• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Thomas Frank

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Are you Frank Out or In?


  • Total voters
    623
Are we as bad as our results this season? No. Of course not...
Based on what? On the eye test, we look lucky not to be 3 or 4 down by half time in most games, and metrics like the xG table suggest that we are roughly where we deserve to be based on the football we've played. On top of that, when you consider that two of our wins were the first two games of the season, clearly we have gotten worse not better as the season has gone on, and we're in freefall now.

Not necessarily disagreeing with the rest of your post, and perhaps I'm misunderstanding you, but our performances under Frank have not deserved anything better than flirting with bottom 6. So if you mean our performances, yes they have been as bad as our league position suggests. If you mean 'is our squad really bottom 6 in the PL', then no, of course not. In which case it's primarily on Frank, sadly (as obviously he's a really nice bloke).
 
Very fair take. I just think his body of work over the years at Brentford indicates a good level of competency. I don't think Vinai is lying when he said their metrics had Frank as a stand out candidate for what they were looking for.

The "deeper issues" are simply we have a fanbase and club hierarchy that are demanding Top 5 results from a squad that is so unbalanced and lacking in top end quality that it is, sadly, mid table at best.

Are we as bad as our results this season? No. Of course not but Frank is also stymied by the fact that his predecessor overachieved - first with a 5th place finish and then with a major trophy.

But Postecoglou could only put so much lipstick on the pig. We have consistently declined in quality and experience over the years to the point where a major drop offf was inevitable. It's depressing but inevitable that we looked so much better when Bissouma came on today - because "good Biss" (with "good Maddison" was at the heart of anything we did well for the last 3 years. Because that PROFILE is what we so desperately need yet we never go out and sign it.

Obviously we can and should be doing better. I just think Frank was the wrong manager at the worst possible time. If we'd kept Postecoglou and he'd been sacked in December and THEN we'd hired Frank I suspect the players would have performed better under him and been more receptive to his coaching. It would still have been a grind to watch but I think the results would have been much better.

We - and any manager we hire - need one or two transformative signings. One in CM and one up top. Add Vuscovic and I think we have the ingredients a chef needs.

And to be honest I feel sorry for Frank. He's right - we are shit. Problem is he's not the guy to fix us. But who is?
I think the one thing I've learned from the past few years of Spurs is we really need to stop hoping managers will magically change and revamp their entire football style and philosophy to meet the demands of a different club.

Danny Kelly made a really good point the other day that, it's not always so much whether managers are bad or good...it's whether they're right.

Managers, more often that not, are what they are. What they've done in the past is what they're probably going to keep doing. They might be able to make tactical tweaks and adapt over time, but they don't simply become something different overnight if you give them more money and better players.

We had years of evidence of Frank's style, and Nuno's before him, yet we chose to believe they could change and do something different. Sure they both had about 1 year of vaguely attacking football years before but both were predominantly direct, pragmatic managers. Lo and behold, both turned out to be exactly what we should've expected. In fact Frank's been worse - he's actually regressed, resorting to his worst, most negative, survivalist tendencies at Brentford to grind out ugly results. I suspect if we gave him time he'd eventually improve us but only to the standard of a gilded Brentford, who scored plenty of goals but largely through set-pieces and breaks.

The reason Poch worked was because he was already playing progressive, high-pressing innovative football that naturally scaled up. It's also why a coach like Kompany did shit at Burnley in the PL but succeeded at Bayern. The things he was doing at Burnley weren't bad, but he was simply the wrong guy for a dodgy Burnley team that needed to grind out results in a highly competitive league. That style of play and mentality, however, was perfect for a club like Bayern.

We need to accept managers at face value and stop hoping they'll become something they're not.
 
Based on what? On the eye test, we look lucky not to be 3 or 4 down by half time in most games, and metrics like the xG table suggest that we are roughly where we deserve to be based on the football we've played. On top of that, when you consider that two of our wins were the first two games of the season, clearly we have gotten worse not better as the season has gone on, and we're in freefall now.

Not necessarily disagreeing with the rest of your post, and perhaps I'm misunderstanding you, but our performances under Frank have not deserved anything better than flirting with bottom 6. So if you mean our performances, yes they have been as bad as our league position suggests. If you mean 'is our squad really bottom 6 in the PL', then no, of course not. In which case it's primarily on Frank, sadly (as obviously he's a really nice bloke).

Sorry - yeah I meant our squad isn't as bad as our results have been. We have a very unbalanced and fragile squad which is midtable but not nearly as poor as what we've produced. So yep that's on Frank.

