So, to summarise, if Harry Kane doesn't play tomorrow he's definitely off but if Harry Kane does play tomorrow he's definitely off.
Last edited:
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Transfers Summer Transfer Thread 2023! - Closed (Maybe)
- Thread starter Fattynomates
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Not sure I have heard those words on here massive ambition.
Isn´t it fantastic that SC seems to have been able to gather ALL the Spurs ITK´s out there??SC saying Kane to Bayern is basically done at £110m (130m EUR) inclusive of add ons. Doubt we will get that much but if we did you have to say a deal we can’t turn down.
[Update 32] The Goat on Harry Kane
Who: The Goat When: 5th August Where: SC The Goat hears that Bayern have ponied up and the ball is with team Kane now. Also, that all inclusive, the total fee for Kane will reach somewhere around the £110m markwww.spurscommunity.co.uk
Of course, as much as I want Kane to stay, the club is bigger than any player.
We have to hope that, we buy well and continue to perform.
How funny would it be if , he obviously leaves, and spurs win something
Would be fantastic.
Best pay, they are the Man City of ITK cash humping the deluded.
I still think there might be a twist here.
It's a strange move at 30 years of age, I am assuming not being a Gernan speaker and with a wife and 4 kids.
In my simple mind there seems some illogic here but equally I am past caring as long as we show we can deliver in the bloke's absence.
Why did we sign a backup-striker for £60mil?? That´s the Kane replacement right there, no fucking way Levy would spend £60mil on a backup-striker!
Not much of a source but I wonder if City have learned their lesson about selling a very good player to a domestic rival:
Well we all have our different areas of expertise and knowledge!
Last edited:
I think most of us knew that Richarlison was always an insurance policy.
Of course, one goal in the league suggests it was a bad policy.
Bit different.
Richarlison can play left wing and striker, was 25 years old, Premier league proven and had mileage with Son and Kane entering their 30s
Taremi is 31. Never played higher than Portuguese league and is not suited to Ange style football
Do it. Although I expect we would have to sell a couple of players first or else our squad will be huge.
Last edited:
[LINEUP][/LINEUP
I think most of us now accept Kane has gone. That's relatively simple.
What is not good is the idea of us failing to replace Kane with another striker.
If we don't address it, I think we are walking right into some quicksand.[/LINEUP]
I think most of us now accept Kane has gone. That's relatively simple.
What is not good is the idea of us failing to replace Kane with another striker.
If we don't address it, I think we are walking right into some quicksand.[/LINEUP]
2022 - sign Richarlison because Conte wanted him. Cover for both LW and Striker. Best Chelsea for his signature
2023 - Levy knew we’d have the worst season in years and bought Richarlison because Kane would be off.
You’d think Levy would make better decisions if he had such amazing foresight