That was 4 years ago Guido. time moves on and Harry lumbers up top (so much so that Mou has him dropping so Sonny can strech the defense), Mousa is no longer here and neither is Wanyama to stomp out attacks and hoover up second balls, Sonny has never been good pressing, etc etc fucking etc.
I dislike Mou as much as the next right thinking person but let's not invent alternative facts here. The team needed a rebuild when Poch was here. Still doesn't excuse the whole ball of nothing we look like...that is all on Mou.
Out of that group 2 maybe 3 I would have been good with. Not everyone was wanking at this past summer window. And even if you look at those players it doesn't display a plan beyond the fact they were cheap and opportunistic buys. DL even came out patting himself on the back for the REggie/Bale move giving himself full credit. Again, Mou has massive culpability here as well as the players but there is another person responsible for this too.
There are some on here (and the tide is turning) calling Mou out for this BS.
Totally with you here.
Is that thing with Lloris true?
The main point is I've watched many a team play progressive football under the tutelage of a good coach with limited players, who has them performing better than the sum of their parts. This is absolutely fundamental part of identifying a talented manager. (I've listed them before and I think we are on the same page on these managers) and Poch was also a classic example of this when he joined us.
The results may not be there, but the performance can be and conclusions can be debated about what is lacking etc. The biggest example of this is Hasslehuttle and Potter. Their squads are completly bare of any world-class talent but they play well but ultimately let down by not having player 'X', 'Y' or 'Z' in whatever position.
Playing as we are it's simply impossible to draw too much onto player 'X' as shit when none of them, with the exception of Son and Kane, are set up to succeed. I have said from the day we signed Doherty that he's not as good as Aurier, whilst taking a ton of flack at the time I think it's fair to say I might have been right on that score. BUT, I'm not bashing the fella because they way we are set up means all of our defenders are going to make errors and will eventually result in the oppo profiting from it. The said player then becomes the object of derision, led by the chief cheerleader Jose himself.
The pressure that our players are now having to perform under is immense, they are terrified at making a mistake, which either manifests in them making a mistake or us playing risk-averse pass and boring shite, or as in our case BOTH! When a team is drilled to be fearful of an opponent’s threat, this is the approach to which we will default in times of stress. The defensive line that drops just a couple of yards, the ambitious through ball eschewed in favour of a safe sideways pass, the little cues that alert an opponent that the momentum is shifting, the forward 10yrd run to receive the ball is not made as they think the player on the ball will lose it, and they will then be out of position, to not show for the ball at all as this might invite an error. This is the downward spiral of what is manifesting itself on the pitch.
Good managers have the players walking on air, having them confident and therefore wanting the ball, looking for it, showing for it. From this baseline, good and poor players can be identified. Potter can look at his attacking options and know that with a better forward selection they can score more goals, Ralph will know another CB with pace and an aggressive 6 is a must if he wants to maintain his high-line.