Having said that we are cursed by injury. Not as horrendous as last year but not far off it (there's nothing worse than having your first choice defence out - just look at Oil slavers right now) - so Frank has mitigating circumstances in that regard. I think that's my point - he's not my cup of tea but he IS a competent manager. the fact it's got so dire reflects more on the club as a whole than on him. I said this with Postecoglou and Conte as well. And things have only got worse.

So that's why I feel sorry for him. It was always going to end this way. Hence my Avatar sig - and my anger with the bullies and abusers who claimed everything was the last manager's fault. It wasn't. And still isn't. Frank is a problem but not the problem. Imo.
 
Last edited:


Yeah I'm sick of Frank and his xg numbers. Doesn't matter how shit the players you coach them how to create chances. If they're too shit to finish those chances off or play the right balls then fair enough but at least the coach is doing the job of creating a cohesive attacking approach, same for defense too.

Does anyone know Frank's footballing philosophy at Tottenham still? Apart from long throws or pass to Kudus

Time to go, hopefully I wake up to good news on that regard tomorrow
 
Conte and JM were the cases of a manager not getting fully embraced by the fans, even when results were acceptable or even flat out good, because of their style of play that was thought to clash with what this club has historically stood for [The Spurs Way].


This thread, whose first few pages featured numerous people complaining about how Conte ['s football] broke them, was created when we were in the mix for..

... top 4.

Due to the ongoing deterioration of the squad that has lowered the expectations quite sharply since then, Frank luckily never had to face such snobbery: He was, from day one, given green light by the fans to try to grind out results by whatever means necessary. This thread was absolutely buzzing, and any kind of skepticism about the sustainabiity of our results was met with vigorous gatekeeping, when he was 4th or even inside top 8.

The situation that we are in might have been reasonably brushed aside as a fit issue if Frank was, let's say, 8th but was struggling to win the fans over due to his penchant for long balls and set pieces.

This description fits Nuno's tenure to a much greater extent for example. Fans never bought into him, even when we were getting those 1-0s early in the season to rack up those points. He was 9th when he got sacked, right after he and the team got booed off the pitch in a 3-0 defeat to United.

Those aforementioned three, to varying degrees, failed to fit in. Frank simply failed.
 
Last edited:
Ultimately, we're unwatchable and keep signing the wrong players. Frank out.
 
Very fair take. I just think his body of work over the years at Brentford indicates a good level of competency. I don't think Vinai is lying when he said their metrics had Frank as a stand out candidate for what they were looking for.

The "deeper issues" are simply we have a fanbase and club hierarchy that are demanding Top 5 results from a squad that is so unbalanced and lacking in top end quality that it is, sadly, mid table at best.

Are we as bad as our results this season? No. Of course not but Frank is also stymied by the fact that his predecessor overachieved - first with a 5th place finish and then with a major trophy.

But Postecoglou could only put so much lipstick on the pig. We have consistently declined in quality and experience over the years to the point where a major drop offf was inevitable. It's depressing but inevitable that we looked so much better when Bissouma came on today - because "good Biss" (with "good Maddison" was at the heart of anything we did well for the last 3 years. Because that PROFILE is what we so desperately need yet we never go out and sign it.

Obviously we can and should be doing better. I just think Frank was the wrong manager at the worst possible time. If we'd kept Postecoglou and he'd been sacked in December and THEN we'd hired Frank I suspect the players would have performed better under him and been more receptive to his coaching. It would still have been a grind to watch but I think the results would have been much better.

We - and any manager we hire - need one or two transformative signings. One in CM and one up top. Add Vuscovic and I think we have the ingredients a chef needs.

And to be honest I feel sorry for Frank. He's right - we are shit. Problem is he's not the guy to fix us. But who is?
We're far worse than our place in the table. We had some ridiculously lucky results that we deserved nothing from and scored out of nowhere.

The absolute worst coach we've had in the PL era given the backing he's had.
 
It's going to take wire taps or unpaid taxes to get this cunt out. Once relegation is mathematically confirmed maybe then they might sack him.
 
My hunch is Johnny Heitinga till end of the season when Poch returns.

Would explain the Gallagher transfer.

Yea I have a sneaky suspicion he'll be caretaker manager soon. Very strange appointment I would say- hard to say what is going on without more details of who brought in who, but if by board/exec then could be a sign they will clean house on Frank's whole staff, and needed someone they could trust.

Thing is, I'm not really convinced Heitinga is going to be any better at getting us points in a relegation battle than Frank, so, what's the point? Just have somebody on standby just in case? Strange times no doubt...
 
Back
Top