Depends on how many times thinktank is allowed to vote.In a certain poll, almost 40% think that sacking Ange was a bad idea.
I wonder what would the result be in a poll about sacking Frank.

The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Depends on how many times thinktank is allowed to vote.In a certain poll, almost 40% think that sacking Ange was a bad idea.
I wonder what would the result be in a poll about sacking Frank.

lol the desperation is truly something to behold.Of course it is. It’s to do with the cowardly, negative, sideways and backwards, you’re not good enough mindset he instilled into the players.
‘I guarantee we will lose matches’
‘Woolwich are amazing, I love watching them!’
‘Record lowest xG in the Premier league here we come!’
I mean, if De Zerbi literally stating that he wants the team to get back to the way they played under Postecoglou doesn’t give you some sort of clue then nothing will.
Well, if 100 people voted, I'd pretty much guarantee that it would be 99% in favour of sacking him.In a certain poll, almost 40% think that sacking Ange was a bad idea.
I wonder what would the result be in a poll about sacking Frank.
lol the desperation is truly something to behold.
Absolutely wild.
It's like reasoning with a toddler, trying to get them to understand why the square block will never be able to fit through the round hole.
But they just ignore the obvious and keeper trying to bash it through.
Getting more and more angry and frustrated as it just can't fit.
a) Manure have a winning heritage far deeper than ours.Your analogy doesn’t hold water. I’ve displayed no anger or frustration at any stage of any exchange, so immediately you’re off to a shaky start.
But that aside, any points I’ve raised have been reasonable. Open to debate if you like, but I’m still waiting for someone to counter the point about Man Utd not falling victim to a losing mentality a year later despite an even worse season under Amorim. Or why countless other teams haven’t been inflicted by this fantasy issue over the years. Or why current results aren’t, you know, the incumbent manager’s responsibility, not that of the previous one. Or why half a team of this season’s new players who have never even met Ange have somehow been swept up in this fiction that only exists in your head.
Or why, if De Zerbi is bringing in a sports psychologist to address Postecoglou’s tenure, in the very next breath he’s referencing the football played under Ange and saying the team needs to return to it? That would be nonsensical.
Face it pal, you’ve spent a year fangirling for the worst manager in the club’s history and you still can’t let go long after every other fucker here has. The fact you hitched your wagon to a negative, cowardly, nice guy defence monkey must be the ultimate salt in the wound.
It really is perfectly simple, Thomas Frank made the mistake of referring to last season's woes.Or why half a team of this season’s new players who have never even met Ange have somehow been swept up in this
Your analogy doesn’t hold water. I’ve displayed no anger or frustration at any stage of any exchange, so immediately you’re off to a shaky start.
But that aside, any points I’ve raised have been reasonable. Open to debate if you like, but I’m still waiting for someone to counter the point about Man Utd not falling victim to a losing mentality a year later despite an even worse season under Amorim. Or why countless other teams haven’t been inflicted by this fantasy issue over the years. Or why current results aren’t, you know, the incumbent manager’s responsibility, not that of the previous one. Or why half a team of this season’s new players who have never even met Ange have somehow been swept up in this fiction that only exists in your head.
Or why, if De Zerbi is bringing in a sports psychologist to address Postecoglou’s tenure, in the very next breath he’s referencing the football played under Ange and saying the team needs to return to it? That would be nonsensical.
Face it pal, you’ve spent a year fangirling for the worst manager in the club’s history and you still can’t let go long after every other fucker here has. The fact you hitched your wagon to a negative, cowardly, nice guy defence monkey must be the ultimate salt in the wound.
That argument is absolutely pathetic.It really is perfectly simple, Thomas Frank made the mistake of referring to last season's woes.
So even the players that never met Postecoglou were also reminded about the previous season's league performance. It's a downer, it makes people moody, and effects their confidence. Postecoglou to a fair degree filled the void where tactics were lacking with his personality.
Frank has a smaller personality, and what made things worse was he belittled the team's Champions League qualification which was the good thing from last season that was brought forward, and he shat on it.
I know exactly what he meant, but it's not a good idea to look at an achievement as a way that the club almost fiddled it's way into the Champion's League, on top of reminding us all about the 17th league position.
I suppose he'd argue that's what Postecoglou left him with, but IMO he should have kept those thoughts to himself.
lol the desperation is truly something to behold.
Absolutely wild.
It's like reasoning with a toddler, trying to get them to understand why the square block will never be able to fit through the round hole.
But they just ignore the obvious and keeper trying to bash it through.
Getting more and more angry and frustrated as it just can't fit.
Oh so, demotivating the team by recalling how shit they were the previous season is a good way to manage.That argument is absolutely pathetic.
Good lord.
The reasoning of a child.
When Frank came in it was the JOURNOS who, predictably, started referring to the previous season's form and league position.Oh so, demotivating the team by recalling how shit they were the previous season is a good way to manage.
Gotcha. thanks for correcting me.
![]()
When Frank came in it was the JOURNOS who, predictably, started referring to the previous season's form and league position.
Frank responded to them in an attempt to manage and neutralise that line of questioning, because you know they were gearing up to use the previous season's record to beat us over the head with.
So Frank got ahead of it early and said we'd likely win a majority of games, draw some and likely lose a few.
I think he then went on to repeat that another couple of times later on.
He's hardly going to respond and manage negative narrative seeding in that context by saying we're going to go invincible.
The previous season in the league was horrific and as a new manager coming in, you want to get in front of it and be up front and say 'hey, I'm not a magician, so let's be reasonable about the timeline to correct things here and how it's likely to play out in the short-to-mid term'.
It's obviously what he was trying to do and people are being transparently disingenous about not acknowledging that was clearly the case.
You might say it was a bit clunky, there's an argument there, but it's perfectly understandable to have a practical approach in dealing with the media in the situation he walked into.
Any idea, though, that this -- those couple of occasions he said this in pressers -- somehow walloped the players over the head and hypnotised them, preventing them from listening to everything good about themselves he would have told them in training everyday, to boost them up and get them going and crushing them, is so diabolical I won't even waste laughter on it.
The level of reach in here is something to behold.
Intergalactic stupidity.
Night, mate.
I've been in the sack Frank by Christmas camp, actually I even posted when he was being mooted as a next manager, if I was in his position I'd stay at Brentford This isn't an easy club to manage, many a manager with one hand tied behind his back. Overall I think he was shit, my only argument in his favour is that he doesn't seem to be permitted the lots of injuries excuse as much.
lolz wut???I've been in the sack Frank by Christmas camp, actually I even posted when he was being mooted as a next manager, if I was in his position I'd stay at Brentford This isn't an easy club to manage, many a manager with one hand tied behind his back. Overall I think he was shit, my only argument in his favour is that he doesn't seem to be permitted the lots of injuries excuse as much.
We did start heading towards bottom table with Postecoglou, butthinktank can bet his ass and win, that if it was Harry Redknapp in his prime taking over, no way would there be a hangover, he'd have the team on a different path and wouldn't be publicly saying some of that shit that a clever man would be able not to be dragged into by journalists.
In a nutshell Frank is small time. I've given my opinion of Poestecogou plenty of times already,
Tagging your user name and informing you about something, isn't putting words into your mouth. I'm trying to help you. Sorry if it caused any offence.
Not offended, didn't know what you were talking about.Tagging your user name and informing you about something, isn't putting words into your mouth. I'm trying to help you. Sorry if it caused any offence.
I'm saying prime Harry Redknapp, or another manager with such an outlook, wouldn't have the team in a hangover if they came 17th the previous season.