Yep.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Yep.
I didn't say that we should have played Lloris.
Simple question - do you think playing him would have made a difference to the final score?
Cassé as the French kids would say!!Real Madrid hadn't bought a single first team player since Kroos 14/15 season, that's three seasons. Atleti also didn't sign anyone 17/18 season.
I'm saying a bonafide first team signing like Bale, Modric, Kroos...Hold on - what?
Real Madrid signed Danilo in 15/16, Morata the next year, Curtois and around 90m worth more this season (130m+ total this year alone)
Altetico signed Costa for 60m and Vitolo for around 35m last year
Impossible to say, I don't have a crystal ball. But I can say that Vorm wasn't the reason why we lost.Simple question - do you think playing him would have made a difference to the final score?
You can’t say that for certain
Taken out of his hands by whom?He disrespected the FA cup, and the fans, by dropping Hugo for Vorm in this years Semi Final.
Unless the decision was taken out of his hands, which would be even worse.
And please don't try telling me picking Vorm was a tactical selection.
After losing so many semi finals in a row, that decision alone was a betrayal of the supporters.
Completely get what you're saying, but I genuinely think the first trophy is the hardest and frankly, at this point I would rather win the not red bull cup as opposed to going out on the the first knockout of the CL ( not saying, I stress, that I don't want us to throw everything at the premiership or not qualify for the CL...buy we need that first pot)I have to take issue with this statement my friend.
I don't think Poch doesn't disrespect the Cups at all. In the four years, he has been here he has taken us to two FA Cup Semi-Finals and a League Cup Final. In all of those games, there wasn't any disapproval of the team selection, bar leaving Walker on the bench for one (it has to be said that Conte left Hazard and Matic on the bench in that game, did he disrespect the cup because of that?).
Anyway, he has shown what he thinks about the Cups by getting us to the semis and a final of another. Does Klopp have a label on his head as a man who disrespects the cups? He's taken Liverpool to semi's and a couple of finals and hasn't won any. Where's the difference?
Poch has been 100% right with how he describes the cups, they are not as prestigious as the League or the CL. Winning the League Championship is the be all and end all of the competitions, win that and you are the best side in the country, this is what every club should strive for, to be the best. Before Poch even turned up I can't recall Spurs ever being Spoken about as being the best club and I've been a supporter for 45yrs! For the first time as a supporter, we are entertaining the thought of being a contender for being the best.
Poch has changed the mindset of the club, the players, the administrators and the supporters. We no longer hope for a "decent cup run" at the beginning of the season. We have our eyes on not just the Championship but all the domestic trophies too. And it's this bit that's important, by being a bonafide best in the country challenger that also by default make us a favourite for one/all of the cups too.
He has prioritised us on focussing on the top step. He hasn't fielded shit teams or thrown the match in the semi's and the finals he's taken us to.
Yes. I'm sure levy awards his own salary and bonus.Spot on mate. They are gearing up to sell at a massive profit. Austerity measures until that time comes; Meanwhile Levy awards himself a massive salary hike and bonus.
The bonus itself is laughable considering the shit show that is the stadium, the lack of sponsorship in place; and last seasons inactivity. Yawn. I’ve been through it time and time again.
On a positive not, It does seem as though the support that some people have for Enic/Levy is starting to wane.
But we have focused on the Cups. The teams we put out in the semi's and Final were not rotated sides.Completely get what you're saying, but I genuinely think the first trophy is the hardest and frankly, at this point I would rather win the not red bull cup as opposed to going out on the the first knockout of the CL ( not saying, I stress, that I don't want us to throw everything at the premiership or not qualify for the CL...buy we need that first pot)
Somewhere there's an alternative universe where we won that first league cup, and subsequently best Leicester and the chavs to the league. And in said universe,Tottenham Massive is still whining about Levy
That's exactly what I am saying.
But not the strongest either..son at wing back, vorm instead of Lloris. I would have picked Lloris, not for the shite reasons we are hearing from others, cos I knew iny heart vorm was playing, not out of hindsight blaming him(vorm) for the goals, cos they weren't his fault, but cos he's(Lloris) a better keeper and, imo, brings the best out of his team mates: I think the defence trusts him moreBut we have focused on the Cups. The teams we put out in the semi's and Final were not rotated sides.
Practically everyone on here was angry to see Vorm named on the team sheet. Particularly in the light of 6 successive SF defeats...Impossible to say, I don't have a crystal ball. But I can say that Vorm wasn't the reason why we lost.
I don't think it was, which is why I said if.
but even here we are talking one player. Conte left their best player, Hazard & Costa on the bench was he not taking it seriously?But not the strongest either..son at wing back, vorm instead of Lloris. I would have picked Lloris, not for the shite reasons we are hearing from others, cos I knew iny heart vorm was playing, not out of hindsight blaming him(vorm) for the goals, cos they weren't his fault, but cos he's(Lloris) a better keeper and, imo, brings the best out of his team mates: I think the defence trusts him more
What have other 6 semi-finals got to do with anything? What has those results got to do with Vorm and Poch?Practically everyone on here was angry to see Vorm named on the team sheet. Particularly in the light of 6 successive SF defeats...
A clear indication the manager/club did not take the FA Cup seriously
He subsequently had a mare which made a huge contribution to our loss.
Why are you trying to justify this. I don't understand your stance.
Is it any wonder so many on here claim you're some kind of PR mouthpiece for the regime?
He did have a mare. He was at fault for both goals. But you're clearly not prepared to admit it so I'll move on...What have other 6 semi-finals got to do with anything? What has those results got to do with Vorm and Poch?
Did Conte betray and disrespect Chelsea fans for leaving Hazard and Costa on the bench when we played them?
Vorm didn't have a mare, do you say a 'keeper has a mare whenever a goal is conceded?
What do you mean why am I trying to justify this? I disagree vehemently that Vorm was the reason we lost, I disagree vehemently that Poch disrespected & betrayed us fans. I'm not justifying anything, I'm disagreeing.
We weren't finishing 3rd, 2nd or 3rd under any other manager though were we? ONLY him in the last 34yrs have we even utter the words title challenge. Only ONE man responsible for that and that's Pochettinho.
1984/85, 1986/87 & 1989/90 we finished 3rd. I don't recall a single word spoken apart from 86/87 about us challenging for the title and that year really people were saying this because we were on for a treble, we were 17 points of Everton, nowhere close to winning a title. So, these words haven't realistically been uttered in my life-time as a supporter.
You can't be seriously suggesting that you uttered those immortal words "title contenders" when we had AVB or Sherwood managing the side, I mean those players you identified were in the side then, right? So if you are talking about revisionism then I suggest you look in the fucking mirror.