I would take top 8 as a successful season given where we started and the injury issues we’ve had.Frank faced coming into this season - not least the very unbalanced squad. Too 8 would have been a very good first season imo
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
I would take top 8 as a successful season given where we started and the injury issues we’ve had.Frank faced coming into this season - not least the very unbalanced squad. Too 8 would have been a very good first season imo
Took us from 8th to 5th, back into Europe and won the bloody thing! Finished 17th but stil found a way to get us back in the champions league.Now you're definitely off your trolley.
Ange spent over £400m and took us from 5th to 17th ffs![]()
LOL they came in when Postecoglou was manager. Frank has been given two players, and 2 loanees.Werner, Gray, Bergvall (came in from the summer before) , Odobert and Solanke is not exactly what I would call backing a manager?
Gray and Berg both 18 year old youth players. Odobert bought from Burnley being like 19 himself.
The signings made this summer in terms of player standings and experience has to be up there in all of the windows I can remember as a spurs fan. Many on here were saying it was a 8+ / 10 window.
Sounds like the Ange pull helped bring those players in then I guess? Rather than all the rejections we faced this summer?LOL they came in when Postecoglou was manager. Frank has been given two players, and 2 loanees.
Postecoglou got much more backing than Frank. That might change as time passes but Simons has been pretty shit and Palhinha is the least complete player I've seen in a long time. And he got Kudus from the mighty West Ham.
Honestly dude, just admit you're wrong about this claim and move on. VDV and Maddison are more than Frank has got on their own, nothing as good in comparison.
You're simply wrong with this, your best bet now is to either admit you're wrong or stay quiet, I sure as hell ain't going to continue to fight a battle that I've already won.
Yeah i get it mate, it feels like hes only a couple of bad results away from getting sacked especially if the fans get more disillusioned.I hope you are right and I think 4 pts minimum from the next two games is a must or he could be in trouble. I think the Villa cup game is so important for him. If that goes wrong he’ll be out.
LOL they came in when Postecoglou was manager. Frank has been given two players, and 2 loanees.
Postecoglou got much more backing than Frank. That might change as time passes but Simons has been pretty shit and Palhinha is the least complete player I've seen in a long time. And he got Kudus from the mighty West Ham.
Honestly dude, just admit you're wrong about this claim and move on. VDV and Maddison are more than Frank has got on their own, nothing as good in comparison.
You're simply wrong with this, your best bet now is to either admit you're wrong or stay quiet, I sure as hell ain't going to continue to fight a battle that I've already won.
5th or above - stay
6th or 7th - ok but short leash
8th or below - sacked
This is not relative to Frank. It's relative to anyone managing Spurs in a full season who had a full pre season and spent 200m in the transfer window.
We can consider Pavlidis from Benfica as a striker. He had 15 goals and 3 assists in 16 appearances so far. I know that the Portugal league is not PL but he also scores in international games including the 2 goals against England in Wembley's 1-2.
It appears that he is on 35 mil €. He is relatively tall (1.86) has both legs, he is clinical but can be spectacular at times.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QpNPP7n3ukA
1) establish a blueprint that shows a forward thinking style of playIt's an interesting question, well two questions really:
1. In July, what end-of-season league position would people have considered the difference between success and failure for Frank?
2. And what about right now? (if it's different - I don't think it is for me, or certainly not much - perhaps I'll allow him 2 positions leeway due to having no Dom, Kulu or Mads for so long)
For me, given the squad he has at his disposal, I'd say 10th or above would be reasonably successful as long as there are positive signs in the actual play and performances (would have been 8th with a full squad). 11th or lower would be unacceptable. I know they are relatively arbitrary numbers, and I know other factors definitely come into play (for example, our stats, xG etc, being either staying very low or gradually improving etc) but I wonder where 'the line' is for others. (And of course that line might be in a totally different place for the Board).
Tbh if he came back as some kind of partner with Amanda under a Qatari ownership I wouldn't be against it.
If the Qatari's come to Spurs, they're coming to win. Not to make up the numbers and milk the gravy train like we've been doing for the last 25 years.
I said at the time he was an utterly uninspiring signing that showed a total lack of ambition...and got absolutely slaughtered for it3) signed Palhinha. Sackable offence and showed he was aiming for 10th not 5th.
I was right there with you. Hideously overrated player just because “he gets stuck in”. The excuses that are made for him is hilarious.I said at the time he was an utterly uninspiring signing that showed a total lack of ambition...and got absolutely slaughtered for it
Everyone was making out he was some kind of coup!
This place is really weird sometimes.
That’s what I’m scared of. His outlook is pure Brentford. If Palhinha and Danso long throws were the answer, what’s the question?What is Ftank going to add is the question, even if we take that leap into the future, based on what he has done with us so far, and what anyone can sense with the players?
Listening to some of the players during preseason interviews it seemed like Frank firstly wanted the team to become very difficult to score against, and it's probably why he wanted Palhinha, but we're still relatively easy to score against and Palhinha doesn't really have another useful attribute.I said at the time he was an utterly uninspiring signing that showed a total lack of ambition...and got absolutely slaughtered for it
Everyone was making out he was some kind of coup!
This place is really weird sometimes.
I don’t want Iraola. I want Glasner.
Palace are struggling atm but they don’t have the squad; he’s playing his fourth game in 8 days this evening. That’s fucking mental and should be against the rules.
I see things he and his teams do that I just don’t see with Frank - plus Frank is supposed to be this super developer. That’s what we were told. He’s not improved anyone.
So we've gone from "any half decent manager will have us flying up the table" to "the right manager will get us up the table"
Well I think we can all agree on that. Because it's quite the climb down from the original claim.![]()