• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Thomas Frank

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Are you Frank Out or In?


  • Total voters
    623
Now you're definitely off your trolley.

Ange spent over £400m and took us from 5th to 17th ffs :ange-facepalm:
Took us from 8th to 5th, back into Europe and won the bloody thing! Finished 17th but stil found a way to get us back in the champions league.

All while blooding some of our most exciting prospects we have in our team now.

Having to use Foster in goal, Davies as a CB... A 18 year old Gray at CB for half the season.

The guy had a vision for our club and was backing up all his talk. He deserved to have this season and everyone calling for him to be sacked, talking nonsense about Frank, now have to face it was the WRONG decision.
 
Werner, Gray, Bergvall (came in from the summer before) , Odobert and Solanke is not exactly what I would call backing a manager?

Gray and Berg both 18 year old youth players. Odobert bought from Burnley being like 19 himself.

The signings made this summer in terms of player standings and experience has to be up there in all of the windows I can remember as a spurs fan. Many on here were saying it was a 8+ / 10 window.
LOL they came in when Postecoglou was manager. Frank has been given two players, and 2 loanees.

Postecoglou got much more backing than Frank. That might change as time passes but Simons has been pretty shit and Palhinha is the least complete player I've seen in a long time. And he got Kudus from the mighty West Ham.

Honestly dude, just admit you're wrong about this claim and move on. VDV and Maddison are more than Frank has got on their own, nothing as good in comparison.

You're simply wrong with this, your best bet now is to either admit you're wrong or stay quiet, I sure as hell ain't going to continue to fight a battle that I've already won.
 
LOL they came in when Postecoglou was manager. Frank has been given two players, and 2 loanees.

Postecoglou got much more backing than Frank. That might change as time passes but Simons has been pretty shit and Palhinha is the least complete player I've seen in a long time. And he got Kudus from the mighty West Ham.

Honestly dude, just admit you're wrong about this claim and move on. VDV and Maddison are more than Frank has got on their own, nothing as good in comparison.

You're simply wrong with this, your best bet now is to either admit you're wrong or stay quiet, I sure as hell ain't going to continue to fight a battle that I've already won.
Sounds like the Ange pull helped bring those players in then I guess? Rather than all the rejections we faced this summer?

VDV was an unknown until he was bought. Everyone on this forum was twerking for Paulinha and Kudus as well as Xavi.

Regardless of whether they're loans - they're top, experienced internationals who most were excited for. I'd argue most of those signings seem underwhelming because the football we're playing this season is dreadful - backed up by the stats.
 
Having to use Foster in goal, Davies as a CB...

Heaven forbid! A centre back at centre back

Season 18 Omg GIF by America's Got Talent



I'm sure we're all very bored of hearing how Ange wasn't completely shit because the wind was blowing in an unfair direction

Perhaps you can pop along to the Forest forums and convinced them with xG stats.
 
I hope you are right and I think 4 pts minimum from the next two games is a must or he could be in trouble. I think the Villa cup game is so important for him. If that goes wrong he’ll be out.
Yeah i get it mate, it feels like hes only a couple of bad results away from getting sacked especially if the fans get more disillusioned.

January is a huge month we'll see how we come out the end of it and if hes still here, I guess
 
LOL they came in when Postecoglou was manager. Frank has been given two players, and 2 loanees.

Postecoglou got much more backing than Frank. That might change as time passes but Simons has been pretty shit and Palhinha is the least complete player I've seen in a long time. And he got Kudus from the mighty West Ham.

Honestly dude, just admit you're wrong about this claim and move on. VDV and Maddison are more than Frank has got on their own, nothing as good in comparison.

You're simply wrong with this, your best bet now is to either admit you're wrong or stay quiet, I sure as hell ain't going to continue to fight a battle that I've already won.

Don't worry, it's the same old vacant definition of "backing the manager" that Poch had.

e.g. the manager wasn't backed unless all the players turned into superstars

But of course that's a catch 22 when the manager thinks coaching is getting a bus to the match.
 
5th or above - stay
6th or 7th - ok but short leash
8th or below - sacked

This is not relative to Frank. It's relative to anyone managing Spurs in a full season who had a full pre season and spent 200m in the transfer window.

I'd go as low as 9th with "clear improvement towards back end of season" but yours is a fair take for sure
 
It's an interesting question, well two questions really:
1. In July, what end-of-season league position would people have considered the difference between success and failure for Frank?
2. And what about right now? (if it's different - I don't think it is for me, or certainly not much - perhaps I'll allow him 2 positions leeway due to having no Dom, Kulu or Mads for so long)

For me, given the squad he has at his disposal, I'd say 10th or above would be reasonably successful as long as there are positive signs in the actual play and performances (would have been 8th with a full squad). 11th or lower would be unacceptable. I know they are relatively arbitrary numbers, and I know other factors definitely come into play (for example, our stats, xG etc, being either staying very low or gradually improving etc) but I wonder where 'the line' is for others. (And of course that line might be in a totally different place for the Board).
1) establish a blueprint that shows a forward thinking style of play

2) intergrate young players

3) make an effort towards addressing our weakness in midfield (a lack of a passing conductor) - as proof that he understands what was needed to achieve (1)

4) Pure results, barring a disaster become an afterthought, as long as he showed he is laying foundations.

———————-
Frank has failed at 1) his style of play is awful and he thinks he is still at Brentford.

2) very meh. Seemed to have tilted towards Gray recently but he must have Bentancur/Palhinha on the pitch by law.

3) signed Palhinha. Sackable offence and showed he was aiming for 10th not 5th.

4) he’s not developing much, he’s just trying to survive game-by-game. If you want to play that ugly, then you better win.
 
Tbh if he came back as some kind of partner with Amanda under a Qatari ownership I wouldn't be against it.
If the Qatari's come to Spurs, they're coming to win. Not to make up the numbers and milk the gravy train like we've been doing for the last 25 years.

I imagine him looking over at the new stadium with that wanting expression that is used by Gollum when he thinks of his precious ring.


my-precious-lotr.png
 
I said at the time he was an utterly uninspiring signing that showed a total lack of ambition...and got absolutely slaughtered for it

Everyone was making out he was some kind of coup!😂

This place is really weird sometimes.
I was right there with you. Hideously overrated player just because “he gets stuck in”. The excuses that are made for him is hilarious.

Him and Manuel Ugarte are twins - that’s why they both only lasted 12 months at real top clubs.
 
IMO Palinha isn't being used correctly. As someone else said he's the water carrier. His job IS to get stuck in, break the up play, win the ball and play it to one of the other two mids. Their job is then to create.
 
I said at the time he was an utterly uninspiring signing that showed a total lack of ambition...and got absolutely slaughtered for it

Everyone was making out he was some kind of coup!😂

This place is really weird sometimes.
Listening to some of the players during preseason interviews it seemed like Frank firstly wanted the team to become very difficult to score against, and it's probably why he wanted Palhinha, but we're still relatively easy to score against and Palhinha doesn't really have another useful attribute.

So may as well play Gray there because at least he has more than one string on his banjo.
 
I don’t want Iraola. I want Glasner.

Palace are struggling atm but they don’t have the squad; he’s playing his fourth game in 8 days this evening. That’s fucking mental and should be against the rules.

I see things he and his teams do that I just don’t see with Frank - plus Frank is supposed to be this super developer. That’s what we were told. He’s not improved anyone.


Iraola is a better fit for us than Glasner IMO.
Glasner's palace play in a similar way to franks Brentford.
The style of football is important to spurs fans we need a front footed manager not Glasner who is more a counter attacking guy
 
Last edited:
Back
Top