Are you not capable of an intelligent conversation without being a knob? Ffs
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Are you not capable of an intelligent conversation without being a knob? Ffs
So you think he got it right then try and join in the forum consensus and accuse him of trolling us with VAR.He got the pen one spot on. You got schooled in basic football rules as usual. Now fuck off, troll
You can sit imagine all you want fella, just because you believe it to be true, doesn't make it so.Fucking hell.
What's next now, my diaper is smarter than you?
You're a mentally ill centenarian that seeks his self validation from an internet forum.
I feel sorry for you.
Hahahahahahahahahhahaha
I'm not sure about that. Even if we accept Son's actions constitute unsporting behaviour (which is pretty subjective), it occurred after encroachment. That should have meant the penalty was retaken.He got the pen one spot on.
No, you really cant.Son’s pen was completely legal. You can feint on the run up according to rule 14, which is what he did. The kick should have been retaken due to players in the box prior to the kick being taken. The yellow card for Son should be appealed by Spurs, it was a disgraceful call by the ref and VAR.
If they were all doctors, then it doesn't count as a complaint.After watching Dale for 39 years i pretty much thought i had ,I do have a soft spot for spurs even though i had 22 stitches in the 81 cup final replay from spurs fans .Somebody on here said i called spurs fans Cunts ,i cant find it in the messages i posted.Can somebody find it so i can apologise .
Is that a rule? How could Son strike the ball from where he stopped?If you stop your run up, you have to strike the ball
I think that Sons actions stopped the game, for foul play. Therefore the game restarts from where the foul occurred, as a re-start by RochdaleI'm not sure about that. Even if we accept Son's actions constitute unsporting behaviour (which is pretty subjective), it occurred after encroachment. That should have meant the penalty was retaken.
I'm not sure about that. Even if we accept Son's actions constitute unsporting behaviour (which is pretty subjective), it occurred after encroachment. That should have meant the penalty was retaken.
Every other decision was poor - but the pen was right - never argued otherwise. Go troll elsewhereSo you think he got it right then try and join in the forum consensus and accuse him of trolling us with VAR.
Like I said stand by an opinion for once and stop trying to just join in all the time.
That's the point. Players have gotten round that by feinting their strike at a point whereby they can dummy the keeper into committing, then changing the direction to the vacated space.Is that a rule? How could Son strike the ball from where he stopped?
I had food at tgi friday
The rule looks pretty unambiguous. He hadn’t completed his run up. He was about 2 yards from the ball when he “feinted” (ie stopped).At the time I thought the disallowed penalty and subsequent yellow card was ridiculous despite what others were saying. He didn't feint to kick the ball. You'd have to be a brave ref to give that, or one that wanted a bit of the limelight.
Good - the cunts hate us - that’s because they know we are going to finish above them again this season