Can he play clever triangles though?
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Conte had Kane. Ange did not have Kane. 5th in his first year was well above expectations!But Ange inherited largely the same team that Conte got 4th place in and was in the top 3 when sacked.
Technically speaking, Ange achieved less than his (full time) predecessor in his first season.
Not aimed at you - but a lot of fans didn't seem to notice that those first 10 games weren't all great. It tool 15+ minutes of time added on to turn a loss into a win at home to Sheff Utd. It took an injury time own goal and a disallowed goal to beat 9 man Liverpool at home.
After those first 10 it was one shocker after another.
88 minutes Vs Wolves and people were heaping praise on Dier and Davies for their CB display and ready to crown Angeloss the greatest of all time.
I literally said in the match thread at 1 nil up with minutes left that we'd lose that game.
We lost that game.
Some managers ride a wave from the former manager. Ramos rode the wave from Jol to win the league cup, but in truth, he was slowly destroying everything. Ange took over a team that was fairly confident in its ability to get top 4 and slowly dismantled it entirely.
It is 1 player, though.Conte had Kane. Ange did not have Kane. 5th in his first year was well above expectations!
Yea, which is why I don't blame the coach. Recruitment has been a huge issue.
If you look at teams like Aston Villa and Crystal Palace, they have a lot of players that'd start for us or be v close
Villa: Martinez, Tielemans, Onana, Kamara, McGinn, Watkins, Konsa.
All solid players. We could easily take 5/6 of those guys and make them starters if not first off the bench
Palace isn’t much different either.
Guehi, Mitchell, Muñoz, Sarr, Wharton, Mateta
When I tell people these teams are now just as good as us, they think I’m joking until they look at the lineups. 17th place wasn't a fluke.
Aka the Stoke/kane mutiny.
There was detailed Itk on the COYS forum at the time as to what happened after that defeat. I could search it out, it’s an interesting read.
13 matches, 18 points
18 ÷ 13 = 1.38 points per match
1.38 x 38 = 52.4.
So basically we're on a trajectory for 52 points.
Crystal Palace came 12th last season on 53 points.
Why do you think we targeted MGW & Eze?
The problem is we didn’t have an adequate backup plan and we ended up with Xavi.
That’s on the recruitment team IMHO!
You always say this without the appropriate context. I believe we were actually 4th when Conte left (?), but teams below us had games in hand, so if you judge it 'fairly', on points per game, or look at the league table once those games were played, it's more reflective of reality to say that we were 'doing 5th best' when Conte left. Your statement above may be true, but without the context it is misleading (just as it was the 999 other times you've said it).But Ange inherited largely the same team that Conte got 4th place in and was in the top 3 when sacked.
Last season:13 matches, 18 points
18 ÷ 13 = 1.38 points per match
1.38 x 38 = 52.4.
So basically we're on a trajectory for 52 points.
Crystal Palace came 12th last season on 53 points.
Also worth noting that Nuno was sacked being 9th in the league with 15 points after 10 matches.
It's just a guide using form up to this point, we all know things can improve or deteriorate as the season progresses.Last season:
13 matches, 20 points
18÷13 = 1.538
1.538×38 = 58.46
That worked out well didn'tit?
Think that game was after Kane came on and won a game against Villa. That was the start of Kanes rise under Poch.
There was fan pressure there to play Kane over Adebyeor IIRC.
52 is better than 3813 matches, 18 points
18 ÷ 13 = 1.38 points per match
1.38 x 38 = 52.4.
So basically we're on a trajectory for 52 points.
Crystal Palace came 12th last season on 53 points.
Nuno was sacked because it was obvious the fans unanimously hated that he was even appointed, much less still there.Also worth noting that Nuno was sacked being 9th in the league with 15 points after 10 matches.
So he had 3 less points but played 3 less matches than Frank to date.
15 ÷ 10 = 1.5 points per match.
1.5 x 38 = 57 so sacked Nuno has a better trajectory than Frank.
Fair comment. It’s the ‘deteriorate’ bit that worries me given our current trajectory.It's just a guide using form up to this point, we all know things can improve or deteriorate as the season progresses.
From memory there was a showdown after the stoke game. Kane, Mason and a couple of the others stood up to adebayor, Kaboul, Lennon etc. and Poch decided to stick with the youngsters. It’s what saw them and capoue leave the club asap afterwards. I think kaboul didn’t even play again for us.
The Villa game was when they could have been sacked by levy had they not won. But it was the stoke mutiny that was the actual turning point.
I’ll find it if it’s hidden away on there. It’s an interesting account. I remember it clearly at the time being correct.
Fair comment. It’s the ‘deteriorate’ bit that worries me given our current trajectory.
Agree with your general point about Poch and expectations but the pedant in me feels like I have to pick you up on this.
Describing Spurs Back 5 as a "headless chicken defence" feels unfair because it's simply not backed by the numbers.
When that Back 5 returned to selection availability in March 25 they started together in 6 games (all Europa League) and only conceded 3 goals.
When that same Back 5 played at the start of the 24/25 season after 11 games they'd conceded 13 goals - the same as Chavs, City, and one more than Scum. So not great by any means but hardly a disaster.
Obviously between game week 12 and March 25 the back 5 wasn't available for selection and even when they were Romero and VDV only started together in the League as a partnership twice in 3 months despite being available (they were saved for EL obviously - where, as we can see by the numbers, they conceded only .5 gpg)
Frank took over a Spurs team whose single, outlier, strength was its defence.
Edit: obviously it didn't feel this way because of clown games like Brighton away where our strength clearly cost us the game.
MGW is more of an 8 with attacking intent than a 10 IMHO!You don't read posts or think along too much, do you?
I am not talking about no 10 that is expected to make a final pass. Ffs we need someone to get from 25 meters from our goal to get the ball TO THE #10 player. That is what is completely missing and not addressed. I have little doubts that Eze would have done more than Xavi (most even half -adequate players would) but we need someone with great ability to find channels and accurate passes from our own half to the attacking third.