Richarlison is Kane's replacement.
N'dombele was Dembele's replacement.
Reguillon was Danny Rose's replacement.
Serge Aurier was Kyle Walker's replacement.
Lo Celso was Eriksen's replacement.
Do you see a pattern emerging?
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Transfers Summer Transfer Thread 2023! - Closed (Maybe)
- Thread starter Fattynomates
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
N'dombele was Dembele's replacement.
Reguillon was Danny Rose's replacement.
Serge Aurier was Kyle Walker's replacement.
Lo Celso was Eriksen's replacement.
Do you see a pattern emerging?
Sounds a bit like cherry picking to me.
Beyond being a great footballer, Harry Kane is also uncommitted to the project, and him staying at the club without re-signing would be a source of unending distraction. He needs to be moved on.
Yup, and that makes you worried!
Like it wasn't enough with the rest of the circus going on!
Turd polishing is the correct definition.
That we've bought players that didn't work out, or didn't suit our style of play at the time?
Or do you think they were all cheap punts?
Edit - ps, wasn't Aurier a replacement for Trippier?
Who sanctioned the signing of these players?
Richarlison a isn't like for like with Kane. And he was already at the club with Kane.
The team is going in a different direction with a different style of forward players.
if we sign Orban are you seriously going to say he's a Kane replacement?
Now, if we do something dumb like bringing in Taremi who is older and similar to Kane, then have a rant about bringing in inferior replacements.
The regime has zero bearing on Harry Kane. Even if we changed ownership tomorrow, if Kane does not renew he will have to leave.
Remind me; what did Clive win (other than a Golden boot) during the 'Glory', "big club" days you want back?
Seemingly; it's your memory that is somewhat fucked (as always)......
Last edited:
Both true.
If we had new owners and Kane refused to sign, they would need to sell him too.
You didn't answer the question......
But the players that you're saying we downgraded on must have replaced those before them?
Were they bad replacements too?
There was no European football due to English clubs being banned during Clive Allen's time with the club.
Spurs were competitive at the time though.
The 86 / 87 team in particular.
Gary Lineker was signed as Clive Allen's replacement.
Try harder.
Think it's a bit late for that, Kane has gone, hope for the best.
Probably the same person who sanctioned the signings of the players that they replaced.
Look at Bale, who sanctioned his move to RM? But then who sanctioned his signing from Southampton?
The irony of your stupidity is lost on you... To a scary extent.
No.
Paul Mitchell in particular did a great job.
He was put on gardening leave for 18 months and constructively dismissed.