Although I am fond of Son and don’t want him sold, this made me laugh because it’s actually true!Not too bad we likely had our best 3-4 seasons in 30+ years after he was sold.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Although I am fond of Son and don’t want him sold, this made me laugh because it’s actually true!Not too bad we likely had our best 3-4 seasons in 30+ years after he was sold.
Although I am fond of Son and don’t want him sold, this made me laugh because it’s actually true!
Have you rewatched the match since it happened? It's genuinely a fascinating experience because Kane was actually one of the least worst players. What struck me most on a calm, dispassionate review was how almost everyone was failing to make simple six yard passes. Kane was one of the few players doing them right. I think the hyperfocus on Kane before and during the game allowed worse performances elsewhere to slide unnoticed to a large degree.If I really had to pick one player, it would be Kane for that game. Everyone questioned Poch's decision to play him. He was obviously not ready after the long injury break.
That’s quite possible, but it’s not something that really stuck with me.
Van Dijk had Kane for breakfast in that European Cup Final.Have you rewatched the match since it happened? It's genuinely a fascinating experience because Kane was actually one of the least worst players. What struck me most on a calm, dispassionate review was how almost everyone was failing to make simple six yard passes. Kane was one of the few players doing them right. I think the hyperfocus on Kane before and during the game allowed worse performances elsewhere to slide unnoticed to a large degree.
The format was notably similar to the LC final, which led me to blame nerves and mentality as the most obvious shared factor. Again, in the LC final, Kane was one of the players who didn't totally forget how to do the basics.
The legacy of Suarez the cannibal lives on.
I'm not saying he was good by any stretch, mate. He was bad. I'm just questioning the idea that he was solely or even mostly to blame for the loss in a match where there were many players even worse than an unfit, out-of-practice Kane. I seem to recall that Eriksen was particularly awful relative to his own standards.
The counterarguments would be that we made it through Dortmund, a daunting City team as well as Ajax without Kane. Kane's mere presence could have impacted the team's tactics and team's chemistry in unknown ways. My view is that we should have stuck to what got us to the final.I'm not saying he was good by any stretch, mate. He was bad. I'm just questioning the idea that he was solely or even mostly to blame for the loss in a match where there were many players even worse than an unfit, out-of-practice Kane. I seem to recall that Eriksen was particularly awful relative to his own standards.
I can't help feeling that most of the team completely lost it with nerves in both the CL and LC finals, despite it not being exactly the same players. I largely reject the hypothesis that the players simply didn't try or weren't interested in the League Cup (I think the full-time reaction puts the lie to that): to me, it looked like they were paralysed by fear. Kane, to his credit, has never been in a match where I felt he was phased by the occasion, though he did have his own extenuating circumstances in those two matches. Very unlucky for him and Spurs really. The probability of him being injured for those two matches specifically was pretty low.
When hindsight bias is put aside, I still totally defend Poch's gamble on Kane in the CL (and the LC). When you look at how bad the team as a whole was in that match, the only way they were winning was if the gamble paid off and Kane had one of his all-time great performances. On a different forum, I made a bullet-pointed list of reasons I thought it was the right bet but this Isn't the thread for that.![]()
Who are you talking to?
I suppose when Son is gone you will be too. Silver linings and all that...
Eriksen had been poor in the quarters, semis and final to be honest but that seems to be forgotten.I'm not saying he was good by any stretch, mate. He was bad. I'm just questioning the idea that he was solely or even mostly to blame for the loss in a match where there were many players even worse than an unfit, out-of-practice Kane. I seem to recall that Eriksen was particularly awful relative to his own standards.
I can't help feeling that most of the team completely lost it with nerves in both the CL and LC finals, despite it not being exactly the same players. I largely reject the hypothesis that the players simply didn't try or weren't interested in the League Cup (I think the full-time reaction puts the lie to that): to me, it looked like they were paralysed by fear. Kane, to his credit, has never been in a match where I felt he was phased by the occasion, though he did have his own extenuating circumstances in those two matches. Very unlucky for him and Spurs really. The probability of him being injured for those two matches specifically was pretty low.
When hindsight bias is put aside, I still totally defend Poch's gamble on Kane in the CL (and the LC). When you look at how bad the team as a whole was in that match, the only way they were winning was if the gamble paid off and Kane had one of his all-time great performances. On a different forum, I made a bullet-pointed list of reasons I thought it was the right bet but this Isn't the thread for that.![]()
Agree with the Kane bit but Eriksen was poorThe counterarguments would be that we made it through Dortmund, a daunting City team as well as Ajax without Kane. Kane's mere presence could have impacted the team's tactics and team's chemistry in unknown ways. My view is that we should have stuck to what got us to the final.
But... everything is clear in hindsight. Who knows how it would have played out. To your point, almost everyone looked like they were not up for it exception being Son and maybe Rose/Winks. I also thought Eriksen had a decent game. Kane was just non existent.
I’ve noticed that every post you write has a lol somewhere. Lol!