea = £197m. Responded to their poor 22/23 season
Woolwich = £167m. Spent big f them
Man UTD = £150m. Normal spending
Spurs = £135m (inc loaners Porro & Kulu, £70m both). Excluding loans became permanent didn't recruit enough where matters to address poor 22/23 season and Kane's departure
Man city = £126m. Steady eddy
Liverpool = £111m. Another steady eddy. £150m plus Salah to Saudia may still happen
Nope- definitely prefer Maddison to Mount, and think we found great value for him.Would you had preffered we bought maddison to mount so that our net spend figure was greater?
Bascially, we should not count €70m of Porro & Kulu fees in either window..... That's the schtick.
Levy already included the Kulu and Porro fees in the statement the board put out half way through last season stating we had spent 200m.Bollox to inclduing Kulu or Porro in the rebuild spend after a poor season.
They both played in that poor season.
That's just scammy.
Ironically in his (limited) pre season appearances he looked better.
You can't add up, can you?
VdV is a CB, so that's 1.
The Kane money was spent on....
£16m - Vicario
£40m - Maddison
£40m - VdV
£15m - Veliz
£3m - Philips
£45m - Johnson
Appreciate you haven't got enough fingers for this, so here goes...
£159,000,000 spent
Plus Porro fee £40m
Plus Kulu fee £25m
That's comfortably over £200m
We got (up to) £100m for Kane and £10m for Winks
So went spent the Kane money. And we spent the Winks money. And we spent about £100m more.
As is often the case with us, it's not how much we've spent, it's how we've spent it. Only time will tell tbh
we as a fanbase can either include it in the last window or this window (it's doesn't really matter).Bascially, we should not count €70m of Porro & Kulu fees in either window..... That's the schtick.
If Bentancur is a month away from a come back the Gallagher thing never made much sense.
Thats what you guys were saying for years 10 years ago. All that happened was the excuses changed.
The manager recommended three CBs and that wee bastard didn’t buy one.
So where is the Kane money going to Levy, your mate who’s in deep shit in USA?????
Nope- definitely prefer Maddison to Mount, and think we found great value for him.
You said, "explain to me how according to your chart that once again we have a higher net spend than City and Liverpool?"
My answer was FFP.
There really isn't much more to it.
Levy already included the Kulu and Porro fees in the statement the board put out half way through last season stating we had spent 200m.
If they now try to include the Kulu and Porro money in any statement they put out for this window then they are plain and simply trying to con us.