• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Thomas Frank

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Are you Frank Out or In?


  • Total voters
    623
Over the years on here I've been accused at times of being a 'Levy lover' or an 'ENIC lover' or whatever other nonsense the idiots on here say, but whatever good things I may attribute to them, the one thing they've always been totally clueless at is recruiting managers. (Btw I don't necessarily think we've been any worse at recruiting players than your average other club, there will always be some hits and more misses). My issue is that we don't seem to take any notice of the potential manager's typical style of play, nor the make-up of the squad that the outgoing manager has assembled, so instead we lurch from one style to another (or indeed to no style at all sometimes...), with a squad that never fits, which is just unforgiveable at this level.

I do understand what I perceive to have been the thought process behind some of the appointments after Poch:
  • Mourinho - "Poch has taken us so far, but is not a proven winner, that's what we need to get over the line"
  • (Nuno - doesn't really count as he was a desperate last resort after failing to get many others)
  • Conte - "Mourinho was a winner but he wasn't tough enough, Conte is a tough winner"
  • Ange - "Conte turned out to be a coward who took no responsibility for anything and basically set light to the club on his way out, also both he and Mourinho played boring football, fuck these arrogant 'super managers', let's just get someone who will play attacking football"
  • Frank - "Ange was recklessly attacking, let's get someone more stable"
(Not my words above obviously, but how I expect the board looked at it).

...and on it goes. So personally whilst I was reasonably ok with Frank being appointed, was eager to see his alleged ability to adapt for (and indeed during) games to get the best out of the squad and focus on opposition shortcomings, and hence still hope he will turn a corner and start improving us, he is still yet another wild lurch from one style of manager to a completely different style of manager (when surely what we all really wanted in a new manager was Postecoglou's attacking intent but without the ludicrous naivety and with some, well, actual coaching... whoever that might have been...)

I could see the logic of appointing him in the summer though. A manager not set in his ways with one style but one who is meant to be pragmatic and would change tactics as and when. The problem has been that he has done it too much and seem to focus on other teams and not us. I suspect he has been told in no uncertain terms now that he has to work on the team more. The fact that has come out in the press this week that the players are worried we don’t is actually a good thing as it means that there is a discussion. If he is talking to the players then that’s great if he is taking on some of their thoughts. That is good management and something some of our previous managers haven’t done in the past which has contributed to them losing their jobs.
 
I could see the logic of appointing him in the summer though. A manager not set in his ways with one style but one who is meant to be pragmatic and would change tactics as and when. The problem has been that he has done it too much and seem to focus on other teams and not us. I suspect he has been told in no uncertain terms now that he has to work on the team more. The fact that has come out in the press this week that the players are worried we don’t is actually a good thing as it means that there is a discussion. If he is talking to the players then that’s great if he is taking on some of their thoughts. That is good management and something some of our previous managers haven’t done in the past which has contributed to them losing their jobs.
Perhaps you're right, perhaps 'on paper' this was a managerial move more towards the middle than the extremes, which would be a good thing for a change (if it actually worked, as you say...). I guess I'm just so distrustful of our manager recruitment process since Poch that I struggle to believe we've really thought any manager through properly, but I do see your point on this one... Fingers crossed that's what the board thought, and fingers crossed Frank delivers on it...
 
My feeling towards Frank at the moment is the same as I had towards Poch at the beginning of his reign. Therefore I'm still hoping he'll turn it around, how long that will take, if ever, that's the million dollar question. Unfortunately the evidence points to him not being up to it :(
I have to add I haven’t the foggiest idea on who could do a good job for us, player or coach, then again, that's not my (very well-paid) job. I'm just a downtrodden supporter who has to put up with bad purchases and inadequate personnel at all levels of the club (board, coaching, medical - the list goes on!).
I have absolutely no idea who is realistic and would make a good manager, an issue with Frank I have is if you look on the official Spurs website there' s a video of his interview shortly after he was appointed, and he was talking about playing risk football, playing the ball forward etc... but he's not doing it in my opinion.

Here's a link to that video;


if you can't be bothered to watch it, he makes the following statements;

“I know the ethos and the history of the club is massive on attacking football, and there is so much attacking talent in the squad," said Frank. "I’m very, very big on principles and what we do in the final third in terms of creating chances.

“I always say this one-liner: if you don’t take risks, you also take risks. So it’s important we take risks. Risk is you need to play forward.

"If you don’t risk the ball, you can’t create things. We need to be brave."


Nobody in the media is holding him to task about this, probably because it's an exclusive interview for the club's private media, SPURS-PLAY or whatever it's called. Football London have surely seen it though, so I don't know...
 
I have absolutely no idea who is realistic and would make a good manager, an issue with Frank I have is if you look on the official Spurs website there' s a video of his interview shortly after he was appointed, and he was talking about playing risk football, playing the ball forward etc... but he's not doing it in my opinion.

Here's a link to that video;


if you can't be bothered to watch it, he makes the following statements;

“I know the ethos and the history of the club is massive on attacking football, and there is so much attacking talent in the squad," said Frank. "I’m very, very big on principles and what we do in the final third in terms of creating chances.

“I always say this one-liner: if you don’t take risks, you also take risks. So it’s important we take risks. Risk is you need to play forward.

"If you don’t risk the ball, you can’t create things. We need to be brave."


Nobody in the media is holding him to task about this, probably because it's an exclusive interview for the club's private media, SPURS-PLAY or whatever it's called. Football London have surely seen it though, so I don't know...
Yes I remember that interview, and he seemed to be talking the talk, but we can all do that!
I'm ok with giving him a bit more time, as Rome wasn't built in a day, but he needs to turn things around soon, as our patience will run thin before the end of the season.
 
