The positions I defend them on are factual.
Have we progress under ENIC? Yes.
Have we upped our spending since the stadium was built? Yes.
Do we play better football now than pre-ENIC? Yes.
Do I have a stronger bond with the players and the manager? Yes.
Don't try spin my own question back on me. I asked you, the great critique, who seems to know exactly what a good owner is, yet couldn't even name John Henry as a good option to own the club. I said nothing about only. What was that about being disingenuous?
I've already answered my own question once for you. I'm not breastfeeding you further.
Ok let's look at your "factual"points...
"Have we progressed under ENIC"
More complex than a yes or no imo, it depends what you define as progress.
There is no denying that in terms of league position, brand awareness and monetary value we have progressed under ENIC, in terms of trophies won we have actually regressed, so it depends what your definition of progress is, personally I think we have progressed under them despite our lack of trophies but I also think we could do better than them and just because they are far better than our previous owners doesn't mean we can't do better than them, so you answer on this is subjective, not factual.
"Have we upped our spending since building the stadium"
You say we have, again, this isn't factual.
I am saying that we are doing what we always have done, sell to buy and maintain profit over on field success, your opinion on this isn't factual or based on evidence, it's based on your feelings that we have suddenly spent because of the stadium being built.
My opinion is based on ENIC and their business model since being at Spurs and that we would have spent this window irrespective of the stadium being built or not because our spending was based on sales and CL revenue being above what was expected, this is the model they have always had since being our owners.
"Do we play better football now than pre ENIC"
This is subjective, not factual, I happen to agree with you but that doesn't make it a fact.
If you said "we've had better league positions under ENIC" I would agree, that is a fact, no denying that.
But "playing better football" is subjective, we could play shit defensive football and win a trophy, doesn't mean the football is "better."
"Do I have a stronger bond with the players and manager" again, subjective, not fact.
Also, I didn't claim to know who should be our owners, I said I want owners that prioritise success on the pitch, that's it, that's the only criteria that matters to me as a supporter.
ochfacepalm:
