It will retain the structure, with fewer teams, because no, no one really cares about Grand Canyon University if we can jump straight to, and be guaranteed without interference from anonymous schools, watching UCLA vs Kansas.Yeah this really gets at the nugget of it.
In 2023 one can adopt a posture of savvy knowingness on the internet articulating that consumers are hogs and they will accept whatever The Powers That Be give them because they're slack-jawed rubes who don't know any different and have no other choice anyway.
I really think in the entertainment industry specifically (of which sports is a part), that notion is not going to age well over the next decade or so.
Capitalism ruthlessly serves the consumer dollar. There has been a forgetting of that in media, and when you find yourself afield of that core principal, you get punished.
Yeah we're just not on the same page here.
The College Football Super League, which is an inevitability now (to the sport's detriment), will find a way to retain the March Madness structure, because it goes without saying that the structure of the competition is inherent to its value proposition and it's a multibillion dollar cash cow in its own right despite being a dramatically less popular sport overall.
You're batting 1.000 at terrible sports business prognostication, and don't even see it. You're standing there, straight faced, arguing that college football super league is obviously happening before our eyes, yet applying to other sports all the same failed arguments about tradition, and history, and cultural significance others previously used for why it wouldn't happen.
It's all about the money. Daniel Levy, unfortunately, will win.