This whole thing about managers need time is a load of old bollocks.
There are so many examples of managers coming in and making immediate impacts at clubs. The default argument always seems to be "managers need time". They don't, and they rarely get it for obvious reasons.
It's a game of football. People try to overcomplicate it, like managers need to come in and work out quantum theory before they can get performances and results. It's a game, it's 11 v 11, a manager can come in and get results just by motivating the players more than the opposition, especially with a squad like ours.
Sure, motivation often doesn't work if you are Burnley playing City, but if you are Spurs, a manager getting the players fighting for their shirt will beat the likes of Fulham and Forest most of the time, and they will certainly put up better showings against the likes of Chelsea and Woolwich. Or evewn if results are not there, they go down punching. Where was the punching in those games eh?
This is for me where it is obvious Frank is not the right man.
The absolute bare minimum of a manager is to get fight, blood, sweat and tears out of players, the tactics and style of playing does take time. But if you aren't even doing the first bit, why should you stay?
Dyche came in at freefall Forest, wins at Anfield 3 nil, beats us 3 nil. ANd that's mostly just by getting the players pumped up and fighting for their shirt. Klopp made an immediate impact at Liverpool.
Emery turned it around instantly at Villa.
We have a lot of talented players even if we do need to upgrade on a few others. You can't tell me an attack with Muani, Simons and Kudus can't muster a short on target in 90 minutes against Forest? absolute bollocks.