• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Competition European Super League OFF; Spurs face withdrawal fee

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Do you support the European Super League


  • Total voters
    396
Oh Will.... only you can gracefully sneak in some commie propaganda in this discussion.
:sonpoint:
Putting Jimmy Fallon GIF by The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon
 
I think this is really just posturing by the big clubs, that will ultimately fail in formation of ESL but give them bigger slice of CL revenue.

It will fail due to sanctions on players. Players that have earned enough money to last them and their heirs for life will not be prepared to give up international football, and will claim frustration of contracts by clubs, and possibly even be able to walk for nothing.

Telling that players, FIFPRO and PFA have not spoken, they hold the ultimate power in this.
 
Smells like Fuedalism to me.
D-C was always just a resetting of the game and starting fresh. It took centuries of tribes killing, merging, wrestling power away, accumulating more and more land before the order began to stabilize and homogenized around a handful of global superpowers. The liberty revolutions just started a new game, and its quickly reaching a conclusion.

Hopefully Musk buys Spurs and we can be the first football club off this fucked planet.
 
This project exposes the reality of Fundamentalist Free Market Capitalism, which is not about maximising competition but instead about exploiting Capital to secure Monopoly Status for those with the deepest pockets and most privileged access to Finance (in this case, the banker scum of JP Morgan). To get all Marxist for a moment.

Just like Covid-19 was a wet dream for Big Pharma (which was granted unlimited access to human test subjects, all R&D taxpayer- funded even if their particular drug failed, and fast track, minimalist regulation for drugs with an ongoing market of the entire human population), so the Fat Cat, often heavily leveraged, owners of the world's biggest football clubs ultimately want to minimise or even eradicate Risk.

The NFL American football model has franchises with no relegation, so your team can suck for decades and, well, that's just the way the cookie crumbles for fans of those clubs. The Fat Cat owners still make huge profits from monopoly TV rights deals, stadiums funded by taxpayers, sales merchandise etc even when their franchise loses every single match it plays. There is no jeopardy of relegation, of losing your place amongst the elite.

Also, NFL owners don't have to worry about developing young players as all youngsters are legally obliged to go to college teams, essentially without remuneration, risking their bodies & health for the chance of getting drafted. Which means being told which team they're going to play for as the Fat Cat owners allocate their free lottery tickets (draft picks) to hoover up the best young talent.

And finally, NFL owners benefit from a salary cap, which exerts significant control over salary inflation and makes medium term financial planning easy. Plus no astronomical transfer fees, as players are "traded" for lottery tickets (draft picks), not for tens of millions of pounds. Again, the eradication of financial risk.

So, no need to put performance clauses in a manager's contract around say Champions League qualification. This new, bastardized-American sports model, essentially creates a status quo for the 23 years the clubs have signed up to.

I still bleed Spurs. And I want us have the best team possible playing the very best teams.

But I loathe this Uber-Capitalist destruction of the beautiful game by scum like the Glazers who have never kicked a ball in their lives.

It sounds like it should work like that doesn't it, however if you look at the championships by team in the NFL in the years since the premier league started (below) - it is 16 different teams - exactly 50% of the entire league. Almost makes the championship look uncompetitive.

Premier league? 7 Champions. Most wins is United with 13, over double what New England have won.

The thing is that the NFL, NBA, AFL and other similar model leagues (relegation concept is surprisingly rare in sports leagues outside of football - not just in America) address the risks upfront by trying to ensure equality for example through CBA in the NBA which redistributes overspends against the salary cap. Meanwhile the rules ensure teams don't underpay players. This ensures a level plainfield and by eliminating the need for transfer fees it means there's no possibility of an Abramovich or Citeh, again maintaining clarity.

The lack of any such system in football is why transfer fees exist. The threat of relegation means teams can't just "rebuild". In US sports sometimes if teams see no route to win they trade their best assets and go into a 4-5 year rebuild (Knicks just coming good after a decade long one now), acquiring draft picks for their best players on 4 year rookie contracts to start over. In football you couldn't do that due to relegation threat - so teams are forced to spend 100-200mil to finish 16th. It's ridiculous and less competitive than the non-football systems as shown in the number of champions in the time period. This is because the financial requirement for survival in current European football models is so high that anything above and beyond that - to even think about competing for titles - is utterly prohibitive. Hence why barely any teams have ever won it.

Spain is even worse. Juve have won 9 in a row. France and Germany usually a one horse race.

The data just doesn't support what you're saying, but I agree that inuitively the football "grass roots" model sounds better the truth is in practice it's way less competitive.

I'm open minded to change.

Edit: Also added the NBA, won by 11 different teams - 50% more than the premier league in same period. Most wins by Lakers (still half as many as United have). I get a lot of the concerns about super league, but data from sports all around the world over many years proves the hypothesis that relegation = competitive is false. Therefore, arguments against the super league should take a new angle cos trust me, the big boys have their spreadsheets ready!

TeamChampionships
New England
6​
Dallas
3​
Denver
3​
Baltimore
2​
Green Bay
2​
New York
2​
Pittsburgh
2​
Tampa Bay
2​
Indianapolis
1​
Kansas City
1​
New Orleans
1​
Philadelphia
1​
San Francisco
1​
Seattle
1​
St Louis
1​
Washington
1​

NBA:

TeamChampionships
Los Angeles
6​
Chicago
5​
San Antonio
5​
Golden State
3​
Miami
3​
Houston
2​
Boston
1​
Cleveland
1​
Dallas
1​
Detroit
1​
Toronto
1​
 
Last edited:
Its an open vote you can see who voted for what if you click on it.

Don't think its productive to start insulting people even though I disagree with them, everyone is entitled to an opinion.

Neeeeeever gonna happen. They're all worth too much to the TV companies and therefore the rights and therefore the leagues
Not going to be worth anything once the super league happens.. sources have said these teams will play weakened teams in the premier league and concentrate fully on the super league!
 
Back
Top