• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers Summer Transfer Thread 2023! - Closed (Maybe)

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Rate this window out of 10

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10


Results are only viewable after voting.
Cheers.

Thanks for your interesting stance and good luck with the pro ENIC propaganda.

I wouldn't want to be you in the weeks ahead if Sanchez is still in town......

:dembelelol:
Idiot Are You Stupid GIF by Bounce
 
To be fair the targets we are linked with Tapsoba, VDV, Muani, Veiga I won’t complain if we get them.

Major issue with this club is each and every season we leave a big hole in the team, can be goalkeeper, defender, midfielder, attacker. Either way some additional spending should at least prevent that issue which always fucks us.

Won’t solve everything as you need vision to go with spending if you want to try to win titles.


From what i have read, heard, if Kane goes then Richy will lead the line?

I am not saying another striker won't come in, but it will likely be for cover.
 
Last edited:
How about this for a proposition:

We sell Kane to BM this summer for €100m with a buy-back clause over next 3 years dropping to €90m in 24, €75m in 25 and €55m in 26
Linked to the deal we sign this Tel kid from them for €25m offering a similar-ish buy back in reverse €40m in 24, €50m in 25 and €55m in 26.

It could essentially equate to us being cost neutral in 3 years time (albeit having had the larger chunk now which benefits FFP).

Kane gets to go and win his easy trophies but with a return all but guaranteed. We get the Kane shaped hole filled by the highly rated youngster which presumably they’ll be happy with him returning as a 21 year old with minutes under his belt.

Appreciate loads of pitfalls and would be unlikely but trying to think of positive ways if he does leave.

For the record I’d rather NOT sell him at all this summer even if we risk losing him for free next year
 
How about this for a proposition:

We sell Kane to BM this summer for €100m with a buy-back clause over next 3 years dropping to €90m in 24, €75m in 25 and €55m in 26
Linked to the deal we sign this Tel kid from them for €25m offering a similar-ish buy back in reverse €40m in 24, €50m in 25 and €55m in 26.

It could essentially equate to us being cost neutral in 3 years time (albeit having had the larger chunk now which benefits FFP).

Kane gets to go and win his easy trophies but with a return all but guaranteed. We get the Kane shaped hole filled by the highly rated youngster which presumably they’ll be happy with him returning as a 21 year old with minutes under his belt.

Appreciate loads of pitfalls and would be unlikely but trying to think of positive ways if he does leave.

For the record I’d rather NOT sell him at all this summer even if we risk losing him for free next year
Tel doesn't want to come here, and why would we replace Kane with a teenager with a buyback clause.
 
How about this for a proposition:

We sell Kane to BM this summer for €100m with a buy-back clause over next 3 years dropping to €90m in 24, €75m in 25 and €55m in 26
Linked to the deal we sign this Tel kid from them for €25m offering a similar-ish buy back in reverse €40m in 24, €50m in 25 and €55m in 26.

It could essentially equate to us being cost neutral in 3 years time (albeit having had the larger chunk now which benefits FFP).

Kane gets to go and win his easy trophies but with a return all but guaranteed. We get the Kane shaped hole filled by the highly rated youngster which presumably they’ll be happy with him returning as a 21 year old with minutes under his belt.

Appreciate loads of pitfalls and would be unlikely but trying to think of positive ways if he does leave.

For the record I’d rather NOT sell him at all this summer even if we risk losing him for free next year
We lose that deal very badly.

Any buyback is just getting cucked
 
so wait..

we targeted Tosin and simply refused to bid weeks ago...

Fofana then got injured and Chavski decided to buy a central defender from Monaco in the matter of days to replace injured player...

Monaco then decide to buy Tosin to replace their player

we still have our fingers up our arses trying to get an orgasm.
 
So if we do avg 150m per season can I claim 200m instead too?

Fuck Woolwich and fuck polishing them up at our expense.

P.s. what are you doing in this other than being awkward?
it's ridiculous and delusional to somehow downplay or deny that Kroenke over the last few years hasnt backed Woolwich.

Your splitting hairs at the figure the previous poster stated but his actual point was valid.
 
so wait..

we targeted Tosin and simply refused to bid weeks ago...

Fofana then got injured and Chavski decided to buy a central defender from Monaco in the matter of days to replace injured player...

Monaco then decide to buy Tosin to replace their player

we still have our fingers up our arses trying to get an orgasm.
Glad we didn't go for Tosin, he was for sale and not a single Premier League team showed any serious interest. We should have brought in at least one centre back by now, but not that one.
 
it's ridiculous and delusional to somehow downplay or deny that Kroenke over the last few years hasnt backed Woolwich.

Your splitting hairs at the figure the previous poster stated but his actual point was valid.
Whatever's going on there, they finished 6 places above us and are in Europe. We're starting with one decent acquisition (Maddison) , a non PL manager and domestic games only. So love them or hate them, our supporters have no grounds for criticising them so vehemently.
 
Back
Top