I meant we won't spend that much on both. I think VDV is a done deal
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
I meant we won't spend that much on both. I think VDV is a done deal
You forgot Maradona...A long line is stretching it tbf
Ardiles, Villa and Poch ..........the rest forget about it
How does he rate against VVD has to be the question - if VVD going for 50m (= £43m) is Schuurs better or worse ?
hardly anyone pissed about and moaned when we paid that for Sanchez.Same reason people piss about and moan about Sanchez for 40m, I suspect.....
Clubs have budgets and aside from a select 4 or 5 clubs in the world; expensive duds can be harmful.
Pretty basic stuff.
Can you imagine if M'bappe went to Saudi after all?I think we need to stop referring to the market as inflated and instead just accept it as the market.
We seem to have been discussing it as inflated for a decade now as if it is a temporary thing, when in reality it just rises and rises and rises and when you think it can't rise anymore something else comes along and adds to the insanity.
Poch did play a half fit Kane and a fully fit Sissoko and we all know how it ended.
A FULLY RESTED Dembele was the difference in my view. You won’t change it. And if I’m wrong, he should have been replaced in the window he left without hesitation.
Not according to that CP fan thread.
Plays CCB or RCB in a 3 but played LCB and RCB in a 4 for Ajax.
Seems like he's the "plays either side" option like Tapsoba or Tosin.
VDV and Schuurs all dutch incoming has a Vertonghen and Toby vibe to it.
Who had the better developement plan?
Skipp & Kane
or
KWP & Tanganga
This is literally just saying stuff.
Getting 500mins (which he likely still wouldn't get!) is a waste of a cruicial year's development.
He's the cats whiskers
hardly anyone pissed about and moaned when we paid that for Sanchez.
Regardless, VDV price was always reported in the 30-40m range. It's not even much of a jump to even complain about anyway.

Could be buying an interesting partnership if we buy both - both played for Dutch u21's between 2018 and 2021 playing 17 times each.
So likely know each others game - which was one of the advantages of Vertonghen/Alderweireld duo who had played with each for years for Ajax and Belgium - which de-risks buying both a lot
This thread is pure Ange porn.
Also has the hallmarks of the Vicario deal where Leverkeusen won't budge on Tapsoba, so we just quickly pull the trigger out of nowhere on the player out of nowhere.
VDV and Schuurs make it fucking happen bald man.
Coming back to this debate and thinking about Levy leading the negitations...
Anyone else thinking this one might collapse? or drag on?
You really think both are possible?
I can only imagine it would be if van de Ven is seen as more of a left back
Thanks for the info DanielThat's much been my view since the beginning of this exchange.
We could have had Tielemans on loan that Jan; which would have been perfect (an eager to impress Tielemans is a good player; a Tielemans who's subsequently granted a contract is a lazy man)..... Poch wasn't interested.