He got 5th in his first season and displayed some epic games?

Won a trophy in his second despite some of the most ridiculous pressures I've ever seen a manager go through? Take it you've been a spurs fan for all over 2/3 year yeah? Otherwise you have a seriously short memory?

I'm up for giving the man a season but no context was afford at all to Ange which is absolutely madness. The disrespect given to him despite being an absolute bonafide spurs LEGEND from some of our "supporters" is absolutely disgraceful.

We've made some terrible decisions over the years, but the 'what if' with Ange feels like it will forever be the most haunting at this point. For both Tottenham and Ange..

Where would you have been on Ange had we lost the EL Final, a competition full of teams that we would (and most say top ten PL teams) would be expected to beat?

We were very lucky in some games to win, for example we struggled hugely in games against Coventry and Tamworth?

Losing a record twenty two games in his final season does not make him a "bonafide Spurs legend" does it? Had it not been for three more poor, in fact terrible teams below us we would have been relegated.

The Spurs board were absolutely correct to get rid of Ange, and his time at Forest proves if anything that the Premier League is one or two levels above is managerial ability. You could argue that most of the teams we played in the Europa League were as good if not a little better than those he competed against in the SPL and interestingly that Celtic haven't pursued Ange as a replacement for Rogers?

Anyway the bottom line is that all that glitters is not always gold, and that winning the Europa League (as much as it was good for the club and fans) covered up more of his evident managerial weaknesses, than his ability to manage a Premier League side.
 
Where would you have been on Ange had we lost the EL Final, a competition full of teams that we would (and most say top ten PL teams) would be expected to beat?

We were very lucky in some games to win, for example we struggled hugely in games against Coventry and Tamworth?

Losing a record twenty two games in his final season does not make him a "bonafide Spurs legend" does it? Had it not been for three more poor, in fact terrible teams below us we would have been relegated.

The Spurs board were absolutely correct to get rid of Ange, and his time at Forest proves if anything that the Premier League is one or two levels above is managerial ability. You could argue that most of the teams we played in the Europa League were as good if not a little better than those he competed against in the SPL and interestingly that Celtic haven't pursued Ange as a replacement for Rogers?

Anyway the bottom line is that all that glitters is not always gold, and that winning the Europa League (as much as it was good for the club and fans) covered up more of his evident managerial weaknesses, than his ability to manage a Premier League side.
Nobody gave us a chance of going away to Frankfurt and getting a result. Their striker was sold to Liverpool for 80m in the Summer yet we went there and won 1-0 against the odds. We were also underdogs in the final against a club who have won multiple trophies over the last 17 years while we won nothing. I'd call that a pretty good achievement. Really hate why our own fans love to diminish it.
 
Anyone who thinks Ange was or is a good manager and did well with what he had here is seriously deranged or intellectually not all there. I can't believe we still have to have these discussions. We finished 17th. Honestly. SEVENTEENTH.
 
Nobody gave us a chance of going away to Frankfurt and getting a result. Their striker was sold to Liverpool for 80m in the Summer yet we went there and won 1-0 against the odds. We were also underdogs in the final against a club who have won multiple trophies over the last 17 years while we won nothing. I'd call that a pretty good achievement. Really hate why our own fans love to diminish it.

They're either fake fans or are so afraid of fans of other clubs they'd rather parrot what they say about Spurs than be proud of the clubs achievments.

Ange with this squad would easily finish top 5 and seriously challenge for titles.
 
Didn't Thomas Frank say at the start of the season --"If you don't take risks you also take risks" .

We set up against scum with too much defence and no threat up front . The supporters were joking in the bar before the game about us losing but nobody could predict us going out in a whimper
Agree. His comments before and after the game, the set up and performances in this and the Chelsea game, the 0.0 xg - its terrible.
 
Anyone who thinks Ange was or is a good manager and did well with what he had here is seriously deranged or intellectually not all there. I can't believe we still have to have these discussions. We finished 17th. Honestly. SEVENTEENTH.

And fast forward to today, everyone wants to sack off the manager who is, so far, unbeaten in the CL and is 5 points off 2nd place in the table, despite having lost Son, having Bissouma lose the plot, a makeshift squad of injuries, no natural striker fit, and no maddison.

And you know 100% that if we did get rid of frank, all of the above would be used as reasons why the club is a laughing stock, as soon as Frank won a game at a different club
 
You mean there wasn't a top striker available at wages and transfer fee Levy / ENIC were prepared to pay
Sometimes that is true - but in that particular window, there wasn't a top striker available, not a EPL proven one anyway. (I know any player is theoretically 'available' for the right money, but all the best strikers were already at top clubs is what I mean). All I'm saying is that there were fewer good options that window than in the few windows before and after - we should have waited and signed a marquee striker in the next window, signing Richy was a poor decision.
 
Well there was. But he went to Newcastle.

I do think any top quality pure CF knew they would be playing second fiddle to Harry Kane hence why we signed a player comfortable playing in off the wing rather than a pure CF.

Wouldn't have called Woltemade top quality, if that's considered too quality then the striker market is really fucked.

Edit or did you mean Isak? :D

Either way neither was he.
 
I stop following and go do something useful when it gets to that point.

Many on here don’t when they get to that point which sucks.
Disappointed at a result, yes frustrated at a result, yes ……disappointed & frustrated at how we play if we don’t perform how we should and don’t give a 100% but for being stressed or getting angry at a result fuck that life’s too short.
 
Back
Top