How so?
If you have a world class back line against average attackers....is it easier for the attackers?
It depends on the level of players.
Attacking is easy if no one challenges you.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
How so?
If you have a world class back line against average attackers....is it easier for the attackers?
It depends on the level of players.
Attacking is easy if no one challenges you.
That is against Getafe. Maradona scored a better one in a World Cup ... admittedly it was only against England, but anyway.
When we're discussing these things we're assuming all things are equal. So we're not comparing a world class defence against average attackers or vice versa. So if we have two balanced players of equal ability going forward and defensively, then it will be more difficult to attack than defend.
Why? Because attacking generally involves having to move with a football, which is much more difficult than moving without one. Beating a player is one of the hardest things to do in football.
Like I said attacking players are worth more because they are more valuable as attacking is harder.
Why do you think small teams defend against big teams? Because it is easier to sit back and hold your position. Playing through teams is extremely difficult. This doesn't mean defending is easy, tackling, marking, positional awareness etc are things not everybody can master, but attacking is without a doubt harder.
Players try to challenge Messi but he evades them. Presently sometimes there are circumstances where they would have stuck a leg in if it was someone else but this is comparable to a world class boxer whose opponents fear throwing a punch because of the possible counter - Messi has earned this respect through schooling players back when he didn't have this reputation.
That is against Getafe. Maradona scored a better one in a World Cup ... admittedly it was only against England, but anyway.
I would agree, I think he's played in one of the most talented Argentina sides ever and still failed to dominate, lead or achieve at that level.Dropping the national team, two years before a World Cup where he'll just have turned 31. His legacy will be a player who very nearly was the best ever, but leaving the national team at a "young" age with his last contribution being a missed penalty will leave a sour taste imho.
I would agree, I think he's played in one of the most talented Argentina sides ever and still failed to dominate, lead or achieve at that level.
His club record is phenomenal, but he plays with the best, in a system and club that truly supports his talent.
At this point I'd question whether he's above Ronaldo. Ronaldo can at least claim to have done the absolute business in a different league.
It's tough to say "GOAT" because the game changes so much over the years, I think you can only really say "best of his generation". Maradona is the best of his generation, Messi is the best of his, who knows how they would do in each other's eras?
Monet.
No, it's not