What is the claim here, exactly?
I also note how careful you're being to avoid the word "continuity" since Liverpool changed managers last offseason.
I have said or implied nothing to do with continuity.
The claim is that "the best squad" is not only heavily fickle, but it is also not really relevant.
Did Leicester have a better squad that us when they won the PL or the FA Cup? Did Crystal Palace? I don't even think Chelsea had that good of a squad when Conte beat us to the title. A lot of it is about cohesion.
I mean the ink is hardly dry on Kudus and people have got over it. It's a weird dopamine hit, and no one cares about what the manager actually wants - they just want to have some kind of little cup for spending the most in the transfer window. The best teams are built not bought