• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Management Nuno out

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Should Nuno be sacked ?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Saying it was the right time for Poch to go is daft.

Yes it was, but only in the same way it's the right thing to go to a hospital after you've been shot.
Ideally you wouldn't get shot in the first place.

The problems were literally the direct consequence of severe underinvestment.

If Pool or City backed their managers like we did it would have been "right" for Pep and Klopp to go too, many many seasons ago.

Let's be sensible and not try to make ourselves feel better for wrongly ever being Poch out.

The Poch situation became untenable precisely because he wasn’t listened to.

We lost a great coach and before that we lost a great head of recruitment in Paul Mitchell for similar reasons.
 
Saying it was the right time for Poch to go is daft.

Yes it was, but only in the same way it's the right thing to go to a hospital after you've been shot.
Ideally you wouldn't get shot in the first place.

The problems were literally the direct consequence of severe underinvestment.

If Pool or City backed their managers like we did it would have been "right" for Pep and Klopp to go too, many many seasons ago.

Let's be sensible and not try to make ourselves feel better for wrongly ever being Poch out.
The problem was not just underinvestment it was the fact we made some really poor acquisitions as well. Aurier, Sissoko and Jansen were all awful purchases. Then we signed Llorente as one upping Chelsea was stupid as hell even with his handball goal against Man City. We have had zero plan when it comes to transfers it seems that we are currently fire fighting when it comes to transfers. We need a plan how to get back to where we were. We need to identify who should still be at Spurs and get rid of the rest no matter what.
 
IIRC, we wanted Kante but he was a £200k a week player on top of the £30m fee.
Sissoko was a "bit like Kante" but only wanted £70k a week

Made good business sense.

200.gif
Worse than that, pretty sure it's stated directly in Poch's book that he was intended to do the job that Mane did/does at Southampton/Liverpool, a pacey wide player to break the lines and open teams up...

:pochshock:

Actually, I think I've just convinced myself again that Poch had lost the plot and had to go...
 
Worse than that, pretty sure it's stated directly in Poch's book that he was intended to do the job that Mane did/does at Southampton/Liverpool, a pacey wide player to break the lines and open teams up...

:pochshock:

Actually, I think I've just convinced myself again that Poch had lost the plot and had to go...
I don't think Poch was particularly good at scouting. Good at coaching players if they were receptive but not good at finding players.
 
The problem was not just underinvestment it was the fact we made some really poor acquisitions as well. Aurier, Sissoko and Jansen were all awful purchases. Then we signed Llorente as one upping Chelsea was stupid as hell even with his handball goal against Man City. We have had zero plan when it comes to transfers it seems that we are currently fire fighting when it comes to transfers. We need a plan how to get back to where we were. We need to identify who should still be at Spurs and get rid of the rest no matter what.
I agree with you. I would just consider those poor purchases to fall under underinvestment as they were cheap options compared to the first choice (Mane, Wijnaldum, Grealish etc).
 
I did and I don't dispute your logic. But there was no coming back from it. Levy wasn't gonna suddenly flog 3/4 of the squad and give Poch a ton of money to rebuild. Another reason I don't think Poch should come back until all those players are gone and Levy is well out of the way.

The problem is that all the things that would have been necessary to keep Poch happy are things that would need to be done now to attract ANY good manager.
 
1 Coupe de France with the best team in the League funded by oily financial doping in a 13 year management career.

Yeah, bring him back, he will work wonders with this squad. Don't eat the Memberberries. Every other club that was around us has strengthened more than we have since he left.
 
I think we could convince Rogers. I think he's slimey enough to be paid to leave.
I do agree that Daniel Greedy and ENIC have become very known now and getting a top level coach to come is going to be hard. But I don't put Rogers at the top. He's much better than Nono though.
We're not gonna get Conte or Zidane or the likes of Touchel, Naiggelsman or Flick when they were available, because they had top jobs lined up. But Spurs are a bigger club that Leicester and Brighton.
Funny thing was, at the start of this mess, I wasn't fussed about Rogers or Potter, but given what we ended up with, I'd fucking get on my knees and beg one of those 2 to come.
So we hire a guy who's only interested in coming here because he's being paid shitloads of money? How did that workout last time? We are bigger than Leicester for sure but we don't act like it. They've won two trophies to our one during ENIC's time. They go out and get Daka, while we fumble about with a loan signing and a 17 year old kid who is not ready. We have been merked by Leicester. He's not coming here forget it. Potter there is no reason for him to leave Brighton for us, United or Woolwich job could come up, those clubs actually have lots of money to spend in their quest to be top 4.
 
I don't think Poch was particularly good at scouting. Good at coaching players if they were receptive but not good at finding players.
On the evidence we have I'd have to agree, but it's blurred a little by the fact that we don't know how much was him wanting these players and how much was them just being the best of the bunch that was offered to him.

As it is written in his book, he was offered Sissoko and agreed to the signing, we don't know what the alternatives were at the point that he approved it, if any. Seems to me Sissoko was a case of might as well have him than not.

We also loosely know what happened when Poch decided not to compromise on what he wanted, we ended up with nobody.
 
So we hire a guy who's only interested in coming here because he's being paid shitloads of money? How did that workout last time? We are bigger than Leicester for sure but we don't act like it. They've won two trophies to our one during ENIC's time. They go out and get Daka, while we fumble about with a loan signing and a 17 year old kid who is not ready. We have been merked by Leicester. He's not coming here forget it. Potter there is no reason for him to leave Brighton for us, United or Woolwich job could come up, those clubs actually have lots of money to spend in their quest to be top 4.

We hire a guy who is better at his job than the yes man we have to come in for few years. That's the crux of it.
I don't care if he or anyone comes for the money rather than any kind of love. I just want an actual football coach with ambitions higher than finishing top half and a cup run to maybe a quarter final.
 
You say that now but I don't believe anybody deep down is going to be happy with that, while West Ham and Leicester finish above us.
Not happy, but happier and that's a start.

There's also the thought, for me at least, that if you get our squad playing well again then I find it hard to believe we wouldn't finish higher up the table than we will playing as we are.

However, maybe that's just me not quite fully accepting how far we have regressed over the last 3 years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top