The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Depends on what position it's for.
Harsh on Bentancur I think, you're right he's not elite, but he's nowhere near a liability either. Under a competent coach, in a proper system, he'll be perfectly serviceable.Extending Bentancur's contract = wrong. Guy is a liability, not an elite player...and let's be honest, he's a right dickhead.
Offering Micky a juicy new deal = wrong. The best ability is availability. Take his pace away and he's nothing special. Guy is a giant, can't even head the ball.
Multiplying Bergvall's wages by 5 ot 6 = wrong. Sure I love the kid and he's been great, but putting him on 85k pw already, that's daft. Give him 45k, it's already a big rise. Kid is 19 and he's not even got a full season under his belt.
Signing Tel for 50 mil = wrong.
But Levy.
Yes, he's a liability in my books. He can't stay fit a whole season (though he's done better on that front this year), his discipline on & off the pitch is questionable (to put it mildly). Play him vs a decent MF duo or trio and he's getting bummed. Definitely not our worst player and sure, under a better coach and with better teammates round him he'd likely improve, but I still think he's not at the level. No way he'd start for City, Woolwich, Liverpool...but they're serious clubs and we aren't. If we were, he's a bench player.Harsh on Bentancur I think, you're right he's not elite, but he's nowhere near a liability either. Under a competent coach, in a proper system, he'll be perfectly serviceable.
100% re Bergvall.Correct on new deals for VDV/Bergval. Rewarding them too early on the back of some media hype, both have some nice moments, but ultimately have produced fuck all of real value in terms of the big picture. I can see the point to rewarding them, but it should be by smaller increments.
Sure re first part. But tell you what, I'll trust Bayern's judgment. They know a thing or two about top players, even young ones. If they're happy to let him go, maybe that tells us something. He's done alright here, but no way we should spend 50 mil on him. But then again we spent 65 in Dom, 60 on Richy, 50 on Brennan, 40 on Mads, 40 on Archie, 35 on Biss, 30 on Odobert...Tel, impossible to judge anyone accurately under an idiot manager. There's a risk that we sign him for £50m and it's a total catastrophe, but there's an equal risk that we pass up the opportunity and he goes on to be a star elsewhere.
I've seen plenty of games where I didn't even realise Bentancur was playing. Since his injury, he's largely been a passenger and had little or no positive impact on games.Harsh on Bentancur I think, you're right he's not elite, but he's nowhere near a liability either. Under a competent coach, in a proper system, he'll be perfectly serviceable.
Correct on new deals for VDV/Bergval. Rewarding them too early on the back of some media hype, both have some nice moments, but ultimately have produced fuck all of real value in terms of the big picture. I can see the point to rewarding them, but it should be by smaller increments.
Tel, impossible to judge anyone accurately under an idiot manager. There's a risk that we sign him for £50m and it's a total catastrophe, but there's an equal risk that we pass up the opportunity and he goes on to be a star elsewhere.
I've seen plenty of games where I didn't even realise Bentancur was playing. Since his injury, he's largely been a passenger and had little or no positive impact on games.
The standard that some people have for what type of players that we are meant to get is just odd.people already have Danso on their sell list despite being good looooooool.
9 out of 10 window